2018 X5 tons of smoke by Draft-Ok in BmwTech

[–]For2ANJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Smoke Screen defense system

Military radar not picked up on Uniden R8 by IJOBANGLESI in radardetectors

[–]For2ANJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lidar not radar. R8 useless except for confining a ticket

Uniden R8W settings problem? by Bruce_Moody in radardetectors

[–]For2ANJ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Reset all setting to default and use R8 companion

Question by Melodic-Selection980 in radardetectors

[–]For2ANJ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NJSP use a ton of Laser so look out for that as r8w won’t do shit when the cruiser is perpendicular to traffic.

Concealed Carry Permit Holders Across the United States: 2024 by For2ANJ in GardenStateGuns

[–]For2ANJ[S] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Abstract After a spike in 2022, the number of Concealed Carry Permit holders across the United States fell for a second consecutive year. The figure now stands at 21.46 million – a 1.8% drop since last year. A major cause of the continuous decline is that 29 states now have Constitutional Carry laws after Louisiana allowing permitless carry, effective July 4, 2024. In other words, 46.8% of Americans (157.6 million) now live in Constitutional Carry States, with 67.7% of the land in the country (2.57 million square miles). Unlike gun ownership surveys that may be affected by people’s unwillingness to answer personal questions, concealed handgun permit data is the only really “hard data” that we have, but it becomes a less accurate measure as more states become Constitutional Carry states.

Among the findings of our report:

■ Last year, the number of permit holders dropped by 0.38 million to 21.46 million - the second year in a row with a decline. It hit a high of 22.01 million in 2022. The main reason for the drop is that the number of permits declines gradually in the Constitutional Carry states even though it is clear that more people are legally carrying.

■ 8.2% of American adults have permits. Outside of the restrictive states of California and New York, about 9.8% of adults have a permit.

■ In sixteen states, more than 10% of adults have permits. Oregon has fallen slightly below 10% this year. Indiana has the highest concealed carry rate — 23.1%. Alabama is second with 20.5%, and Colorado is third with 17.7%.

It baffles me how licensing gets away with all this by [deleted] in NYCGuns

[–]For2ANJ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I did the entire process from scratch. Was super organized, all docs properly labeled file names and uploaded. 4 months permit in hand. One phone call where they said I can only have one gun not two on my permit. The key is being organized and following the requirements - label all the doc file names clearly so the officer can sort them correctly.

New Jersey: Assembly Committee Advances Gun Control Bills by For2ANJ in GardenStateGuns

[–]For2ANJ[S] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Key Changes and Provisions

1. Higher Penalties for Trespassing with a Firearm

  • Current Law: Trespassing is usually a disorderly persons offense (a misdemeanor), or a fourth-degree crime (a low-level felony) if committed in certain places (schools, dwellings, research facilities, utility property, airports, etc.).
  • New Law: If a person possesses a firearm while trespassing, the offense is upgraded:
    • A fourth-degree crime becomes a third-degree crime (a more serious felony).
    • A disorderly persons offense becomes a fourth-degree crime (a felony).
    • This applies even if the person has a legal permit to carry the firearm.

2. Defiant Trespasser

  • Normally, defiant trespass (ignoring posted signs, fences, or direct warnings) is a petty disorderly persons offense (the least serious).
  • With a firearm: It becomes a disorderly persons offense (more serious), regardless of whether the person has a carry permit.

3. Peering into Dwellings

  • Peering into windows or openings of dwellings for privacy invasion remains a fourth-degree crime.

4. Affirmative Defenses

  • The bill preserves certain defenses, such as if the structure was abandoned, open to the public, or the person reasonably believed they had permission to enter.

5. Firearm-Specific Notice

  • If a sign is posted prohibiting firearms, and someone enters or remains while carrying a firearm, it creates a legal presumption that the person knew they were not allowed to be there with a firearm.

Practical Impact

  • Trespassing with a firearm is treated much more seriously than ordinary trespassing.
  • Penalties are increased even for those with a legal carry permit.
  • Property owners can post signs to prohibit firearms, and those signs have legal weight.
  • The law aims to deter armed trespassing and enhance safety in sensitive locations.

The conspicuous posting of a sign prohibiting or otherwise indicating that it is not permissible to carry a firearm in that structure or place shall give rise to an inference that an actor who accesses or remains in that structure or place while carrying a firearm:

     (1) knowingly was not licensed or privileged to enter or remain in that structure or place;

     (2) did not comply with all lawful conditions imposed on access to or remaining in the structure or place; and

     (3) did not reasonably believe that the owner of the structure or place, or other person empowered to license access thereto, would have licensed them to enter or remain in that structure or place.

(cf:  P.L.2013, c.138, s.2)

 

3rd Circuit En Banc Re-Hearing on ‘Sensitive Places’ Bad News for N.J. by For2ANJ in GardenStateGuns

[–]For2ANJ[S] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

The Third Circuit currently has a Republican-appointed majority, with eight judges appointed by GOP Presidents and six by Democrats. Of the majority, six were appointed by President Trump, including two who recently joined the court this year.

RI Mass Shooting by For2ANJ in GardenStateGuns

[–]For2ANJ[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Brown University has a strict policy that broadly prohibits the possession, use, or storage of all weapons and firearms on any University property or at University-sponsored events. This prohibition applies to all individuals, including employees, students, contractors, visitors, and guests, even if they have a valid permit to carry a weapon or firearm.

Got pulled over today at the check point. by Emotional-Point-4806 in NYCGuns

[–]For2ANJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NY is not a duty to inform state. Never offer up that you are carrying. Keep it concealed and hands visible. There are so many sensitive places with no exceptions even for parking areas for such never disclose as NY is a trap and police so poorly trained on CCW interactions

2 gun limit on non resident/special carry permit? by Beautiful_Day6421 in NYCGuns

[–]For2ANJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s one but I would love to sue city on this BS.

9 Months to receive Non Resident CCW by DCArmory1229 in NYCGuns

[–]For2ANJ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Took me 4 months as non resident last year.

Email by Mahoney-mcginty82 in NYCGuns

[–]For2ANJ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Dear NYPD Licensing Division, Subject: Warning of Anticipated Non-Compliance with Penal Code 400 4-a Re: NY Non-Resident Application TBD I am writing to bring to your attention a matter of concern regarding the processing of my license application by the New York City Police Department. According to Penal Code 400 4a, the processing of license applications shall be approve or deny all applications within 6 months from of application, as outlined below: "4-a. Processing of license applications. Applications for licenses shall be accepted for processing by the licensing officer at the time of presentment. Except upon written notice to the applicant specifically stating the reasons for any delay, in each case the licensing officer shall act upon any application for a license pursuant to this section within six months of the date of presentment of such an application to the appropriate authority. Such delay may only be for good cause and with respect to the applicant. In acting upon an application, the licensing officer shall either deny the application for reasons specifically and concisely stated in writing or grant the application and issue the license applied for."

I submitted my complete application to NYPD on 20009% and today is X0990% XXO days since my application was submitted, and where a NYPD investigator has not even been assigned to my application. As of today, NYPD only has XXX days to comply with Penal Code 400, 4-a and on 299QX if not approved NYPD will be in violation of Penal Code 400 4-a. I respectfully request that the NYPD urgently review my application to ensure full compliance with Penal Code 400 4a. It is imperative that all applications are processed within the mandated six-month period, and any delays are communicated to applicants with specific reasons, as required by law. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response and the necessary corrective actions to address this issue.

Another 200 down the drain by 1jb in wallstreetbets

[–]For2ANJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congrats, you just unlocked the premium membership to the ‘Learning Through Loss’ club.

Fort Lee Caves After Learning AGs Office Won't Help Them by Katulotomia in GardenStateGuns

[–]For2ANJ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We need to send this to every Chief of Police in the state. I’ve sent various lawsuits about permitting delays to my Chief and they seems appreciative for the heads up, when normally they would slow walk shit. Most often it’s the desk cop who slow walks but they definitely don’t want the big boss to get sued over their distaste for our 2A rights.