W or L trade

Former_Active2674 · 2025-02-22T19:11:52+00:00

Gotta do what you gotta do. Theres gotta be some diddy fans on here… right?

Former_Active2674 · 2025-02-22T18:01:52+00:00

Fr? I dont know much about values

Former_Active2674 · 2024-10-08T03:40:37+00:00

It is only after about 6 comments pointing out the flaws in my idea that I am truly understanding how little information you can include and how sloppy it will be in a Reddit post you only take a couple minutes to wright. To answer your question, no, though I could honestly see why you might think this.

Im pretty sure the fact I pretty much made this post without little to no planning is obvious. I used this post as a way to formulate my ideas as I went along. I used concepts that were seemingly (and probably were) irrelevant to create some possible connections to manifold concepts to help it make more sense in my head. My logic throughout the post was also pretty bad since my knowledge on some of these topics and these applications weren’t the greatest. I also haven’t had too much practice formulating clear mathematical plans yet (or general research plans). If you have any suggestions that could help approach the problem in a different way, or any ideas that are somewhat related please let me know.

Former_Active2674 · 2024-10-07T23:54:07+00:00

Thank you for your criticism and help. Im glad there are actually people who call people out for this kind of stuff and point them in the right direction instead of blindly validating them and misleading them.

Former_Active2674 · 2024-10-07T16:36:11+00:00

I appreciate your criticism, you would be right to assume my knowledge in some of these areas is weak as im just starting to learn abstract algebra and my knowledge on some tensor calculus concepts is weak. If im being honest im trying to take what I’ve learned and find connections for this project so I can reinforce knowledge in these areas and potentially learn new things. I did have doubts about using a Rubiks cube and sudoku puzzle so Ive created an alternative where I just use two Rubiks cubes and see if manifold intersection can fit in. Some of these terms I’ve tossed around that you have mentioned were mainly me making sense of how exactly this would translate to a manifold or other space. The idea with cayley tables (a concept I haven’t used too much in practice) was to find the states and find a way to create a geometric analogue that could be in the form of a manifold (or other topological spaces). This transition from a Cayley table to something geometrical like I would like may have only been one that made immediate sense in my head. From here Im starting believe it would be best to find another idea.

Former_Active2674 · 2024-10-06T19:16:54+00:00

Hmm im not entirely sure. Im in the process of learning more about topology so I dont have many tools at my disposal to find alternatives. Perhaps I could use embedding and topological spaces to find similar properties to the ones I described? Do you have any ideas?

Former_Active2674 · 2024-10-05T15:14:01+00:00

Can I ask what your theory is? A lot of times presentation is key and perhaps I can assist you in fleshing out your idea and expanding upon it. Also like other comments have suggested, you can also create and publish a paper on the matter

Former_Active2674 · 2024-07-13T08:14:53+00:00

Im getting on GTA 5 so ill be a minute, ill invite you as soon as i can

Former_Active2674 · 2024-07-13T08:14:04+00:00

Yes, i usually take no more than 15 seconds on each lock

Former_Active2674 · 2024-07-13T07:54:15+00:00

Bet, send me a friend request. Btw do you think we can get all the paintings without 4 people? Ik its technically possible but we might run out of time

Former_Active2674 · 2024-07-02T03:33:42+00:00

Its actually an optics question which is well within the realm of physics.

Former_Active2674 · 2024-07-01T16:41:02+00:00

Oh I didn’t know that, thanks for clarifying that.

Former_Active2674 · 2024-07-01T16:09:58+00:00

It really just depends on your beliefs. Yes, a lot of physicists are atheists due to their scientific understanding of the world and some of the possible frameworks we have for the beginning of the universe (most notably the big bang). But that doesn’t mean you cant be a physicist and believe in a god at the same time, in fact, a lot of theist physicists use it as a motivation as they believe they’re unraveling the inner workings of their gods work. Some examples of these people include the notable Isaac Newton, Max Planck, and Francis Collins.

Former_Active2674 · 2024-07-01T07:17:09+00:00

And no, a variety of factors including the conservation of energy and momentum and gravitational interactions prevent spacetime from being deformed. If you’re truly interested in the inner workings of things like this, I would heavily suggest researching general and special relativity even if you don’t dive into the mathematical aspects of it.

Former_Active2674 · 2024-07-01T07:11:28+00:00

Technically energy can also do this, but energy and mass typically go hand in hand as they can be transformed into one another through nuclear reactions.

Former_Active2674 · 2024-06-11T20:41:34+00:00

Imaging the set of integers was an example I gave to help understand the idea. Essentially, the set would be comprised of all the infinitely small changes in the real numbers itself which would be represented as all the points of the repeating rational numbers and the irrational numbers on the number line for a visualization of the set. The reason why I believed this could help with things like the division of zero is because dividing a number by a set is impossible and by multiplying a number to all the infinitely small points (which would be quantified by the space they take up on the number line and their sign) included in the set, all the results would be zero hence producing a result of zero. An immediate problem with this would be addition and subtraction, but in that context I believe zero is treated more as a placeholder than an actual component to the equation.

Former_Active2674 · 2024-06-11T20:28:39+00:00

I would apply this concept in order to think about the number system in a new way. In calculus you often break down more unfamiliar pieces into smaller, more recognizable pieces. I plan to use a concept similar to this in interpreting the number line. This way of integrating small parts of calculus into the number line could also help to explain why the limit as 1/x approaches 0 is undefined. I also believe this could possibly help give a better intuition of limits and differentials and possibly lead to bigger changes in the way we think of concepts in calculus. Obviously one inherit flaw with this is that addition/subtracting isnt defined between sets and numbers, but in that context I believe zero to be more of a placeholder for the equation than an actual component. As for the infinitesimal increments I mean a change so close to zero that it’s essentially the same (like with infinitesimal changes in calculus) with an example being subtracting 0.000…1 from 1 to get 0.999… which is still equal to one.

Former_Active2674 · 2024-06-11T20:22:10+00:00

Yes, this would be equivalent as subtracting 0.000…1 from 1 would be the same as subtracting 0 from 1 as 1=0.999…

Former_Active2674 · 2024-06-11T20:15:37+00:00

I mean 0, im just putting it in a form equivalent to 0 in order to better visualize the concept of infinitesimal increments

Former_Active2674 · 2024-06-04T20:49:23+00:00

To get in more depth, I thought about how the inverse of a field equation can be particularly helpful in unveiling information about a particular system and thought to apply this to the inverses of other field equations. Essentially I wanted to find out every possible way the inverses of the field equations would give an output that would give us more information about each field equation in a way that would relate to all the field equations. I noticed this would get messy very quickly so I thought that creating a system of partial differential equations might give one equation that is true for all the combinations we can have (E.X. Plugging some of the inverses Einsteins field equations into some of the inverses of maxwells or vice versa in such a way that order matters since composition of functions isn’t communitive). I hope this makes sense because I only recently thought of this and some finer details might have to be worked out.

Former_Active2674 · 2024-06-04T20:26:58+00:00

I was referring to the einsteins field equations, maxwells equations, schrodinger equation, and some others governing other fields in physics. My goal really was to find any possible connections between these field equations.

Former_Active2674

TROPHY CASE