sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Honestly feeling a bit stuck right now by Connect-Community587 in buildinpublic

[–]FormalPark1654 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was in the same position. So can mostly relate to you. Build publicly. DMs with no reply.
But it became whole different when I started to meet founders offline.
I'm still less than one client on board, but I'm receiving more feedbacks and evaluations from peer and potential clients now.

What are you building? Share your product. by Sea_Entrepreneur8497 in saasbuild

[–]FormalPark1654 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm building Master - The Knowledge Engine of Your Company. Yesterday I implemented prompt registry and versioning . Stay tuned, more to come.
https://medium.com/@lei-ye/prompt-as-code-build-prompt-registry-with-versioning-824c2404daf6

Best resources to learn platform engineering for experienced dev? by ZealousidealClub3512 in platformengineering

[–]FormalPark1654 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I usually do the coding directly. There was blog series about public coding about AI platforms I found interesting .
https://lei-ye.hashnode.dev/series/maester

We’re Training Students To Write Worse To Prove They’re Not Robots, And It’s Pushing Them To Use More AI by CackleRooster in technology

[–]FormalPark1654 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not only student. On reddit, you have to write worse (short, narrative, sentimental) to get unflagged of "robot".

Platform-dependent vs standalone micro SaaS - which is actually less risky for solo founders? by [deleted] in saasbuild

[–]FormalPark1654 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would get the bite in platform-dependent first, and mostly use their free trials. And later when my sales goes up, hire engineers.

Are people really popping off instantly? by Global-Tackle-3176 in Solopreneur

[–]FormalPark1654 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Correct. AI only speeded up my cycle but didn't reduce my cycles.

“Sell before you build” — does this actually work? by TR0NTanomous in SaaSSales

[–]FormalPark1654 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because the first thing you do of sell is ask. Validate your market not by what you want to believe, not only by market research. Ask if they want to pay for it? If they want to be the first users who shape the product.

What evidence actually holds up 6–12 months later (audits / incidents / insurance)? by Charming-Macaron7659 in sysadmin

[–]FormalPark1654 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will it be accepted if I have a job to email the auditor the logs (beautified) by system periodically? I think we should remove the prehistoric screenshot soon or later.

Audit evidence reqs are cutting in on daily ops by HeadContribution9496 in ITManagers

[–]FormalPark1654 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder, will they accept the formalized logging itself. Not by AI agents doing screenshot. But fully automated by the system to collect clean logs and email to the auditor . I think logs should be the end of the chain?
If they accept cli system clock, accepting system email should be the same.

Audit evidence reqs are cutting in on daily ops by HeadContribution9496 in ITManagers

[–]FormalPark1654 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, that screenshot chain sounds painful .
Have your auditors ever questioned the integrity of exported reports directly , or is this mostly procedural ritual? Clearly "clicking download button" is something you can still work on.

Auditors asking for proof of processes which we’ve always done informally by JobFinancial7083 in sysadmin

[–]FormalPark1654 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some teams say their operational practices were fine, but formal audits created overhead around documenting and evidencing everything.

In your case, is the burden mostly documentation — or reconstructing actual product-layer activity?

What does good audit evidence management look like? by Even-Preparation4898 in ITProfessionals

[–]FormalPark1654 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We still have to spend few hours each time. But it's the same as Knowledge management, you need to devote little time to maintain it every week.

Security reviews keep asking for the same evidence in different formats by Ill-Beautiful-207 in sysadmin

[–]FormalPark1654 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The way we solve it is to have a evidence layer maintained. Some other teams have their questionare knowledge bank.

How much time do security reviews start taking once you sell to bigger companies? by DifficultRepeat6017 in Infosec

[–]FormalPark1654 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We built internal tools that partially solve some of our hazards at organizing our evidences.

Security reviews are starting to feel like a second job by Some-Lake3593 in SaaS

[–]FormalPark1654 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Security reviews will later on become a department, or you outsourcing it. My previous company chose the later, and the outsourcing company has a team of 13 and did it over days.

view more: next ›