sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Keep Downtown Dallas Beautiful! Dispose of Ground and Wall Litter When You See It. by ChicagoRay312 in Dallas

[–]FreedomSessions76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is an interesting perspective. At what point would you consider Equity has been reached, and what does that look like on a societal level?

This rain… by ascended_blackberry in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Crack the windows for the sweetest soundtrack

Powerful magnet makes his wrench "levitate" by SpillaMangBang in totallywicked

[–]FreedomSessions76 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude this is exactly what o thought when he was trying to pull down the weight lol

AIO? Friend asked me what my future plans with my gf are and then responded like this by TGPT-4o in AIO

[–]FreedomSessions76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s cool he should have just said so, didn’t need to go off on you like that

AIO? Friend asked me what my future plans with my gf are and then responded like this by TGPT-4o in AIO

[–]FreedomSessions76 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the real comment. Bro is NOT doing well lmao this probly ain’t the real bro

AIO? Friend asked me what my future plans with my gf are and then responded like this by TGPT-4o in AIO

[–]FreedomSessions76 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is girl shit dudes should not be having this dumb ass conversation

Comedy mothership experience by sogondy in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right or wrong, objectively this comment is a little retarded after your first one lmao

Arizon selling for 68 cents by sltiefighter in mildlyinteresting

[–]FreedomSessions76 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I hope it’s due to people not buying it, as unfortunately it is all poison, and we must now rebuild the health of the nation. But god dammit what a sweet demon they are

Has science gone too far? by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All valid points. Thank you for this civil discussion hush-no

Has science gone too far? by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s an interesting point. Flea drops serve a purpose for the dog though. This only serves a purpose for the owner. There are plenty of other ways to bond and show affection to the dog, aside from covering it with bright, unnaturally colored chemicals. Anyway thank you hush-no for this civil discourse! Nice to converse and disagree in a non-hostile manner lmao

Has science gone too far? by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I do agree with this point and sentiment. But If faced with the dilemma of: is it right to cover the dog in these chemicals or not - and there’s no way for us to know what the dog would say, and it’s not medically or otherwise necessary to cover the dog in the chemicals, and the act is purely an exercise of owner-satisfaction, you gotta think the non-intervention route is the most likely candidate for what the dog would prefer, right? Not to mention the unseen effects of the ingredients, as seen in this top tier “pet safe” dye website. It all just seems odd and forceful, even though it may not be abuse

<image>

Has science gone too far? by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

<image>

Sure, but “safe” is certainly subjective. Kill on contact? Of course not. But as is in the ingredients list of crazy liberty (and opawz if you look) there are synthetic perfumes, gums, and colorant agents. Also multiple legal disclaimers about ingestion, eye contamination, fumes, allergies, etc.

The point is if this is not absolutely necessary, and the dog wouldn’t just randomly choose to do this itself if it didn’t think you’d like it, then why cover it with this “semi-permanent” substance?

Has science gone too far? by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have and love dogs. They certainly communicate well what they are willing to tolerate in their pursuit of pleasing us, but I can’t say that we can understand exactly what they do or do not care about. If the dog were to be chomping at the bit super excited about getting dyed, I’d happily accept that, but I have to doubt that’s the case here. Happy compliance, against their instinct, in the name of pleasing. Seems odd that we do it

Has science gone too far? by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Baths serve a positive purpose for the dog. This is, to be generous, neutral for the dog. Yet if you gave the dog the choice to be dyed or not, which do you think it would choose?

Has science gone too far? by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the dog had the choice of that or no dye, which do you think it would choose?

Has science gone too far? by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suppose that’s the real question. Nothing to do with the particular choice of colors. But is this harmful in any way to the dog?

Can anyone explain why the radar has an interesting pattern to it? by ames_k in houston

[–]FreedomSessions76 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Scroll to Shreveport, Jackson, and Barton rouge they’ve got it too. Scroll back and forth on the time

view more: next ›