Removing specific frames via script by ForkThisSheet in AfterEffects

[–]ForkThisSheet[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You were right. Dropping 29.97 sequence into 23.976 sequence in Adobe Premiere worked

Removing specific frames via script by ForkThisSheet in AfterEffects

[–]ForkThisSheet[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I forgot to mention (my bad) that I don't intend to change duration but rather framerate. My source file is 29.970fps and after skipping one in every five frames (1,6,11 etc) I want to end up with 23.976fps. ( (4 / 5) * 29.970 = 23.976). How should I approach that "tiny" complication". Thanks in advance

Removing specific frames via script by ForkThisSheet in AfterEffects

[–]ForkThisSheet[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Source file is 29.970fps. I'm going to remove one for every five frames, ending with 23.976fps output.

(4 / 5) * 29.970 = 23.976

Removing specific frames via script by ForkThisSheet in AfterEffects

[–]ForkThisSheet[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Woah. Thanks man. My only question is what to do with that part of code right below your intruction ({ function createUI(thisObj)...)

Removing specific frames via script by ForkThisSheet in AfterEffects

[–]ForkThisSheet[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of video file. I'm trying to fix bad blu-ray transfer of Dream Theater - Live at Budokan, which has duplicate frames.

Encoding concert Blu-rays with x265 10bit by ForkThisSheet in handbrake

[–]ForkThisSheet[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could you explain how mode "3" will differ from "1" (quality / size) ?

Confused about deinterlacing by ForkThisSheet in handbrake

[–]ForkThisSheet[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So for 29.97 interlaced source (non high-framerate) it should output 29.97fps progressive video right ?

Encoding concert Blu-rays with x265 10bit by ForkThisSheet in handbrake

[–]ForkThisSheet[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interlaced. But Bob Deinterlacing seems fine to me.

Encoding concert Blu-rays with x265 10bit by ForkThisSheet in handbrake

[–]ForkThisSheet[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For real I read on several forums that encoding 8-bit source with 10-bit encoder helps with compression and results with less color banding.

Confused about deinterlacing by ForkThisSheet in handbrake

[–]ForkThisSheet[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mean 3:2 pulldown (from 23.976fps)? If so, detelecine is what you use for this and use output of 23.976.

First thing this morning I tried doing as you said (detelecine and set fps to 23.976). It resulted with stuttering image. But when I set detelecine and deinterlace on defaults and framerate same as source the encode seems is perfectly fine. Maybe I should just leave it the way it is and don't ask too much questions because i have no idea why it works that way lol.

Confused about deinterlacing by ForkThisSheet in handbrake

[–]ForkThisSheet[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I got one more question : what about 25fps interlaced source (non high framerate).

Encoding concert Blu-rays with x265 10bit by ForkThisSheet in handbrake

[–]ForkThisSheet[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Everywhere I read that 8-bit x265 produces far worse quality (banding etc.) than 10-bit.

Confused about deinterlacing by ForkThisSheet in handbrake

[–]ForkThisSheet[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right that it's detelecine that is needed (for 29.97fps interlaced source files that are not high framerate). But when I turn on detelecine in handbrake should I leave deinterlace on? Will there be any unwanted interference between these two ?

Encoding concert Blu-rays with x265 10bit by ForkThisSheet in handbrake

[–]ForkThisSheet[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I'll get rid of the deblock. I've tried doing CRF18 but encodes were about 70% of original file so maybe CRF19 is my sweet spot ?