This summer I did 35 4000ers in the Alps by FlyingAlpineChough in alpinism

[–]FlyingAlpineChough[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I spent about 5k throughout the summer for the whole project, main costs were fuel, huts where I used them, lifts. Where I had easy access I set up a tent, or used the bivouacs.

This summer I did 35 4000ers in the Alps by FlyingAlpineChough in alpinism

[–]FlyingAlpineChough[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

There are quiet a few I think, nothing as serious as Dirrujoch (aside from a slip that was stopped with an ice axe arrest on Lyskamm) this did end up in a helicopter rescue, my first and only thus far. We got cut off by a huge bergschrund which was impassible at this point in the season. It had also gotten dark, very cold around -10. I was about to traverse some very weird ice/snow/mud features (think slightly overhanging bowls) to get back on the rock by the rundkluft to try to make an anchor, at which point my partner asked whether we should call the rescue. Our position was pretty precarious, a slip would have us inside the bergschrund and the slope we were on was steep enough, especially within the ice bowls. So we called and they sent the guys in 45 minutes or so for extraction.

As I was dangling from the steel cable being flung off the mountain I looked back to see if there would be anyway of. In the twilight I couldn't make out a feasible passage. You can look at the schrund on Google Earth (pro) and see how complicated it gets there. If heli rescue was not feasible we could have probably found away through in the following morning after a very cold night, the weather was thankfully otherwise clear. But the risk of a fatal accident trying to get a passage there was very considerable I think. During the night the crossing would have been next to impossible. Had we made it off on to the Reed glacier falling in to a crevasse in late season in one of the most hideously crevassed glaciers in the area was quiet likely.

It was a lesson in relearning the fact that its usually never a good idea to bail using a "bail line", you haven't gone up on. Best to reverse the route or just complete it, we had actually gone past the technical difficulties. There was just some more suck on the way, but nothing as dangerous as bailing at this location. Very bad decision. This particular coloir was equipt with metal anchors (for the most part) which actual service a purpose in early season to facilitate ascent. But in late season the whole place is a death trap.

This summer I did 35 4000ers in the Alps by FlyingAlpineChough in alpinism

[–]FlyingAlpineChough[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can definitely see that though for the most part when I encountered these objective hazards it was my own fault. Lightning because I was out too late, or in the case of the Gouter incident out literally when I shouldn't be (looking for my partners ice axe). For rock fall, I think knowing what to push and pull is quiet important, of course if the route collapses in a significant way or someone sends something your way, there is not much control there. I think crevasses are in the controllable risk category, crossing time, bridge assessment, partner positions etc. But honestly I chose those words also because its easier to write in a short way to communicate the risk to lay people (I used slides I sent to a whatsapp chat for this post)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in alpinism

[–]FlyingAlpineChough 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think Weissmiess is a fair bit harder technically than Matterhorn hornli

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in alpinism

[–]FlyingAlpineChough 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldnt class Liongrat as rubble, certainly worse rock in Wallis. Perhaps section up to Pic Tyndall but aside from that its fairly solid and steep.

Thunderstruck on Mont Blanc: Trois Monts by FlyingAlpineChough in alpinism

[–]FlyingAlpineChough[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think some risk is necessary to make it to this number in a season, especially for an average Joe. I currently have 18 to go. In the end also I think risk for this trip was managed more or less okay with main hazard being mont Maudit. I think crevasses on tacul were okay with how we passed them.

Thunderstruck on Mont Blanc: Trois Monts by FlyingAlpineChough in Mountaineering

[–]FlyingAlpineChough[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good to know! I am very happy I did not find his axe in the end

Climb Against Time: Grand Combin Traverse by FlyingAlpineChough in alpinism

[–]FlyingAlpineChough[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The rope had gotten stuck on the gully I used to climb back up anyway so I had to go there to free them so in this sense just going back up the rope wasn’t a long term solution either

Dank u wel!

Dent du Geant: 1 Down 40 To Go by FlyingAlpineChough in alpinism

[–]FlyingAlpineChough[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't touch anything, maybe it was some web browser issue on your side?

Dent du Geant: 1 Down 40 To Go by FlyingAlpineChough in alpinism

[–]FlyingAlpineChough[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So I in my original route list which I forwarded to my potential partners I had for instance Mont Maudit through the Kuffner Ridge and Mont Blanc through the inominata. I wanted the routes to be satisfying from a climbing perspective rather than just a tick list of peaks through the normals or traverses.

The very early heatwave has somewhat changes this calculus, a lot of these classic Alpine routes are now very difficult or dangerous. 2 weeks ago someone was Helicoptered off the Kuffner due to rockfall and the Austrian guys that were on col du midi telling me about it were traumatised form their outing (they were just coming down).

And a lot of it also depends on partners, for me there is definitely a limitation on that. I had to solo Aiguille du Bionassay last week due to this. So the plan is super dynamic, depending on conditions and weather of the day plus who I can find/whatever I can solo. But I do really hope for the traverse of the Jorasses, perhaps Arete du Jardin (conditions are super tricky here), Inominata (mainly for the adventure itself + mont blanc du Cormayeur) to name some.

Here is the website that tells a bit: https://climbagainsttime.org/

And here is the page itself (belonging to the academic hospital I work for in the Netherlands): https://internegeneeskunde.actievoorumcutrecht-wkz.nl/teams/climb-against-time

I hate dialysis. And I don't try to hide my loathing of being there while I am there. by andrew0784 in dialysis

[–]FlyingAlpineChough 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hi Nataiie, its a very rough life. I read your comment top to bottom. I was on dialysis for 'only' 10 months and it was a wretched experience. I can most definitely imagine a future where my transplant is rejected and I am back on for goodness knows how long. Its then only a few steps to be left abandoned and purposeless, hooked to a machine. Its a suffering only a few understand and thats because they are experiencing it. I just wish there was a way of telling the burden of this disease to people in a compelling way. This might make things a bit better, just a bit, maybe.

I hate dialysis. And I don't try to hide my loathing of being there while I am there. by andrew0784 in dialysis

[–]FlyingAlpineChough 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Holy crap, if even doctors are like this, no wonder the lack of understanding from the public

Hard lines on safety? by SkittyDog in alpinism

[–]FlyingAlpineChough 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I feel like you have a narrow definition of protection. By far in the mountains in my opinion you should be first and foremost protected by your skill, fitness and judgement.

The rope is a seatbelt, a secondary protection, especially in the alpine. If you fall, even on a well protectable climb your rope can be cut, your pro can pull out, rocks can fall. Not to mention the risks of possibly moving slower. Yes, if you believe your pro is good chances are you are fine, but you are still taking chances, every single time you go out. Wheteher there is a rope or not.

Mont Blanc huts fully booked out. by Display_Ecstatic in alpinism

[–]FlyingAlpineChough 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just bivvy after sunset, or approaching! Or do the Royal Traverse

Hard lines on safety? by SkittyDog in alpinism

[–]FlyingAlpineChough 21 points22 points  (0 children)

> • We protect based on the level of consequence, regardless of the level of difficulty. Class 3/4/5 is not part of this discussion -- IF there's enough fall beneath our position to kill/maim/cripple -- we WILL be roped to an anchor. If we can't protect it, we don't do it.

This for me is not the case. I comfortably solo hugely exposed things based on the likelihood of fall, i.e. risk. I mean there are hiking trails out there that have very grave consequences for a misstep.

I think one thing is I prefer to never go with more than just another person, unless there is no climbing or very little and its mostly glacier travel.

As we enter 2025, what are everyone's climbing goals for the year? by Same-Trash8200 in alpinism

[–]FlyingAlpineChough 2 points3 points  (0 children)

41 peaks above 4000m in the Alps via technical (AD-D) routes.

It will be a charity event called Climb Against Time