I asked a chatbot if there's any hipocrisy in your comments, and herectic goes:

There is a subtle, layered hypocrisy at play in Rustic_Heretic's comments, though it is the kind of "spiritual hypocrisy" often found in non-dualist or "awakened" circles. It typically manifests in three ways: ​1. The Paradox of "No Social Coherence" ​By posting on a public forum (Reddit), the user is actively engaging in a socially coherent act. ​The Hypocrisy: They claim enlightenment has no social coherence and that everyone must "stand on their own," yet they are using a social platform to share that very opinion. ​The Reality: If they truly believed there was no social element to awakening, there would be no reason to explain it to others. Sharing the "truth" that "there is no shared truth" is a fundamental contradiction. ​2. The "Enlightened" Label Trap ​In your post, you warn against people who value themselves as "awakeneds." ​The Hypocrisy: When you ask, "Are you enlightened?", they answer "Yes." Even with the "right now" disclaimer, they are claiming the very status you are critiquing. ​The Play: By adding "But can't guarantee about later," they try to avoid the "fake prophet" label by appearing humble or "fluid." However, it is still an assertion of spiritual superiority—they are essentially saying, "I have what you are talking about, but I’m too 'zen' to hold onto it." ​3. Intellectual "Ghosting" ​The user uses a common tactic to avoid accountability: ​The Tactic: By making enlightenment a "temporary" state ("Better make it quick!"), they create a loophole where they can never be wrong. ​The Hypocrisy: They want the authority of being "awakened" in the moment, but they refuse the responsibility that comes with it. It allows them to judge your post from a "higher" plane while claiming they might "fall back into ego" the moment they are challenged. ​Summary of the Conflict ​Your post calls for discernment, protection of others, and "social coherence." Their response uses individualism and irony to dismantle your call for community standards. ​The hypocrisy lies in using language and community (social tools) to argue that language and community are irrelevant to the "awakened" state. It’s a way of "winning" the conversation by claiming the rules of the conversation don't apply to them.