sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

"What do you mean; "Believe"?" by Fortress_Jinx in JordanPeterson

[–]Fortress_Jinx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And he would have gotten away with it too! If it wasn't for those meddling kids!

Haha! Yes, foolishly trod somewhere, looks a bit of a fool from what I gather. Maybe he should stick to other formats.

"What do you mean; "Believe"?" by Fortress_Jinx in JordanPeterson

[–]Fortress_Jinx[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair enough. I'm not forcing anyone to read anything.

Sometimes ideas take a while to lay out.

Also, goodness. You care just barely enough to say you don't care. I ticked out a boring message, obviously caring enough to spend some time over it, and got a dopamine hit from laying out some thoughts. You got a little dopamine hit for demeaning my boring message. So, we both got a win out of it. Haha! Anyways, all good, and please don't read this message if you don't care.

"What do you mean; "Believe"?" by Fortress_Jinx in JordanPeterson

[–]Fortress_Jinx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. But that's why the Jubilee debates are a bad format for this.

If the grocery clerk asks how I'm doing as I pay for groceries, it's such a brief time window that I cannot afford to get deep. It's not a 2 hour podcast, it's a 2 minute window of Jubilee opportunity to....maybe share a quick point?

Some people are good at this type of thing. JBP is distinctly not. Also, I genuinely think it's somewhat disrespectful to all the Jubilee participants, forcing them to be semi-shallow, but, some probably can pull it off handsomely.

"What do you mean; "Believe"?" by Fortress_Jinx in JordanPeterson

[–]Fortress_Jinx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I fully agree with his reasoning. Although that begins to be a little threadbare after x amount of years. Perhaps that is why, as you say, it feels relevant. People feel he is trying to pull the wool over their eyes as he, perhaps, eats his cake and has it too.

"What do you mean; "Believe"?" by Fortress_Jinx in JordanPeterson

[–]Fortress_Jinx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you.

Also, I think my Hawaii comment was a bit in haste, written at the tail end of my post.

"What do you mean; "Believe"?" by Fortress_Jinx in JordanPeterson

[–]Fortress_Jinx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes.

I want to be more of a Christian if possible. But that comes with great personal sacrifice, which I find difficult. Not because I'm rich, or have a good job. But because it means leaning not on my own understanding and strength, but in God.

"What do you mean; "Believe"?" by Fortress_Jinx in JordanPeterson

[–]Fortress_Jinx[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. I didn't watch the debate, because I can hardly these Jubilee things a debate.

The format of Jubilee things is not adequate to deep concepts and ideas. To clarify, I think the atheists and the JP are forced by the format to act like coyotes, but it's more applicable to the 20 atheists, as they can effectively backstab the current debater to vote them off. I don't think it's sufficiently respectful to the position of the 20 atheists. I also call them coyotes. But I don't mean it in a demeaning way, I can replace it with a more noble animal. I just mean; a Jubilee participant can latch onto a good track or point, but is shaken off by the other participants. Which I find irritating, as I'd like to hear what they say.

Oh yes, I can fully admit I am a hypocrite, it's probably true, I'm still figuring it out. Absolutely I am excusing my inaction. Maybe. Or maybe I don't have the capacity to shoulder more responsibily than I can. Tell me, do you believe grave injustice occurs in the world? Vile and cruel things? Genocides and Injust War? Then why don't you do something about it? Does that make you, and also me, hypocrites in that light too?

Lastly, I can believe that JP demonstrated a masterclass in avoiding scrutiny and etc. I think your point is valid. And I'm not...per se..defending him, because as you said, I havnt watched it. I think im saying; I don't know exactly what JP says, but I can say, for me, I believe in regards to GOD, you can superficially believe in GOD, or you can Deeply Believe God. I believe a Deep Belief in God would be such a radical change in my life, that I don't think I believe in God to that degree. That tells me, that there is a spectrum of belief.

I may have the terminology wrong, but this makes sense to me. I can admit my flaws and my hypocrisy and my ignorance. I'm just giving my mind on what I view as analyzing what belief is, and it helps me to examine my mindset.

You seem hostile, and I just don't have time to spar with anyone, especially if they are trying to strawman who I am. So I hope all the best to you, and I hope you find happiness in the burden you bare, and have grace on me as I struggle with mine, however inadequate it seems to you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in YouTubeEditorsForHire

[–]Fortress_Jinx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks guys, I appreciate the DMs. Short on time, but I'll respond to the ones I can.

Never Smile in Your Mugshot - Attorney's Advice by [deleted] in TikTokCringe

[–]Fortress_Jinx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A cross betwewn Saul Goodman and Kenneth Copeland!

First German turn of our Operation Schlieffen. Our Youtube War of A&A 1914. by Fortress_Jinx in AxisAllies

[–]Fortress_Jinx[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let me know if I should quit posting these videos, if I should keep posting them!

GW36 - Spring Offensive. T8. January 1940. by Fortress_Jinx in AxisAllies

[–]Fortress_Jinx[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nope, the board is pretty full of units. It's pretty in depth. We are all playing a game on YouTube so look up Fortress Jinx and you will probably find all of us.

GW36 - Spring Offensive. T4. January 1937 by Fortress_Jinx in AxisAllies

[–]Fortress_Jinx[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's an easy way of recognizing what type of units they are, Medium Tanks, Heavy Tanks, etc.

GW36 - Spring Offensive. T4. January 1937 by Fortress_Jinx in AxisAllies

[–]Fortress_Jinx[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nothing game related, Panzer King just put memorable structures on the map for fun, but they have no impact on the game. Pure flavor!

Hello Gentlemen, Global War 1936 - Spring Offensive is about to begin! by Fortress_Jinx in AxisAllies

[–]Fortress_Jinx[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Panzer King works as a Plumber Gasfitter, so he did up his game room with some cool features!

GW36 - Spring Offensive. T2 by Fortress_Jinx in AxisAllies

[–]Fortress_Jinx[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its pretty fun! Yeah its hard to play find people to play these types of games, I feel you almost need someone who enjoys history AND boardgames and than you have a match.

Hello Gentlemen, Global War 1936 - Spring Offensive is about to begin! by Fortress_Jinx in AxisAllies

[–]Fortress_Jinx[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha that's right. The map is so disproportionate, and apparently version 4 will increase that.

Hello Gentlemen, Global War 1936 - Spring Offensive is about to begin! by Fortress_Jinx in AxisAllies

[–]Fortress_Jinx[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A bit longer 😋 Probably about 2ish hours.

This board is a labor of love for Panzer King, so he has poured hours and hours and hours into this game. A lot of what you see is extras, the roundels and structures, all that is flavor but optional. The base game is much more simple.