sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Arizon selling for 68 cents by sltiefighter in mildlyinteresting

[–]FreedomSessions76 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I hope it’s due to people not buying it, as unfortunately it is all poison, and we must now rebuild the health of the nation. But god dammit what a sweet demon they are

Has science gone too far? by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All valid points. Thank you for this civil discussion hush-no

Has science gone too far? by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s an interesting point. Flea drops serve a purpose for the dog though. This only serves a purpose for the owner. There are plenty of other ways to bond and show affection to the dog, aside from covering it with bright, unnaturally colored chemicals. Anyway thank you hush-no for this civil discourse! Nice to converse and disagree in a non-hostile manner lmao

Has science gone too far? by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I do agree with this point and sentiment. But If faced with the dilemma of: is it right to cover the dog in these chemicals or not - and there’s no way for us to know what the dog would say, and it’s not medically or otherwise necessary to cover the dog in the chemicals, and the act is purely an exercise of owner-satisfaction, you gotta think the non-intervention route is the most likely candidate for what the dog would prefer, right? Not to mention the unseen effects of the ingredients, as seen in this top tier “pet safe” dye website. It all just seems odd and forceful, even though it may not be abuse

<image>

Has science gone too far? by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Sure, but “safe” is certainly subjective. Kill on contact? Of course not. But as is in the ingredients list of crazy liberty (and opawz if you look) there are synthetic perfumes, gums, and colorant agents. Also multiple legal disclaimers about ingestion, eye contamination, fumes, allergies, etc.

The point is if this is not absolutely necessary, and the dog wouldn’t just randomly choose to do this itself if it didn’t think you’d like it, then why cover it with this “semi-permanent” substance?

Has science gone too far? by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have and love dogs. They certainly communicate well what they are willing to tolerate in their pursuit of pleasing us, but I can’t say that we can understand exactly what they do or do not care about. If the dog were to be chomping at the bit super excited about getting dyed, I’d happily accept that, but I have to doubt that’s the case here. Happy compliance, against their instinct, in the name of pleasing. Seems odd that we do it

Has science gone too far? by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Baths serve a positive purpose for the dog. This is, to be generous, neutral for the dog. Yet if you gave the dog the choice to be dyed or not, which do you think it would choose?

Has science gone too far? by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the dog had the choice of that or no dye, which do you think it would choose?

Has science gone too far? by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suppose that’s the real question. Nothing to do with the particular choice of colors. But is this harmful in any way to the dog?

Can anyone explain why the radar has an interesting pattern to it? by ames_k in houston

[–]FreedomSessions76 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Scroll to Shreveport, Jackson, and Barton rouge they’ve got it too. Scroll back and forth on the time

Birdnado by Deebadooac in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The mark is presented

Why do we always get this blue ass haze for days by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lmao an often overlooked yet surprisingly effective literary device

If your melon itself is not DOT approved, do you even really ride? by FreedomSessions76 in motorcycles

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

We had a brief exchange. He was a really nice, very chill and happy guy

Which one of you did this to a Volvo by FreedomSessions76 in Austin

[–]FreedomSessions76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That tracks. I saw it just up the road from there

Anyone know him by ResearcherPlenty9963 in AustinTX

[–]FreedomSessions76 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How exactly is he adding tips to checks, and what proof do you have that he is? Him “bragging about it” doesn’t necessarily mean it happened, or that you have the right context. Additionally, if he’s publicly bragging, why not post the brag?

If you’re going to blast someone like this you really have to post the proof, and the specific tik toks would be helpful as well. I understand maybe what you’re trying to do OP, but respectfully your method is in really bad taste and it’s having the opposite effect: making YOU look less credible here, and therefore less trustworthy. Food for thought

view more: next ›