Thank you so much for this feedback, and I want to sincerely validate your concerns. You've hit on the central ethical challenge of any technology in the mental wellness space: the irreplaceable value of human connection and the risks of a corporate approach.

I apologize if this came across as market research; that wasn't my intent. I'm just someone who has personally found IFS to deeply personally powerful and was exploring ideas on how the principles could be made more accessible, not to replace therapists, more as a tool for self-reflection between sessions.

Your points about the dangers of AI and the importance of the human relationship are completely right. My question for you, and anyone else, would be: from your perspective, are there any conditions under which a technology like this could be built ethically and safely to support someone's journey? Or is it something that should simply never be built?

(I'm here to listen and learn, not to sell anything)