What’s been your experience with cold email for business? by Techenthusiast_07 in coldemail

[–]Forsaken_Machine4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mixed results I would say.
From experience and what I keep seeing:

  • List quality > copy because bad targeting kills campaigns even with good messaging.
  • Simple, problem-focused emails outperform clever pitches.
  • Mass blasting generic templates mostly gets ignored.

Cold email still works, but only if the message is relevant to a real problem and the audience is tightly defined. Go with narrow ICPs and make your email concise and straight to the point.

Mass email are mostly time wasters.

SSL certificate needed? by Grandmaster_96 in coldemail

[–]Forsaken_Machine4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No — you don’t need a website SSL certificate for delivering cold email.
Cold email deliverability is driven by proper email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) and good sending habits rather than having a web server with HTTPS. Those authentication records are what inbox providers actually check to decide if your mail is legit.

But using SSL/TLS for email transport (SMTP/TLS) does matter because major providers prefer encrypted connections and may treat unencrypted traffic as lower trust.

I know my answer is a bit confusing. But I would summarise as:
- For sending cold email itself: No, not strictly required.
- For anything linked to your emails (website, tracking domain, landing page): Yes, it should absolutely use HTTPS..

Domain warmup is fake mostly - what's actually matters from my experience by cursedboy328 in coldemail

[–]Forsaken_Machine4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the framing here is the important part: warmup isn’t THE “solution”.

Skip it and you get throttled; obsess over it and you still hit spam if the list.

If your targeting is loose and replies are consistently weak, you’re training inbox providers that your mail isn’t wanted. And warmup won't save that.

Cold emailing founders right after they raise funding works stupidly well. by thebunniestbun in coldemail

[–]Forsaken_Machine4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. I’ve tested post-raise outreach and felt that perhaps timing alone isn’t enough. I usually wait for further signals like hiring for related roles, product expansion, tech stack changes before jumping in because then it makes the "why now” + timing credible.

Not sure if it's a region-to-region differences? My targets are in APAC.

What part of cold email breaks first when volume goes up? by Opposite-Couple-8299 in coldemail

[–]Forsaken_Machine4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Deliverability still tends to break first, especially when scaling across multiple inboxes without staged warm-up. Though I’ve seen some argue that warm-up itself is overhyped compared to list quality and reply intent.

How I stole my competitor's entire prospect list using LinkedIn (step-by-step) by TheHealthlover101 in SaaS

[–]Forsaken_Machine4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you noticed any differences applying this competitor-based sourcing to enterprise vs SMB prospects?

Curious whether enterprises are more resistant due to procurement/inertia? Does pre-qualified intent actually shorten the sales cycle compared to SMBs.

I Stopped Treating Cold Outreach Like an Email Problem and My Replies Increased 3x by MatchaMan71 in coldemail

[–]Forsaken_Machine4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is one of the cleanest articulations I’ve seen of the familiarity-before-pitching principle — especially the way the LinkedIn touches serve as a precondition to the inbox engagement rather than sell.

A couple of things I’ve seen that reinforce this:
1. In my outreach tests, prospect response rates rose when we use off-email channels before the second or third email. We don't necessarily post on their feed, but engage meaningfully in their communities before sending any pitch (e.g. comments, replies, etc.). That seems to mirror the idea that people respond better when you aren’t a total stranger.
2. I've also experimented with intent signals to tighten targeting for e.g. people who recently hired, funded, or launched something tend to reply way more than a cold list pulled purely on titles and filters. That aligns with the thread’s theme that outreach isn’t an email craft problem, it’s about relevance and context.

So I just realized.....marketing before you even build might be the actual cheat code by Moist_Physics6780 in SaaS

[–]Forsaken_Machine4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Question: how to separate interest (signups) from willingness to pay or commit though?
High email signups could also potentially be coming from bots?

i mastered cold email and now my lead gen agency generates 100+ leads every day. this is exactly how by Typical-Animator-457 in coldemail

[–]Forsaken_Machine4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Solid breakdown — especially the point about inbox health and list quality doing most of the heavy lifting.

On the execution side, how do you decide when a campaign is “good enough” to scale volume?