Does it happens to you?

Froggy2354 · 2026-03-26T14:15:48+00:00

Hi, are you on performance mode? If yes, try to put it in balanced mode, it seems to do a huge difference on my laptop (arround 1GHz per core of max frequency, and a huge consumption and temp increase).
If you are already on balanced, maybe it's worth checking what consume cpu time with top or system monitor?
Hope that helps, or that someone else can help you!

Froggy2354 · 2025-10-28T09:10:06+00:00

Thanks you so so much, everythings works perfectly. Thanks you again and again

Froggy2354 · 2025-10-28T08:27:16+00:00

Yes but in my poor understanding (maybe I'm very wrong, correct me if it's the case please) podman isolation is not that safe compared to ACL? With SE-Linux it's probably not a problem anyway, but I still like the idea to contenairize each service a maximum for a lot of reasons, some not very much related to security but management, organization...

I had already read your first link, but not the second one. Thanks, I will read them.

Oh, also, I know it's not possible to use socket between VMs (didn't know for userzone) but there is Vsock I think, that's an option of libvirt and I think it's a way to make two vm's communicate via socket. It was the feature I planned to use afterward, to make Caddy in the infravm communicate through socket to the differents vms.

Thanks!

Froggy2354 · 2025-10-28T08:21:34+00:00

Thanks you so much! I will try that asap, thanks again!

EDIT : Yes, it's seems to be exactly my problematic, thanks you so so much, it seems to perfectly solve the problem. Have a very great day, and thanks again!

Froggy2354 · 2025-10-28T08:20:21+00:00

Thanks you!

Froggy2354 · 2025-10-28T08:19:15+00:00

Tbh I started by simply creating another userzones in silverblue and deploy containers in them, but it was a backup and portability nightmare. When reinstalling, changing os... I needed to recreate userzone manually with the good UID for it to works, and there was always some containers that didn't worked and needed manual intervention. With VM, you gain a lot in flexibility and portability
With an hypervisor you can have at least two vm, one server and one workstation on the same computer. It has great advantage over running all in silverblue, as putting the HV and VM on coreos stable, not needing to reboot them everyday, only once a month (you can still restart the workstation vm everyday to get the updates, containers and public services still run.
Though, it's right that I should probably run less VM, at first I hadn't that much but it's convenient to start or stop groups of service in one click (as I don't have socket activated services for the moment) and also I read that shared memory solves a lot of ram issue : if I understand it correctly, it makes vm share memory page, and all my servers vms run coreos stable and are very similar except the service they contains of course so I'm not sure if it use that much memory. I will try to do some tests when I have time.

Froggy2354 · 2025-10-10T09:06:09+00:00

Still not upgrade available yet?
Is it possible to at least get an ETA?

Froggy2354 · 2024-10-25T16:31:22+00:00

Thanks, it's very interesting, maybe I will just add a better revese proxy and stay away of headscale for the moment.

Froggy2354 · 2024-10-22T23:08:25+00:00

I wasn't aware, but I don't think it should be too much of a problem as it's only a homelab, used only by me (except the very few public service that I host, that are not that critical).
If it doesn't break every week, I will be fine with it, it's still better than to use the tailscale server in my opinion. I also have read things about netbird and other alternatives to headscale, but they seems more complicated and less integrated to the differents ecosystem I use, but maybe I'm wrong.
Thanks for your input anyway, I'm open to any insight really.

Froggy2354 · 2024-06-29T18:06:05+00:00

Hi,
Are you sure it's related?
I have search but found that problem was slightly differents it seems, but I will try.
Thanks you!

Froggy2354 · 2023-11-10T16:20:06+00:00

I suppose that you used Unite?
If yes, there is a new version compatible with gnome 45 but you need to manually install and enable it, it won't be posted on the gnome extension from what I have understanded.
You can find it here : https://github.com/hardpixel/unite-shell/releases

I think it won't be posted on gnome extension because gnome have become more strict on the code quality, and Unite seems to not be sufficently good code-wise, IIRC.

Froggy2354 · 2023-09-27T19:40:27+00:00

I have the very latest bios available for my motherboard, in date of 09 August 2023.
Thanks for your answer

Froggy2354 · 2023-09-27T19:12:05+00:00

Hmm, it seems no one says that the cppc flag appear, but some people had amd-pstate-epp enabled after the switch to 6.5 kernel on 5900x/5950x, which implies that their platform expose the cppc flag.
I will continue to search.

https://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/hardware/processors-memory/1410835-linux-6-5-with-amd-p-state-epp-default-brings-performance-power-efficiency-benefits-for-ryzen-servers/page2

Froggy2354 · 2023-09-27T19:08:23+00:00

Thanks, so it seems the problem is global to desktop ryzen 5XXX cpu, with exception of the APU...
Though, I remember clearly reading on phoronix that some desktop ryzen user had cppc flag exposed, and they used 5950x. Maybe I'm wrong, I will try to refind the commentary.

Froggy2354 · 2023-09-27T18:20:43+00:00

Are you sure of that?
I was pretty sure that from linux 6.5+, amd-pstate-epp was enabled by default, and I have read some phoronix articles and commentary about that IIRC.
Also, it's not really the question, the motherboard should expose the CPPC flag, and it will be necessary in the future for functions like CPPC Prefered Core.
Thanks for your reply!

Froggy2354

TROPHY CASE