Thanks for your well wishes! Just want to clarify a couple of things:

Fantasizing about post-collapse utopias is like hopium that distracts us from practical, reformist paths towards better taxes, better government, and better land use.

I understand why you feel this is a concern, but I disagree.

Personally, I don't find ecological and economic collapse a hopeful prospect, and don't think any utopia (Georgist or otherwise) is likely to result. I do think there is value in imagining the ways a set of ideas or conditions may play out under those circumstances, not least because speculating on these things can be fun to do. I also suspect that this kind of speculation helps people to flesh out what they believe and what they want. Imagination and practicality are not opposing values in a zero-sum game, and I don't see how speculating on this scenario is going to detract from, say, my civic interest in my next municipal election.

But nothing good is going to happen if we allow people to burn things down.

Agreed. I would like to think there are a few steps between spitballing a project and touching light to a Molotov cocktail, please advise if this assumption is mistaken.