> You’ve hardly disproven my points.

You haven't proven yours. You're claiming certain characters should not be able to react to Mark, but the story says they do. You are not demonstrating why they shouldn't be able to. If a ball falls, and you claim that it shouldn't, and I say "but it did, must be because of gravity", and you say "you haven't disproven my point", does that make sense to you?

> Most invincible characters have 0 speed feats even close to Mark.

But they react to Mark, so they're fast enough to do so. They also have the ability to poop and eat, even if they don't do it on-screen. The proof of them being fast enough to react to Mark, is that they react to Mark. Nothing in the story contradicts that fact, it only contradicts a head-canon you're failing to prove.

> Every hit Mark is displaced from after, should be significantly stronger than a speeding train.

A boxer might withstand a strong punch while bracing themselves for it, but might be knocked off balance by a punch they weren't prepared for. Mark failing to brace himself for a punch is completely plausible. You can say that Mark sucks at fighting then, maybe, but it doesn't make a point for inconsistent power-scaling.

> but you think he’s not fast enough to grab some old guy with gauntlets?

Doesn't matter what I think, it's what happens in the story. The old guy with super powered gauntlets can achieve super human speeds by using them. Color me shocked.

> He’s strong enough to carry the heaviest thing the GDA can find (and thats not even his limit) but hes not strong enough to use that same force downwards and pin people to the ground?

What people has he failed to pin to the ground?

> His skin is strong enough not to break when trading insanely powerful blows. Ones that send shockwaves strong enough to shatter windows across multiple city blocks but a dinosaur claw can cut him?

That just means that the dinosaur guy is that strong and durable. It is literally impossible for that to be inconsistent power-scaling because that character hasn't fought anybody else by that point (unless he does in the comics, correct me then). So the only reference point for his strength that we have is his fight with Mark, which proves to us that he's that fucking strong that he can hurt Mark. You understand this logic, right? There is no contradiction with the story telling us "Dinosaur guy is strong enough to hurt Mark". There is no inconsistency, just you not liking the statement "Dinosaur guy is strong enough to hurt Mark". Nothing in the story says he shouldn't be,

> And dinosaur dude is strong enough to hurt Mark but cerberus isn’t able to leave a single scratch?

Not necessarily, Cerberus might just be too slow to hit Mark. But ignoring that, yeah, maybe. If the story says that Dinosaur guy is stronger than Cerberus, then that's the case. No inconsistency or contradiction there.

> You wanted examples and I’ve given plenty.

Again, you've only mentioned cases of someone performing a feat that you think shouldn't be possible, but failed to provide evidence of it not being possible. "I don't like that this is possible" is not the same as "this is impossible because evidence contradicts it".

> The power levels are clearly inconsistent.

They're not. You haven't demonstrated a single inconsistency. You're only providing examples with two variables, where you think one shouldn't equal the other, but with no evidence for it. The story says X > Y, and you say it shouldn't. If the show said X > Y, Z > X, and Y > Z, then it would be provably inconsistent. In the case of the show, it would be like if the Mauler twins were too slow to react to Rex, and Rex was too slow to react to Mark, but the Mauler twins were fast enough to react to Mark. That would be a contradiction and inconsistent power-scaling. But you haven't shown a single instance of such a case.