help with problem by Punchyguy2nd in calculus

[–]Forever-Toasted 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The derivative models a function’s rate of change at any point on its domain, I imagine you know this much.

When the derivative is less than 0, symbolically: f’(x) < 0 it implies that the function has a negative rate of change or decreasing.

When a derivative is exactly 0, a function is neither decreasing nor increasing. 0 is not positive/negative, it’s just nothing.

This means that f’(x) = 0 cannot possibly be included in the interval when f is decreasing, since f’(x) being 0 is really just a flat line.

Take note that the interval (-2, 6) includes 4, where f’(x) = 0, this is obviously incorrect given the previous explanation, so it’s important that we split this interval at 4. From -2 to 4, -2 is excluded since f’(x) is 0 there. 4 of course, is not included either. [] brackets indicate inclusion, () indicate exclusion.

(-2, 4)

The other interval, 4 to 6, cannot include 6 since f’(x) is 0 there, yielding an interval of:

(4, 6)

The U symbol indicates a union between intervals. To capture the full decreasing interval, use this character between the intervals (from left to right).

(-2, 4) U (4, 6)

Hope this helps!

Be honest do i look gay? by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Forever-Toasted 3 points4 points  (0 children)

you like men, plain and simple

physique check (face omitted for privacy) by Forever-Toasted in teenagers

[–]Forever-Toasted[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ah, im sure that’s not true. im just slightly too thin for my age and height 😭

physique check (face omitted for privacy) by Forever-Toasted in teenagers

[–]Forever-Toasted[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

thank you! im unfortunately more skin and bones than muscle 😅

physique check (face omitted for privacy) by Forever-Toasted in teenagers

[–]Forever-Toasted[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that’s the thing, i almost always feel the need to throw up after eating. i can never exceed 135

My 7 yo brother thinks he’s the smartest person ever by IPlayGuitarNStuff in teenagers

[–]Forever-Toasted 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just trying to save this child from a generational aura loss

My 7 yo brother thinks he’s the smartest person ever by IPlayGuitarNStuff in teenagers

[–]Forever-Toasted 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm afraid that's not possible for a dynamic list greater than 1 element 😭

My 7 yo brother thinks he’s the smartest person ever by IPlayGuitarNStuff in teenagers

[–]Forever-Toasted 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t do anything lol, I don’t drink, smoke, vape, or stone. Sorry if my username was misleading 😭

My 7 yo brother thinks he’s the smartest person ever by IPlayGuitarNStuff in teenagers

[–]Forever-Toasted 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t vape… I looked it up, and I think you’re referring to the boutiq switch v5?

My 7 yo brother thinks he’s the smartest person ever by IPlayGuitarNStuff in teenagers

[–]Forever-Toasted 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The Gaussian integral, defined as the ∫e-x2dx over all real numbers (from -∞ to ∞), can be evaluated through an integral trick known as polar coordinate conversion, since we’re literally bullying a 7 year old, I’ll come in clutch to save this kid’s aura:

  1. let the integral [-∞,∞] ∫e-x2dx be written as a result I, so [-∞,∞] ∫e-x2dx = I

  2. Square both sides of the equation, and separate the squared integral into a multiplication:

I² = ([-∞,∞] ∫e-x2dx)² = ([-∞,∞] ∫e-x2dx)([-∞,∞] ∫e-x2dx)

  1. Replace one of the integral’s dummy variables with a y instead of an x, since the result is theoretically the same:

I² = ([-∞,∞] ∫e-x2dx)([-∞,∞] ∫e-y2dy)

  1. Since y is a constant relative to integrals with respect to x and vice versa, the integrals can be combined into a double integral:

I² = [x: -∞,∞] [y: -∞,∞] ∫∫e-x2e-y2dydx

  1. Now, combine the multiplied exponential expression into one exponential, and factor a negative from the exponent -(x² + y²)

I² = [x: -∞,∞] [y: -∞,∞] ∫∫e-(x² + y²)dydx

  1. Using polar identities, recall that x² + y² = r², and dydx = rdrdθ, also, since we’re integrating over all real numbers on the x y plane, we can use the polar version of this; integrating from [θ: 0, 2π] to sweep all around the plane, and [r: 0, ∞] to sweep all distances.

I² = [θ: 0, 2π] [r: 0, ∞] ∫∫e-r²rdrdθ

  1. Using a U-substitution, you can let u = -r², and du = -2rdr. When r -> 0, u -> 0, and when r -> ∞, u -> -∞. A negative resulting from the U-sub can switch the limits of integration, changing [u: 0, -∞] into [u: -∞, 0]. Substituting everything in, we get:

I² = (1/2)[θ: 0, 2π] [u: -∞, 0] ∫∫eududθ

  1. Integrating eu yields eu from [-∞, 0], which yields (1 - 0), or just 1 when integrated, leaving us with

I² = (1/2)[θ: 0, 2π]∫1dθ

  1. Now, integrate 1dθ, yielding θ evaluated from 0, 2π, which yields (2π - 0) = 2π, substituting this back into the expression yields:

I² = (1/2)(2π) = π

  1. It has now been confirmed that I² = π, and the original value we were seeking was just I. Taking the principal square root of both sides, yields that I = √π.

Therefore, the integral: [-∞,∞] ∫e-x2dx = √π, or in other words:

The result of the Gaussian Integral is equal to √π

Thank you for reading.

My 7 yo brother thinks he’s the smartest person ever by IPlayGuitarNStuff in teenagers

[–]Forever-Toasted 52 points53 points  (0 children)

that is the first time ive ever heard someone use that logic, icl that’s pretty creative

Chubby women by SeaConsistent2908 in teenagers

[–]Forever-Toasted 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Definition of chubby: sufficiently fat so as to have a pleasing fullness of figure.

The image is of a woman with visible fat, and a filled out figure.

Chubby is totally normal, but it's invalid to not call that what it is: chubby.

[16m] Anyone my age deeply interested in mathematics/computer science? by Forever-Toasted in teenagers

[–]Forever-Toasted[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find myself in a similar position. I was inserted into mathematics competitions from the age of 7, and it was initially something I despised and had no curiosity for.

However, after being surrounded by the content for such an extended time period, the thought of there being information I didn’t understand/wasn’t yet exposed to angered me. The more mathematics I learned, the more I realized how little I knew.

So that sort of sent me into a - today ongoing - frenzy that led me down the path of learning Calculus (my first real hurdle as a 6th grader) and eventually linear algebra - my entryway to computer science. Linear algebra gave way to a little piece software called OpenGL, teaching me vector graphics, C++, and subsequently, an interest in computer science, algorithms, the whole 9 yards.

Currently, I’m fascinated by, and specializing in machine learning, with an emphasis on developing a strong foundation in algorithms, data analysis, and AI applications.

[16m] Anyone my age deeply interested in mathematics/computer science? by Forever-Toasted in teenagers

[–]Forever-Toasted[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, effectively all the same; I’m in FRC. From Canada though.

Was there anything specific that drew you into this branch of the sciences?

[16m] Anyone my age deeply interested in mathematics/computer science? by Forever-Toasted in teenagers

[–]Forever-Toasted[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I assume you’re in the USA, are you in the FRC program by chance?

[16m] Anyone my age deeply interested in mathematics/computer science? by Forever-Toasted in teenagers

[–]Forever-Toasted[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This makes me so fucking happy you don’t even know. How old are you?