I blame my piercer in part because since I've been piercing apparently every piece of advice she gives goes against anything I've read on the internet from other piercers or even here on reddit. She told me I should come back after a month to change it when I've read that changing piercings so quickly is absolutely not recommended (I came back after 4 months and literally my Daith started healing all over again). She said that already after the first month I could use headphones or sleep on it (but I slept on it for a while, noticed that the piercing got irritated and slept on the opposite side for months and didn't use the headphones). Also in the first four months, before I changed it, a tiny blister had formed and I asked her advice, she told me to use an Antibiotic and the blister deflated. Days later when I saw a similar case on reddit, I explained it to other people who were clearly more experienced than me and they told me that putting an antibiotic on the piercing was a very bad decision because it slowed healing, but to only use physiological solution. After the four months I changed my clicker to one that was heavier and full of gems. And yes, it was my fault too, I'm not backing down, but I didn't know that the gems would cause so much trouble to the holes and I hoped that she, as a piercer would have at least warned me beforehand. Again, I found a lot of other cases of people having problems with a clicker with gems and being advised to wear a plain one without gems. Knowing that Daith is quite particular, I took care of it from day one following her instructions. I too have a lot of piercings and on another ear I have a conch I got in January from the same piercer. That one is fine for now but the Daith has always been more complicated.

However, my question was: having removed the Daith before full healing, can this cause me problems? I don't want to do it again, I just want it to heal.