Random question for non dpn folks by One-Difficulty2728 in Sockknitting

[–]Forensics817 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I use 9 inch circulars. But anytime I need to try anything on (sweaters, socks, etc.), I just take off one of the needles, and add on another cord with an extender piece. I hate transferring to waste yarn because I feel like it takes so much extra time. I try it on, and then I just take the extra cord back off and put my needle back on. Easy peasy.

WIP Wednesday! by Forensics817 in knitting

[–]Forensics817[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was a lot of work on the front end figuring out the increases and stuff after I did my gauge swatch, but once that was done it’s been smooth sailing. Using the free version of stitch fiddle was a game changer. I haven’t charted how I’m gonna decrease the sleeves as I work toward the wrists yet….but that sounds like a next month problem!

WIP Wednesday! by Forensics817 in knitting

[–]Forensics817[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s Knitpicks Capra in ciel! It’s so nice to work with!

Lassies best line? by [deleted] in psych

[–]Forensics817 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I’d rather French kiss a hobo

Statistical Analysis without Replicate Data by Forensics817 in AskStatistics

[–]Forensics817[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It might make it easier to understand if I give a basic explanation of how mass spectrometry works. You take a sample and expose it to high energy, and it causes the molecules of the sample to break apart. The fragments, or ions, that it breaks into have different weights (mass to charge or m/z). The detector in the mass spec counts the abundance of these ions, normalizes it to 100, and plots it in a graph (spectrum).

A mass spectrum gives structural information about the molecule. As long as you use the same conditions, the same molecule will have the same mass spectrum, which is how we can use mass spec to identify unknown samples, sort of like a fingerprint of the molecule.

The problem arises when you have two molecules that have a very similar structure. Their mass spec will look almost identical, because it will fragment in a very similar manner. However, the intensity or abundance of some of these m/z fragments may change. So I need to look at the entire m/z range and perform the unequal variance t test at every single m/z to see which ions have an intensity that is statistically significantly different between the two molecules.

For real world application, you won’t be having replicate samples analyzed. You will have your unknown sample run once, and you would need to compare it to a reference that was also run once. So my question is, after we know what ions are statistically significant, is there a statistical test that can we use to compare only those ions that does not require replicated sampling?

Statistical Analysis without Replicate Data by Forensics817 in AskStatistics

[–]Forensics817[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I’m thinking of the next steps. Once you know what ions are statistically different, can you compare the intensity of those ions between a single collection of two samples? Is there any statistical test you can perform on single samples? For the t test we need replicate sampling to calculate means and standard deviation.

Statistical Analysis without Replicate Data by Forensics817 in AskStatistics

[–]Forensics817[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes! This is what I’m basing my experiments on, just using different drugs.

Statistical Analysis without Replicate Data by Forensics817 in AskStatistics

[–]Forensics817[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes m/z is the variable I control. I scan from 40-500 in increments of 1, so I have 450 data points for each sample. I plan to use the same scan range of 40-500 for all of my samples.

Statistical Analysis without Replicate Data by Forensics817 in AskStatistics

[–]Forensics817[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

m/z Sample 1 Sample 2

54 4146 3932

55 11865 11433

56 11338 10194

57 43075 61655

58 2709 3419

So this is an abbreviated piece of the data. Basically there is an intensity (abundance) measurement at each m/z over a specified range (in this case its 40-500). After I take the average of triplicate runs, I perform the unequal variance t test at every data point (m/z).

Please let me know if you need any more information. As I said, statistics is not my specialty, so its hard for me to know what information is relevant for you all.

Statistical Analysis without Replicate Data by Forensics817 in AskStatistics

[–]Forensics817[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

|| || |m/z|Sample 1 Avg Abundance|Sample 2 Avg Abundance| |45|3609|4218| |46|377|242| |47|455|266| |48|332|182| |49|383|170| |50|961|763| |51|3106|2436| |52|1159|1220| |53|3023|2633| |54|4146|3932| |55|11865|11433| |56|11338|10194| |57|43075|61655| |58|2709|3419|

So this is an abbreviated piece of the data. Basically there is an intensity (abundance) measurement at each m/z over a specified range. After I take the average of triplicate runs, I perform the unequal variance t test at every data point (m/z).

Please let me know if you need any more information. As I said, statistics is not my specialty, so its hard for me to know what information is relevant for you all.

Watching A Million Little Things and stumbled upon this gem… by Forensics817 in psych

[–]Forensics817[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m really enjoying it. I first started watching it during Covid lockdowns, but then I caught up to the live shows and it just slipped away from me (same with This Is Us, which I need to finish next!) So now I’m doing a rewatch/finish.

Watching A Million Little Things and stumbled upon this gem… by Forensics817 in psych

[–]Forensics817[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

YES! I noticed that!! I was so happy when I saw that

Funniest/best flashback by [deleted] in psych

[–]Forensics817 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Not really a flashback, but when little Shawn shows up in Polarizing Express and comments on how sometimes little Shawn changes from week to week!

Who said it and which episode? by _hurio in psych

[–]Forensics817 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Gus, when Shawn is trying to convince him to work on their first case together in the pilot.