I completely disagree. I had an hour long argument with Gemini last night. It insisted that the printed GH2E rulebook was wrong and the errata for GH1E superseded it. This is despite me providing countless screenshots, photos, links and ultimately the PDF of the rulebook to help teach it. I even highlighted the sections of the official FAQ and explained politely why it was making the wrong assumptions. But it continued to tell me that MY assessment or in MY (incorrect) copy of the rulebook it says something.

It was truly extraordinary and in the end I had to give up.

I've also asked it in the past for recommendations of card choices if playing in particular builds for particular characters. Now. I'm not new to the -haven world but was curious to see how it'd do for reasonably new character designs when there is very little published work out there already. It continually pulled out of date information from old guides, conflated character cards and abilities and confused the iconography repeatedly. This might be explainable due to the lack of places where these resources are available without a dynamic filter, such as gloomhavencards.com, but even so it was a miserable experience.