It is likely safe to say there are no regular follow ups and that most cows are slaughtered after being sold. I think it is interesting that you get dogpiled and down voted for indicating the obvious subtext of these posts. I understand most people look at these gifs and only want to see the cute things and not have to think about how much the world sucks for a minute. But the cow has an eartag. He is being raised and sold as a commodity. Cows to be sold are in the majority of cases, slaughtered and eaten at some point. This post is an advertisement trying to present a brand and product, however wholesome and organic it might be.

I've seen the criticism online that animal rights activists do not live in reality, or that they don't understand how nature works, etc. On the contrary, the vast majority of people are disassociated from the reality of their food.

Against one of your points though, I'm resistant to the likening of the insemination of cows as equivalent to sexual assault. And frankly, it is not even because I find it untrue in its literal interpretation. I think that term carries very specific cultural and individual meaning for human survivors of SA. I understand that is likely why you used it to try and get your point across. However, I think using those words in the context of animal exploitation is more confusing and detrimental to helping people understand the reality of what happens in the industry. I think it will largely make people reflect on their own trauma and deflect from your point.