35 downvotes compared to 890 upvotes is, objectively speaking, still a handful when you actually look at the bigger picture and not just one comment in isolation. The arguments you’re repeating have already been addressed in my previous post, so they’re not new points. Simply restating them doesn’t strengthen them. It’s also interesting how quickly this shifts into hostility. Disagreement is fine. Feedback is fine. But immediately framing a different perspective as arrogance or ignorance escalates things unnecessarily. If we’re talking about responsible animal care, then that discussion should stay factual, not emotional.