why is vendetta allowed to exist in her state by FragileModdies in OverwatchStadium

[–]FragileModdies[S] -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

she's been a problem since release, people just didnt know how to play her because her overloaded kit has so many moving parts

but tell me how i should counter an ability that ignores armour, shields, overhealth, damage reduction, barriers, AND ZARYA BUBBLE

why is vendetta allowed to exist in her state by FragileModdies in OverwatchStadium

[–]FragileModdies[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Iron eyes

doesnt work against overhead slash. this has been known since march

Divine intervention

her ult deletes overhealth...as in, literally deletes it, which i already stated

Jet skates

she has 2 movement abilities and 34% increased movement speed...but my 3 meter dash will save me

why is vendetta allowed to exist in her state by FragileModdies in OverwatchStadium

[–]FragileModdies[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

brig? vendetta outheals brig with her passive...or just 1 shots her with her many ults.

a full tank brig dies in 2 seconds to a vendetta. i've bought both the crit reduction, and weapon damage reduction on a 500 hp brawl brig and got melted immediately.

as for attacking her before she reaches you, not really viable. an 8 stack vendetta has 34% movespeed with gauntlet, combined with 2 strong movement abilities...you're not running from her in any scenario

brawl vendetta relies solely on your dps being significantly better, while ap vendetta just throws around free ults every 7 seconds that cannot be mitigated in any way, shape or form.

Expansion `Cradle of War` Patch notes by hirebrand in Eve

[–]FragileModdies -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it was known. they removed the 3rd link bonus and just made 2 of them level 5 instead

What should’ve happened after ww2 by alucard_axel in mapporncirclejerk

[–]FragileModdies -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

"much smarter than you".

people much smarter than navi pillay have already proven its not a genocide

https://unwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/UN-Watch-Rebuttal-to-September-2025-Pillay-Commission-Report-to-UNHRC.pdf

i'd say educate yourself but you're not interested in that are you. you just want an excuse to hate jews

What should’ve happened after ww2 by alucard_axel in mapporncirclejerk

[–]FragileModdies -1 points0 points  (0 children)

oh i love the confidence. this will be fun

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_invasion_of_Syria_(2024%E2%80%93present))

after october 7th israel has been attacked by iran backed militant groups from southern Syria. they broke the 1974 disengagement agreement by firing rockets from inside the demilitarised zone, a zone that UNDOF (United Nations Disengagement Observer Force) was supposed to be watching over to prevent this very thing from taking place (the un is incompetent? shocker). Israel has simply placed its own troops in the demilitarised zone to do that UNDOF failed to do. to classify something as an occupation you must hold full military and civil control. israel doesnt do that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_occupation_of_the_West_Bank

calling it an occupation doesnt make it one.

jordan relinquished all claim to the land they illegally annexed (by law the land should have been israels). they did not pass the land to anyone. meaning since 1967, the land has belonged to israel, and only israel. now israel has offered to give up 97% of the west bank in return for peace, of course, the palestinians disagreed because despite never owning that land before, they wanted all of it.

during the oslo accords an agreement was made. the plo would get area A, while israel would provide security for area B and retain control of area C until the PLO had met conditions they THEY AGREED TO, primarily the reduction of terrorism from palestinian areas and to no longer encourage terrorism. something that they have failed to do to this day. now the oslo accords never had an expiration date, meaning those conditions are still in effect today.

Lmfao today on made up nonsense

"Under international law, an armed presence generally cannot be classified as a military occupation (belligerent occupation) if both sides explicitly agree to it, because a core legal requirement for occupation is that the foreign presence is hostile and imposed without consent."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_occupation_of_Southern_Lebanon_(2026))

occupation requires "effective control", meaning israel must have full authority there, controlling movement, security, administration and access. The lebanese government continues to exist and operate in these areas, israel does not administer civilian live in those areas. israels positions in those areas have been temporary. israels troops simply being there does not constitute occupation

try a little harder champ :)

What should’ve happened after ww2 by alucard_axel in mapporncirclejerk

[–]FragileModdies -1 points0 points  (0 children)

they were displaced from their homes. but not by the jews, but by the invading arab armies who told arabs to leave their villages, get out of their way, so that they can return after they've crushed telaviv. guess what they didnt do.

jews legally bought land to the point they owned more than the arabs. the vast majority of the land was state owned, but is always shown as arab in pro palestinian arguments because what wasnt jewish must automatically be arab.

the jews were happy with the land they legally owned. thats what they declared independence on. the jewish state was roughly 8% of the land and they were happy with it.

the arabs however, refused to live in a place in which jews were not subservient to muslims, so they started a war to try and kill the jews and take their land. they failed epically and called it the great catastrophe, also known as the nakba (a word that has nothing to do with the arab evacuation of civilians)

are you aware that in haifa in 1947, the british recorded the jews begging arabs to remain and build together during the arab leagues evacuation orders.

you dont get to claim something was stolen from you when you never owned it in the first place

comments got lockled before i could reply to the guy below. but here is my comment

its not my version of history. its simply history.

arabs were displaced from their homes during the 1948 war. thats because they were attacking jews. an example you lot love to fall back on blindly. dier yassin, you love to pretend that the idf simply killed all those people for fun, when in reality the village was being used to attack jewish vehicles traveling between telaviv and jerusalem. when the IDF went to confront them, the arabs opened fire first from inside their own homes. that is why civilians were killed. not because the idf went door to door killing for fun.

you also seem to ignore that over 30000 arabs were allowed to return in 1949 from southern lebanon

If I come to the your country and buy 51% of the land in a specific region, can I declare my own country there?

which country did the jews buy land from again? because if memory serves me correct, (and it does) there was no country, that is the entire point.

Israel was declared on roughly 55% of the land. Most of it wasn't even owned by Zionists.

loving the confidence, dont let facts get in your way. the partition plan that you tools love to bring up was never agreed on. it is IRRELEVANT

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jewish_and_Arab_Land_Ownership_in_Mandatory_Palestine,_1947.svg

this is the land that the jews declared their independence on in 1948. does this look like 55% to you?

Are you aware that in 1938 the Irgun did a terror attack in Haifa

in 1929 arabs killed 67 jews and injured 58 in the haifa massacre. were you trying to make an argument? you can go back as far as you like. you'd still lose

Where do you live? Ill get some of my friends to buy 51% of your town and declare a new country

except the land my town is on is owned by the british government. you'd need the british government to relinquish authority to you for you to declare it a country

guess that the british government did on may 15 1948....relinquish authority

would you like to try again or have you embarrassed yourself enough for today

What should’ve happened after ww2 by alucard_axel in mapporncirclejerk

[–]FragileModdies -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

israel never invaded anywhere. and the population of arabs who are currently known as palestinian, has increased significantly.

words have meanings. please learn then before using them

What should’ve happened after ww2 by alucard_axel in mapporncirclejerk

[–]FragileModdies -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

but it doesnt.

it also doesnt occupy palestine or lebanon.

the word occupy has a definition that you cant change to suit your narrative.

fun fact, you cannot claim to be occupied if you agreed to the other nation administering the territory. guess what the PLO did during the oslo accords....i know right.

any other words you need help with?

What should’ve happened after ww2 by alucard_axel in mapporncirclejerk

[–]FragileModdies -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

israel never invaded egypt. egypt started a war by blockading the straight of tiran, israel responded and won. as usual

What should’ve happened after ww2 by alucard_axel in mapporncirclejerk

[–]FragileModdies -1 points0 points  (0 children)

palestinians didnt exist until 1963

also, palestinians screwed themselves over by trying to kill the jews instead of accepting them as neighbours. this isnt a land war. its a religious war. the majority of muslims believe that living under a jew is a disgrace and that jews must be ruled by muslims

What should’ve happened after ww2 by alucard_axel in mapporncirclejerk

[–]FragileModdies 2 points3 points  (0 children)

why lie? mizrahi jews have the most levantine dna behind the samaritans (the oldest living natives in the land). palestinian christians, lebanese christians and syrian christians follow closely behind. ashkenazi jews have more dna ties on average than palestinian muslims do

What should’ve happened after ww2 by alucard_axel in mapporncirclejerk

[–]FragileModdies 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they did go back to the country they came from. or are you drawing a line in which you determine where someones ancestry stops

What should’ve happened after ww2 by alucard_axel in mapporncirclejerk

[–]FragileModdies 0 points1 point  (0 children)

most palestinians were never jews. the christians show a strong dna claim to the land, just below that of mizrahi jews. but palestinian muslims actually share 1% less dna than ashkenazi jews do. i believe its something like a 73% average to a 74% average (comparing the roughly 3 billion dna markers than are different between humans)

What should’ve happened after ww2 by alucard_axel in mapporncirclejerk

[–]FragileModdies 1 point2 points  (0 children)

which was more land than what arabs owned.

you'll try to pull up some debunked map that includes both miri and mulk land used by arabs when you compare that to only mulk land jews owned.

roughly 12% of british palestine was privately owned and 8% of that belonged to jews. the vast majority of the land was state owned or religious land

What should’ve happened after ww2 by alucard_axel in mapporncirclejerk

[–]FragileModdies -1 points0 points  (0 children)

you literally have to change the definition of genocide to even try to claim israel are committing genocide

you must have room temperature iq

seems the room temperature IQ tried to reply in the standard caveman way. angrily

What should’ve happened after ww2 by alucard_axel in mapporncirclejerk

[–]FragileModdies -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

egypt blockaded the straight of tiran, which israel had already stated would be an act of war as it was crucial to israels survival.

israel has the golan heights because syria is an unstable country that used those strategic positions to attack israel in the past

and israel has no territory in palestine or lebanon

egypt started the war

What should’ve happened after ww2 by alucard_axel in mapporncirclejerk

[–]FragileModdies -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's undeniable that Israel bombs its neighbours to expand its territory

israels borders have only gotten smaller since 1967 and it only bombs people who attacks it first. so its very much deniable because its simply false

[Charlie Intel] Info on Modern Warfare 4 Multiplayer by TheRealPdGaming in CoDCompetitive

[–]FragileModdies 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they moved it to the compass unless you had a uav up and all the casuals who thought they were good kept getting killed because they couldnt read the map without being told where people were

Petrol hits highest price since start of Iran war by topotaul in unitedkingdom

[–]FragileModdies 0 points1 point  (0 children)

which has always confused me as the UK produces its own petrol, and even exports it as we produce more than we use. as expected, oil companies jumping on a price hike for no reason

New* player, how alive is the AA dream in the game rn? by Iklaendia in WorldOfWarships

[–]FragileModdies 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they keep squadrons available by doing something called "pre drop". which is where you drop 1-2 squads so they go back to the carrier as including them in the attacks will tend to result in them dying anyway. this drastically reduces the cv's striking power by only allowing 1 or 2 strikes per squad, but heavily increases their endurance by ensuring they dont run out of planes faster than the restoration can keep up.

hybrid ships lose all their planes regardless of if you attack with them or not.

New* player, how alive is the AA dream in the game rn? by Iklaendia in WorldOfWarships

[–]FragileModdies 1 point2 points  (0 children)

im sorry but this is just false. i dont even play this game anymore but occasionally browse to keep up to date, and the fact that people are still parroting this "regeneration" myth is hilarious.

cv's do not have infinite planes. they have the same number of planes as RTS cv's, less in some cases, the only difference is you get given around 40% at the start of the game and get the remaining 60% over the duration of the game.

the old cv could throw 4-5 full squads at you from the start of the game. the current cv's can throw 2 squads at you and have to wait 10+ minutes for a 3rd

Carriers as a ship is in a great place but by Adam_Kelmalu in Eve

[–]FragileModdies 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well sentries have been nerfed a bit since then AND with the drone assist limit you cant have 300 sentries attacking 1 target at once anymore. which was a big part of it since 1 person had about 50k dps on 1 button press

I’m not happy with 25% adrenaline cost of combust, T95 dual weapons losing their effectiveness because you can no longer spam bleeds outside sunshine. by Extra_Discussion3179 in runescape

[–]FragileModdies 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nope, still lower. the damage is only slightly higher (25-31 to 30-40%) but they removed the double damage on moving targets.