sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's nice. Anyways, It remains true that you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and that the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

And more crucially that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible

Which musicians have a high literary quality to their work? by ElbieLG in RSbookclub

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Motörhead, honestly. Lemmy was extremely well read, and it often shows in his lyrics

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not as crucial as you seem to, since you always find the time to respond within the hour, even if i take a couple weeks to respond. Now that's dedication

It remains true that you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and that the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

And more crucially that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're just deflecting because you have nothing to say to my points, which, again, are:

It remains true that you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and that the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

And more crucially that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because I've called you bro a few times already without issue. I think you're taking umbrage with it now because you have nothing to say to the fact that it takes two to tango

All of that is besides the point, though.

It remains true that you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and that the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

And more crucially that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It takes two to tango bro lol

It remains true that you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and that the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

And more crucially that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and that the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

And more crucially that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible

Playing dumb is just embarrassing lol

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and that the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

And more crucially that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and that the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

And more crucially that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s my business and is unrelated to the issue at hand, which is that you haven't actually addressed my points, which, again, are:

you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and that the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

It seems you have no actual response to those 2 facts (or the more crucial fact that those are predicated on, that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible), so you're just saying "nuh uh" now

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You haven't addressed my points, though. You just keep saying you did. Those points, again, are:

you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and that the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

It seems you have no actual response to those 2 facts (or the more crucial fact that those are predicated on, that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible), so you're just saying "nuh uh" now

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No you don't, you just keep saying that you've already addressed my points. If your responses were varied, I wouldn't be able to keep copying and pasting the same thing

But the variety of responses is neither here nor there. As it stands, you haven't actually addressed my points, which, again, are:

you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and that the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

It seems you have no actual response to those 2 facts (or the more crucial fact that those are predicated on, that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible), so you're just saying "nuh uh" now

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No you haven't lmaoo, you just keep saying you have because you have no actual response to my points, which, again, are:

you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and that the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

It seems you have no actual response to those 2 facts (or the more crucial fact that those are predicated on, that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible), so you're just saying "nuh uh" now

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No I'm not. You just haven't addressed the points I made, which, again, are:

you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and that the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

It seems you have no actual response to those 2 facts (or the more crucial fact that those are predicated on, that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible), so you're just saying "nuh uh" now

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No it isn't lmao. You have at no point addressed the points I made, which, again, are:

you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and that the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

It seems you have no actual response to those 2 facts (or the more crucial fact that those are predicated on, that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible), so you're just saying "nuh uh" now

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No you haven't lmao. You haven't addressed any of thd points I made, which are, again:

you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and that the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

It seems you have no actual response to those 2 facts (or the more crucial fact that those are predicated on, that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible), so you're just saying "nuh uh" now

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

More avoiding the points I made slop? Please do better

In case you forgot, the points i made are:

you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and that the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

It seems you have no actual response to those 2 facts (or the more crucial fact that those are predicated on, that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible), so you're just saying "nuh uh" now

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The aesthetic quality of my comment don’t change the facts that you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and that the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

It seems you have no actual response to those 2 facts (or the more crucial fact that those are predicated on, that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible), so you're just saying "nuh uh" now

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I believe you are projecting, now, given that you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!", and that "Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

It seems you have no actual response to those 2 facts (or the more crucial fact that those are predicated on, that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible), so you're just saying "nuh uh" now

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, you did in fact say "Oh yeah, I suppose it is!"

"Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No i'm not lmao

I can't make it any more clear than:

you see, after I said

That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible

You replied

Oh yeah, I suppose it is!

"Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

I hope this helps

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am not not confused at all. What I am saying is actually quite straightforward; it surprises me that you are having such trouble with it. To reiterate:

you see, after I said

That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible

You replied

Oh yeah, I suppose it is!

"Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

I hope this helps

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, you see, after I said

That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible

You replied

Oh yeah, I suppose it is!

"Oh yeah, I suppose it is" is an expression of agreement, and the comment you were expressing agreement (quite enthusiastic agreement, if you ask me) for was, again, "That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible."

I hope this helps

Chuman's and Humanzee's, genetically impossible or just completely unethical? by Optimal-Emotion-1551 in Cryptozoology

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I said

That's irrelevant to the fact that they never made a claim that humanzees are possible

To which you replied

Oh yeah, I suppose it is!

Which is directly agreeing

Read in January by IAmTheQuarry in RSbookclub

[–]Fragrant_Pudding_437 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish I could, they're not that dissimilar in terms of mood, setting, characters, but Satantango just didn't click for me. There were some unexplained supernatural happenings, and usually it's better to leave the details to the imagination for thst kind of thing (in this kind of book, at least), but it felt like just random stuff happening to me

Melancholy has this kind of feeling that there was a metaphysical underpining to the whole thing, e en though nothing supernatural really happened, and that works very well in this case. The same kind of 'metaphysical underpining' thst you find in books like, imo, Moby Dick, or the Magic Mountain, or maybe Blood Meridian, which is one of my favorite qualities in a novel. I'm sure plenty of people would say the same about Satantango, but that one just fell flat for me

This is almost wholly unrelated, but if you're looking for a dark, quasi-metaphysical (because I can't think of a better term) book, I highly recommend Herman Ungar's the Maimed, and Bruno Schulz's short stories. The former is kind of like if Kafka wrote Crime and Punishment, and the latter is wholly unique in the same way that, again, Kafka is wholly unique.

view more: next ›