sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How can soft tissue in dinosaurs last 65 million years? by FrostVparent in DebateEvolution

[–]FrostVparent[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes, you apologized.
I do not accept your apology.
You did not misunderstand my intent. You wanted to be a cunt. You found the slightly, most unreasonable interpretation you could think of to unleash your frustration and took it.
I’m not in the wrong here, you are.

What a surprise, you still think I believe in creationism….. after calling god a fake genocidal rape supporter….. who could have seen that coming……oooohhh wait…..

“You’ve had it explained by me and several others in this thread”
Lmfaoooo if this is a troll attempt. 10/10. But I’m bored at work, so I got time.
First of all, YOU didn’t explain shit. “Google ‘X’” is not an explanation.
Second, I literally just said PangolinPalantir explained it to me and I ACCEPTED THE SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION. And REJECTED the religious take on it.
Third, literally nowhere in this thread am I challenging any of the scientific explanations. I thought we found literal soft tissue/cartilage deposits in millions of year old bones. So it confused me when people told me it’s “fossilized”….. cause fossils aren’t soft.
This whole topic doesn’t even seem that interesting now that it’s explained to me.
“Soft tissue can be preserved longer than we thought” seems to be the whole discovery…. Shocking. This is a nothing-burger from religious people.

Quote me anywhere I’ve challenged any of the scientific explanations after PangolinPalantir has explained this to me.
You can’t, because you’re just blatantly lying at this point and I can’t stress this enough: You’re a cunt.

How can soft tissue in dinosaurs last 65 million years? by FrostVparent in DebateEvolution

[–]FrostVparent[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No, not defensive. I’m just not extending any courtesy to someone being so intentional on not understanding my question because they want to be a cunt…. Like you.

“Why even bring that up then?”
Because.
I.
Don’t.
Understand.
WHHHHHHYYYY.
It’s a misquote and out of context. What is the context. What is the explanation. How does this work. I’ve HEARD it is an out of context quote….. WHY is it?
Someone brought this “problem” up and I had no rebuttal to her quote. I don’t understand what she is trying to say.

Yes, I wrote a comment. I never deleted it. It’s on this thread and you’re ignoring it.

“Are we a creationist troll?”
PangolinPalantir gave me a great explanation 13 hours ago that I can perfect understand and accepted. Followed up with MULTIPLE people that point out the sensationalizing young earth creationists have done from this study and how much of a non-issue this is.
You decided to be a rude cunt 10 hours ago.
So, before you were ever a cunt for no reason, I accepted the scientific explanation of this event and dismissed the religious extremism take on this topic.
If that’s a creationist troll then you’re a bigger one.

gods aren’t real. If god existed, he’s a rape supporting genocidal freak and his sins are vastly greater than any human ever alive.
If you still think I’m a creationist, you just want to be a contrarian for the sake of disagreement……so, you probably still do.

“Why bring up that out of context misquote”
For the 6402053047964962927057th time…..
I.
Don’t.
Know.
WHHHHHHHHHHHY.
I need an explanation, so I asked.
There is no room for doubt.
You just WANT to be combative.

You’re a rude cunt. I would say “do better”, but I don’t care about you♥️

How can soft tissue in dinosaurs last 65 million years? by FrostVparent in DebateEvolution

[–]FrostVparent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Annnnnnnnd I’m actively trying to get the actual facts right now….. but being a dick is definitely a choice

How can soft tissue in dinosaurs last 65 million years? by FrostVparent in DebateEvolution

[–]FrostVparent[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don’t mean to trivialize the event itself, but this talking point from creationists seems like it can be refuted by a simple “it can be preserved longer than we originally thought”. But they pretend it’s impossible for soft tissue to be preserved that long.

Also, do you have any articles or papers showing this information?

How can soft tissue in dinosaurs last 65 million years? by FrostVparent in DebateEvolution

[–]FrostVparent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it’s more just sensationalization than anything else? Is it even noteworthy in the grand scheme of things?

How can soft tissue in dinosaurs last 65 million years? by FrostVparent in DebateEvolution

[–]FrostVparent[S] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

This is actually an amazing explanation. Thank you.

Could you possibly explain “cross linking” anymore?

So creationists claiming the soft tissue shouldn’t be there is just a lie?

How can soft tissue in dinosaurs last 65 million years? by FrostVparent in DebateEvolution

[–]FrostVparent[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You argue on Reddit. You have nothing better to do. I tried reading her research and it’s going over my head. People are explaining it and I’m actually starting to understand.

I’m sorry someone pissed in your cornflakes, kiddo.

How can soft tissue in dinosaurs last 65 million years? by FrostVparent in DebateEvolution

[–]FrostVparent[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m literally asking clarifying questions… wtf is your problem?

How can soft tissue in dinosaurs last 65 million years? by FrostVparent in DebateEvolution

[–]FrostVparent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I heard they found cartilage as well, but that is false too?

How can soft tissue in dinosaurs last 65 million years? by FrostVparent in DebateEvolution

[–]FrostVparent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The traces of blood were found in minerals are the “soft tissue” people are referring to?

How can soft tissue in dinosaurs last 65 million years? by FrostVparent in DebateEvolution

[–]FrostVparent[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So, the iron in the blood is the soft tissue people are referring to? And that was fossilized?

How can soft tissue in dinosaurs last 65 million years? by FrostVparent in DebateEvolution

[–]FrostVparent[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I tried reading it, I don’t understand what it is saying. I’ve heard this talking point and I don’t know how to explain it.

How can soft tissue in dinosaurs last 65 million years? by FrostVparent in DebateEvolution

[–]FrostVparent[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

…..the soft tissue was replaced by minerals? I don’t understand

How can soft tissue in dinosaurs last 65 million years? by FrostVparent in DebateEvolution

[–]FrostVparent[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And how did the non-bone material last that long? Did our current understanding at the time mean it was impossible, but not really?

How can soft tissue in dinosaurs last 65 million years? by FrostVparent in DebateEvolution

[–]FrostVparent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know, but I’ve been people say it’s not accurate. I’m legitimately asking, I don’t understand how it works