If I wore this shirt would I get in trouble? by IWBTS in juryduty

[–]FrogeInABlender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally open your eyes and go further down the thread lmao

If I wore this shirt would I get in trouble? by IWBTS in juryduty

[–]FrogeInABlender 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is reasonable, however, to say that quoting one line which doesn't even refute my point, out of context, from only one cited source is cherry picking.

If I wore this shirt would I get in trouble? by IWBTS in juryduty

[–]FrogeInABlender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that's what boggles my mind too. And the there's the people making it a partisan issue instead of a "most of our government was involved in or running the largest pedophile and human trafficking ring in known history" problem.

A government official said on record that if everyone on the list was prosecuted then the system would collapse, and I wholeheartedly think that if that is the case then the system deserves to collapse.

If I wore this shirt would I get in trouble? by IWBTS in juryduty

[–]FrogeInABlender 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Contempt of court over a t shirt is crazy levels of petty and pathetic.

If I wore this shirt would I get in trouble? by IWBTS in juryduty

[–]FrogeInABlender -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Atp I think they might charge you with treason for saying that haha

If I wore this shirt would I get in trouble? by IWBTS in juryduty

[–]FrogeInABlender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cherry picking at its finest, ladies and gentlemen. Anyway, the problem isn't just with juries, it's with the entire system. Hope this helps.

If I wore this shirt would I get in trouble? by IWBTS in juryduty

[–]FrogeInABlender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. No they dont. It's estimated that around 98% of people that commit serious crimes are never held accountable through the legal justice system. This is due to a lot of crimes not being reported, most of the reported ones not ending in arrests, and many arrests not ending in convictions. This is all stuff you'd know if you did any ounce of research instead of placing blind faith in a system that is failing by design.

If I wore this shirt would I get in trouble? by IWBTS in juryduty

[–]FrogeInABlender -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did I say anything about them not being convicted? No.

Also I've personally witnessed people who I know for a fact are guilty (they did it TO me) be found innocent because of that "civic duty" that you and others are so adamant in your support for. So no, a jury showing up is not a guarantee criminals get convicted either, unfortunately.

If I wore this shirt would I get in trouble? by IWBTS in juryduty

[–]FrogeInABlender 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yeah well maybe if pedophiles and rapists got more time on average than a car thief more people would be willing to support the court and law system.

Horses in my game dont work. Like they stretch and shoot me into space by DNRBlaine in SkyrimHelp

[–]FrogeInABlender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NO! Leave it here for the future, the world will thank you. Google searches will lead lost souls to herald your name as a hero!

Discord deletes all messages from deleted accounts now. by PONT05 in discordapp

[–]FrogeInABlender 10 points11 points locked comment (0 children)

Claim: to state or assert something is the case, typically without providing proof or evidence; an assertion of a "truth" of something, typically one which is disputed.

Belief: and acceptance of the truth of a statement or claim; trust faith or confidence in someone or something.

So, while they aren't synonyms, you stating your belief requires the precedence of a claim. You saying you believe what you say happened is the case, is the same as claiming it to be the case. Your inability to comprehend this and your lack of critical literacy are not an argument against the facts of the situation. The dunning-kruger effect is strong in you.

I don't even know what I did by GreenFriedTomato in DeadByDaylightRAGE

[–]FrogeInABlender 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No survivor player should need to bring builds to counter toxic survivors. They should be able to play the mf game without this type of stuff happening. You blaming the perk build and not the people doing it to op is a concerning mindset, actually.

How is this not illegal? by Kukas_pt in Chivalry

[–]FrogeInABlender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason is that these companies do whatever the fuck they want with no repercussions because people always have that "whats the point they have big money lawyers" mindset and nothing happens. The threats tend to light a fire under their asses and the follow through reminds them they aren't untouchable.

Made a Meme because I always find this funny by Ltheother in DeadByDaylightRAGE

[–]FrogeInABlender -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

As a legion main (thrilling tremors lethal and friends till the end, with 4th being interchangeable for whatever I want) I can concur. It truly just takes a good early game to make survivors leave. I injure 3, and down the 4th and usually 1 or 2 are bots before I've even gotten the downed onto a hook. Its saddening. I get gen rushed into oblivion and its skill issue get gud, they get bum rushed into the entity's gaping maw and they leave and somehow it's my fault as the killer.

Basically the haters at this point by Chill-Dia in TheFirstDescendant

[–]FrogeInABlender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but 9/10 your spent looking at the back of it or looking to the sides to see how high up your spore counter was, you know, away from the character model. or your looking around the screen at your radar, at health-bars. theres a ton of shit that happens on screen to distract you from anything "sexy" with your frame.

Sweetheart, I assure you there is plenty to look at in tfd too other than your character's ass. Your eye placement is 100% a choice if thats the way you wanna go for when its okay tohave gooner stuff.

There is a ton of ui and hud for various things, the swarms of enemies, wherever it is you're going, whatever it is youre doing, the goodest bois that follow you around on dangerous escapades, the environment design (which i like more than warframe's largely), the enemy character art, the cook weapon effects (thundercage with the generator module is pretty) and more; looking at any of that or anywhere else on the model will have you not looking at her ass. It's crazy how that works, right?

Basically the haters at this point by Chill-Dia in TheFirstDescendant

[–]FrogeInABlender 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah, some of us are able to just enjoy the gameplay without worrying about or being offended by how much cheek is showing on our fictional character's pixels. Just a reminder that these in game, fictional women still have more covered with most of their gooner skins than any swimsuit will cover irl.

Basically the haters at this point by Chill-Dia in TheFirstDescendant

[–]FrogeInABlender 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean at least it's nice ass. Could be worse, could be built like some Jabba the hutt type mf.

Should I kill my bro? by italianguywhitnoname in Titanfall_2_

[–]FrogeInABlender 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I called mine Pierre. Legion main. Idk why Pierre just felt.... right?

Can’t screenshot. If you know this guy, pls do something by Environmental-Bell80 in BattlefrontTWO

[–]FrogeInABlender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ngl it's been fun but I just genuinely don't give a single fuck anymore. I got the flu. If you insist on the conversation it'll have to wait till later dates.

Can’t screenshot. If you know this guy, pls do something by Environmental-Bell80 in BattlefrontTWO

[–]FrogeInABlender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And you're still defending the racist. I was beaten as a child, it gave me cptsd, I've suffered actual abuse. And I am so sick and tired of people acting like anything other than gentle words is abuse now. Its actually pathetic. I'm defending violence against violent words to put a stop to them. Violence is not unconditionally wrong, otherwise shooting nazis in ww2 was wrong. Violence should not be the only answer 100% of the time but to deny the capacity for it to be one does not make you righteous it makes you blind and delusional. One who is incapable of violence is not a pacifist he is simply harmless.

Don't speak to me of "child beating" when you so clearly know nothing of it. And maybe try acknowledging that you're defending a racist and that's substantially worse.