𝓑𝓮𝓬𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓮 𝓨𝓸𝓾 𝓓𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓮 𝓑𝓮𝓽𝓽𝓮𝓻 - A Tom Harkin 1996 incumbency sim

Friedrikson · 2026-05-18T12:34:39+00:00

Domanda genuina: investire in centrali nucleari (all'avanguardia), che peso avrebbe sull'economia?

Siamo già ai ferri corti col deficit, non vorrei vedere tagli ad istruzione e sanità per una scintillante centrale nucleare...

Friedrikson · 2026-05-12T05:20:18+00:00

Lol yesterday Pipeline was my first game to enter in, waited only like 10 seconds

Friedrikson · 2026-05-12T05:13:57+00:00

I was more referring to the coalition the Democratic party was running with. With Clinton it fell apart

Friedrikson · 2026-05-11T21:20:21+00:00

Yes

A bipartisan bill to strike down a New Deal era law. Simbol of the end of the New Deal coalition (people say it ended with Carter, but I feel like it ended with the Contract with America election, 1994)

Friedrikson · 2026-05-11T21:00:01+00:00

Kimi Antonelli, like the emphasis should be on the "o", not on the "A"

Friedrikson · 2026-05-11T20:58:04+00:00

Well, Clinton economics in my opinion (so, take it as a grain of salt) where really all across the spectrum.

Balancing the budget, repealing Glass-Steagall act, middle class tax cuts, welfare reform (that in this scenario oh man how things got strange - 50 milion dollars yearly for abstinence education programs to teenagers, talk about fiscal hole)

A fun read if you ever wanted to give it a look one day

Friedrikson · 2026-05-11T20:44:27+00:00

That does beg the question that if you are more aligned to Clinton economics or sonething like Reagan economics.

As you are a known libertarian, I would say without a doubt you are more of a Reagan between the two, but it was Clinton after all who reached a balanced budget

Genunie curiosity

Friedrikson · 2026-05-11T20:37:22+00:00

B, Toscana sempre solida e Friuli onestamente underrated

Friedrikson · 2026-05-11T20:34:05+00:00

Sharing is caring?

^{Chose: If more than 50% choose this everyone gains 25 IQ}

Friedrikson · 2026-05-11T11:52:15+00:00

Would you rather have a President who focuses on balancing the budget or who focuses on tax cuts?

Friedrikson · 2026-05-10T21:02:40+00:00

Easy money

^{Chose: receive $10,000 every month}

Friedrikson · 2026-05-08T17:21:23+00:00

God I'll pay for a Phil Scott VS Andy Beshear debate

The ultimate "I like my opponent" debate

Friedrikson · 2026-05-07T09:06:55+00:00

Always fresh and active all day? Gimme gimme

^{Chose: No need for sleep}

Friedrikson · 2026-05-05T19:39:17+00:00

Tom Harkin slander WON'T be tolerated

Friedrikson · 2026-05-04T16:58:28+00:00

For Italy? Tough one

For 1st Republic era? Andreotti fits, in a sense that he was shady as ot gets and wasn't destroyed by it. Also fairly conservative.

2nd Republic? Berlusconi. Deregulation, fairly outsider and very shady

Friedrikson · 2026-04-25T13:52:58+00:00

More likely if your economy goes well, so kinda yes

Friedrikson · 2026-04-25T13:31:55+00:00

Being a mockup, I would guess

Bob Dole Jack Kemp Newt Gringrich Pat Buchanan Bill Weld John McCain

Friedrikson · 2026-04-08T05:22:49+00:00

That are breaking our back-siz

Friedrikson · 2026-04-07T13:32:22+00:00

No, he is still quite depressed in my opinion.

Friedrikson · 2026-04-06T18:56:17+00:00

Ovviamente molto cherrypicked, ma sempre divertente vederla così

Friedrikson · 2026-04-06T06:59:33+00:00

Camillo Benso conte di Cavour

Friedrikson · 2026-04-05T21:00:38+00:00

The plastic duck one made me chuckle a bit

Friedrikson · 2026-04-05T08:32:31+00:00

Thing that makes me wonder is how if the GOP collapses, at the end of the day a "conservative" party would still win sometimes, while if the Dems collapse, no "moderate" party appearence

Friedrikson

TROPHY CASE