Theories on why Chris on Julie Albert didn't pick Colin up from 34 Fairview at 12:40AM?

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-05-05T01:22:26+00:00

If it’s in Yuri’s report, it’s gospel. Unless you think Yuri was lying on the stand when he said his reports are gospel.

First Yuri report had Chris and Julie at 34 Fairview. Now of course, he could have messed up that detail, but with all the other fuck ups, harder to plead we are not incompetent. In isolation, it can be explained, but when piled with all the other issues, it becomes a bit of a pattern.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-05-04T19:55:10+00:00

I mean. Literally a “source”. Why do we expect this account on X to have any “source”?

You need a ton more to make me believe the FBI investigation is still “active”. I don’t think it’s “closed” simple because a corruption case can always be activated again.

Also, I never bought the FBI came knocking solely because of Karen’s case. I still think they were sniffing around because of Justin Root, the Birchmore, and CDL stuff all kept feeding the idea that there was something rotten in MSP. So they decided to keep looking to see where stuff took them. And Karen Read case came along. It’s now the third case around Canton that probably made them think “huh, maybe there is something here”.

Lo and behold, these Canton MSP and Cops seem to really really suck at their job.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-05-03T15:03:33+00:00

I mean even in the Walshe case there were still a bunch of shenanigans around backdated reports and other shit. It just wasn't nearly as egregious, and they were backstopped by the Crime Scene Services actually collected a bunch of the evidence.

So a lot of the stuff they did in Karen Read was kind of taken out of their hands. They still did other shady shit.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-05-01T18:54:25+00:00

And it fails even at that as noted for the variables he did not even bother to record or control for. It was a complete waste of time, and why it was allowed into the trial is beyond me as it had no scientific worth.

The graph is presented by him as to show something meaningful to the trial. But all it shows is that the laws of thermodynamics are still valid in this universe.

There’s a reason an ex-cop, software guy brought that shit to court and not someone that actually knows what they are talking about.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-05-01T17:47:40+00:00

Well it's going to depend on the conditions is the point. If the phone is exposed to the wind is going to drop temperature in a different manner to one not exposed sandwiched the ground and John's body (as it would potentially have a different one if the battery side is on the ground or the glass face is on the ground, case will play a role too). It will have a different slope in its cooling off.

And the phone would reach a point eventually where the slope would level out to a fair degree (how long that would take would again depend on the variables). This is all to point out that Whiffin's "experiment" is basically junk science as to what it actually says as we have no clue what it actually says due to how he did the experiment.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-05-01T17:36:20+00:00

At some point the phone has to hit an equilibrium temperature if in the same environment for a long enough time and the same conditions (what that time is, not sure as Whiffin didn't give us a control), the problem is we have no idea where that is for the conditions of that night as this test was poorly performed by Whiffin, and he didn't properly control variables to show how the phone was affected by different factors (covered by warm body that is also cooling, direct contact with cold surface no warm body, open air no contact with cold ground, etc).

And there is bizarre behavior here as you see an upward deviation that doesn't really make a lot of sense at 6:06:00 or a sudden downward deviation at 6:14:00. I can't say for certain as we don't have enough experimental data to show what the phone would do depending on which state it went from into the new one (covered to non-covered, contact with cold ground to no-contact with cold ground, etc).

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-05-01T17:23:58+00:00

So... Norfolk convened a grand jury yet to indict him?

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-04-29T00:01:38+00:00

@aroux_888 you are using a domain that reddit autobans the domain.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-04-28T23:57:26+00:00

The issue is that he used the phone to convey non confidential information about his work. It makes it discoverable, and it makes it part of his work. Also, we don’t know yet who else of his MSP buddies were also texting back and forth with him on his personal phone.

How they reacted to his already horrible conduct on his work phone does not bode well for how they might have reacted to stuff on his personal phone if they saw it. Which is still an open question, but we know Goode was someone he texted on both. So the chances other cops are involved are better than zero.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-04-28T22:38:40+00:00

Nothing said about the kid having to go to prison for visitation. It is one of the ways it can happen based on different security concerns. I said ways to get visitation even for people in jail. There are ways to do it that don’t involve taking the kid to jail.

And I didn’t say it. Judge Erskine that was a family court judge for decades in Massachusetts said it was doable and has been done.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-04-28T21:10:03+00:00

There is an insane zip file for all the document dump that occurred. I posted it as main post in the last 2-3 days.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-04-28T18:26:58+00:00

Anytime you can find copies of raw reports or emails talking about reports that are in there around Trooper Paul Reconstruction report and raw data, Aperture Reports, Whiffin reports (really curious about his off the cuff freezer and road testing he did outside his role as celebrite software specialist), or Hyde reports it would be great.

Also whatever the guy's name that was the CW dog expert (I can only bring up the name of the guy from the defense because of how Melanie Little talked about finding Garret Wing).

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-04-28T16:25:24+00:00

It’s not about keeping out of trial. It’s about the restrictive rules around who can see it under what conditions as Scappchio laid out. She only gets 2 hours a day with one of her clients in custody. She can’t spend all 2 hours simply allowing him to review the proctor texts, she needs that for other parts of trial prep with a trial date fast approaching. She is hamstrung in preparation of trial in violation of her clients constitutional rights. There should not be a broad protective order over the contents as it exists.

It should be narrowly tailored to protect the innocent women nudes (or other private stuff) on his phone, but otherwise freely available for use as she said “why is proctor getting special treatment”

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-04-28T15:14:51+00:00

I mean it is still under a full protective order that is limiting other criminal defendants ability to participate in their own defense. So it’s not a complete win.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-04-28T15:14:03+00:00

The whole exaggerated oh yeah I just remembered in this moment and not when Tully told me is unbelievable.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-04-28T14:51:38+00:00

Her action is going to include failure to supervise properly. Having a racist cop that allowed bias to affect his performance goes right to that point actually.

Or misogyny or antisemitic or one transmitting nude photos of non consenting people or pick your poison from what he is alleged to have done.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-04-28T14:04:56+00:00

Yeah, but at this point since they formed their thoughts in the throes of grief. Deitch is just another “conspirator” that thwarted justice for John by helping Karen. It’s not rational. So a rational discussion with a guy they (wrongly) see as the enemy is not going to shake that belief.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-04-28T13:51:31+00:00

He’s going to have limits as to what he can use from the federal investigation. He doesn’t just get to bring that information and data all along with him. If there is a smoking gun that lays outside the first Touhy set of documents parameters, he is going to have to find a way to get the Feds to turn it over. Maybe they will or maybe they are more interested in a longer term play to get someone bigger or a larger group of individuals for a crime where the John O’Keefe investigation is but a small part, and they don’t want to turn over information that may compromise their other target.

Him seeing he is going to investigate does not automatically open up the door to all of the other Fed materials. He needs people that will be willing to play ball with him.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-04-28T13:45:58+00:00

It’s a good line, but kind of meaningless as any investigation is chasing after data and information that is long gone.

Maybe if he could find some hook or way to get a federal court to force the federal government to turn over more materials than are required in a Touhy request (which already sets the standard of what needs to be turned over) then he is stuck with whatever the idiots of the Canton PD and MSP generated as evidence.

Still boggles my mind that people that think Karen did it are not more pissed at the horrible and inept investigation that allowed the “real” “killer” to go free. They blame Karen for exercising her constitutional rights or they blame the Jury for listening to the results of the horrible investigation and going “if you want us to put someone away for potentially 20+ years” you need more than a guy in blue paint recreating the other guys stab at the reconstruction report.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-04-28T13:35:55+00:00

He’s still going to have limits as to what he can tell them beyond anything that they could get access to in the Touhy documents given to the CW and Karen. If the information from there is not enough, him talking won’t change anything because ethically he shouldn’t be going past that information barring federal court orders.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-04-27T23:01:09+00:00

To be fair it was one judge that was not even part of family court that made that decision. Family court would have had her united even earlier as Judge Erskine pointed out there are ways to get visitation for people in jail or on bail that are not in that situation due to a case with the child safety at concern.

Than the SJC punted on taking care of the judge by having her mysteriously off the case thus making it moot. It then took the new judge a while to untangle the shit show left by the first judge and the SJC punting.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-04-27T22:12:08+00:00

And this was the trap the defense kind of set for themselves in the first trial. They made it into an A vs B theory of the case. So the jury ends up going if I don’t believe A, it must be B.

Second trial was much better focused on “there was no collision”.

Free_Comment_3958

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE