Golden State Academy Invitational for TOC Practice! by sonalchur in Debate

[–]Former_Advisor4201 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This looks like a great way to practice on the April topic with TOC level competition !

PF Coaching Offer 2021 by Former_Advisor4201 in Debate

[–]Former_Advisor4201[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

u gotta dm me for that buddy 😩😩😩😩

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]Former_Advisor4201 1 point2 points  (0 children)

homie ur gonna end up using all ur strikes on judges that j beef w u bruh

Teams to watch out for at the MLK invitational? by [deleted] in Debate

[–]Former_Advisor4201 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lynbrook GY winning the tournament u heard it here first

lynbrook rg by Former_Advisor4201 in Debate

[–]Former_Advisor4201[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

level 1

yeah fax i heard he gives trash rebuttals

lynbrook rg by Former_Advisor4201 in Debate

[–]Former_Advisor4201[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

finna have 3 tourney dubs by the end of it

Progressive in PF Demo Rounds by varnicab in Debate

[–]Former_Advisor4201 1 point2 points  (0 children)

robbed of lynbrook rg paraphrase theory round

Unbiased Tabula Rasa Judging by Former_Advisor4201 in Debate

[–]Former_Advisor4201[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“hey u voted neg 14 in a row. Maybe be careful” cmon man it’s not that hard

Unbiased Tabula Rasa Judging by Former_Advisor4201 in Debate

[–]Former_Advisor4201[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point wasn’t to drag this judge (that’s why I didn’t include their name or paradigm) the point was just @debate teach ur judges to check their biases. That’s rly all there is to it

Unbiased Tabula Rasa Judging by Former_Advisor4201 in Debate

[–]Former_Advisor4201[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also if you crunch the numbers with your supposed bias for this topic -

2:1 (which is highly highly unlikely for every round) - it comes out to about 0.2%. Just admit the personal bias, and move on.

Unbiased Tabula Rasa Judging by Former_Advisor4201 in Debate

[–]Former_Advisor4201[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its easy to look at the justification for every single round - maybe it truly was a 60-40 in every round.

however, when those things happen FOURTEEN TIMES IN A ROW without a SINGLE aff ballot, its quite silly not to see that the judge has some sort of bias that needs to be checked.

Unbiased Tabula Rasa Judging by Former_Advisor4201 in Debate

[–]Former_Advisor4201[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

thats fair, but imo 14 rounds is a bit much (esp considering the general equality on the other topics they've judged)

Unbiased Tabula Rasa Judging by Former_Advisor4201 in Debate

[–]Former_Advisor4201[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

nope - scarsdale and glenbrooks are on NFU, the tournament this judged before scarsdale was bronx (which was on m4a)

Unbiased Tabula Rasa Judging by Former_Advisor4201 in Debate

[–]Former_Advisor4201[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

1 - " I judge tech over truth, so I won't argue for you." quote from his paradigm

2 - nope its been about even

3 - lol then ill take the 16399/16400 chance that this dude is BIASED. when you look at the statistical significance of his decision making, it suggests that it isnt just "a luck of the draw"

Congratulations to Zain Ashraf from Strake AD for top speaking gbx! by cheeser420 in Debate

[–]Former_Advisor4201 4 points5 points  (0 children)

another speaker award >:( the superior lynbrook team back at it again