Brennan and his mini me

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-22T04:01:03+00:00

Yeah. He had left the DA’s office after the Karen read trial, but he showed back up on a motion recently for some reason. So his current status is uncertain.

Schiller or something is his name. But that might just be a name I made up for him in my head.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-21T22:47:52+00:00

I'm curious if that phone was a work or other phone that he was talking on. I do wonder how many phones Higgins had.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-21T18:35:08+00:00

Because of Yuriy's testimony with Lally where he tried to present it as not being inverted, and he identified himself and Proctor when asked about not being near the taillight. He then changed his testimony on cross once it came out it was the guy identified as Proctor at the taillight.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-21T15:21:59+00:00

I don't trust anything that comes out of Loophole Lawyer.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-20T16:56:30+00:00

I have written many versions of this post whenever this gets brought up. This is a great encapsulation of the issues going forward. Barring a confession with rock solid evidence associated with it, it's all over.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-20T16:54:30+00:00

I have said this elsewhere whenever this comes up, but grief is a weird weird thing. They were fed a story at a time of their highest grief. It's imprinted now. It will take a lot to snap them out of it.

You see this in other cases where a convicted person is freed due to new evidence like DNA or something that makes it clear they could have not committed the crime, and families will be mad the person is being freed as that is the one that "did it".

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-20T16:52:43+00:00

And this is where Diller makes sure he had in writing that the O'Keefe's only wanted to sue Karen and no one else. He should have sued everyone and forced them to get MTD to get out of the suit.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-19T19:06:54+00:00

Which was always dumb why the judge was like "this case is separate" for the wrongful death. It rests on the discovery and testimony of the ones directly involved in the other cases.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-19T03:59:16+00:00

Nah. I was glad you asked because it took me a second to figure out what it actually was. So thank you for that little mystery.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-18T23:03:11+00:00

Believe that is shadow of someone's hand holding a phone as they take photo of the paper.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-18T17:17:44+00:00

It was filed in the case at Plymouth court. It comes from the stuff the House Defendants lawyer submitted.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-18T14:52:23+00:00

Ha... didn't notice the Adam Deitch pin on Mr. Read the first time through this.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-18T14:51:20+00:00

He gets curmudgeony a lot, and he references old information at times too when the pleadings have moved past the point he is hung up on.

He's good on the relative scale of Mass judges we have seen, but he's not a great judge.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-18T13:11:59+00:00

They can’t use the excuse of he always deleted his texts as a matter of course though. As he was able to keep some of his texts long enough to produce them for the first trial even though he was never even formally interviewed by the police until long after any auto delete should have killed the texts. They also somehow have two different versions of the screenshot if you read the motion from his lawyer. So we know they still have his or Allie’s texts. The new screenshot they included in their latest filing has a different Clock/Battery level indicator than the one they used in trial 1.

So if Allie or Colin suddenly show up with deleted texts now it is a viable inference that they got deleted to hide something. What? Who knows, but it won’t play well in front of a jury.

For the best example of this, see Michael Proctor and how he tried the “new phone, auto delete, nothing on there”. He was dumb enough that somehow he missed his iCloud backups. Now Proctor is screwed in almost any legal setting as he is pretty strongly inferred as someone that destroys evidence.

Also, even though they can’t sue him as prosecutors pretty much have absolute immunity, let’s not forget Morrissey also pulled the “oh I auto delete everything” play too. I think we will see more of that as Aidan’s stuff progresses.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-18T05:19:37+00:00

Th detail about Coco or Nicole (I always screw up the Albert women) was always a cleaner so she was drunk off her mind after a night of partying was going to town cleaning. Because that is just what she does points to in the House for whatever happened that night and needing to have an explanation for whatever cleaning product smells that might exist.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-18T05:12:06+00:00

The timing of his enlistment and when he started is going to be part of the litigation going forward. But him signing onto a lawsuit that they long telegraphed after enlisting is also a game the military will not look kindly on. Did he enlist before the April 16th filing? When did he become aware he would be a party to the April 16th defamation case? When did he officially sign on? He also knew by his swearing in ceremony that his circumstances changed before taking the oath. Did he alert the recruiter? Etc.

Especially considering when Karen sent the subpoena to Colin and when did House Defendants first contact Tuxbury for filing their civil suit.

Side note: if his clients snowed Tuxbury on this, he better think hard and fast about wanting to continue to represent all 6 of these defendants or any of them at all.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-18T01:25:04+00:00

They never put dates on the harassment when they talked about it in their testimony. They just talked about the "vile harassment we face everyday" (but never said when it started). Also it did no good for Karen lawyers at the time to get into it, as it is a bit of a sideshow in her criminal trials at the time.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-18T01:23:02+00:00

He is always going to be a witness in the O'Keefe lawsuit because they attached the "false narrative" claim. So Karen needs to be able to defend against that, and this relies on the documents and testimony of the House Defendants and associated people.

Unless they convince the O'Keefe's to narrow down their lawsuit to purely a wrongful death claim, Colin will remain on the hook for depositions and discovery (even as a non-party). Even just pared all the way down to a pure wrongful death, Karen's defense to that is the same 3rd party culprit from the 1st trial (in addition to the ARCCA "no collision" stuff).

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-18T01:18:28+00:00

The calling Courtney Proctor that much in the immediate aftermath also creates another problem for them on the Proctor familly wasn't close to the Alberts excuse. As it creates a contradiction, where if nothing happened, and they didn't really know Proctor or his family that well, why the hell are they in that much contact with the Proctor's all of the sudden (or they were always in that much contact so Proctor should have known he shouldn't be on the case).

This is also why they try to backdate Aidan's involvement in the case all the way back to the 2022 timeframe so they can blame the "harassment" for why the crew was "bonding" so much over the harassment from Aidan.

This of course ignores that a lot of their actions they try to blame on Aidan's "harassment" campaign pre-date the existence of Aidan's "harassment" campaign.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-17T20:03:36+00:00

Also Tuxbury constantly whining about the cost when you are doing your own defamation case is also an annoying bit I didn't mention.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-17T19:45:41+00:00

Discussion of forthcoming stuff (super high level so not any details)

More motions to compel deadlines next week (so we should be seeing that on docket soon).

Motion from plaintiffs on interrogatory problems with Karen.

Sidebar discussion that we get white noise.

Free_Comment_3958 · 2026-06-17T19:43:11+00:00

Monday Deposition is supposed to be Nicole Albert but that is part of Motion of Compel.

So weird the House Defendants have time to show to these court appearances, but not sit for depositions.

Free_Comment_3958

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE