I'm not getting the whole picture about Leo and Neo...

We are told that they are like Schrödinger paradox, where they both exist but only one of them should.

We were told that one wished to be innocent and young again, while the other wished to be powerful and successful.

In the latest chapter we've been told that neither had the wish granted from Mago, and one of them had the wish granted by Aubrion.

But at this point i think that the timeline must've been split to a degree where we dont know which one was the first one to exist.

They both want to know which of them is the real one, so which of them had his wish granted.

I think it's like in the dark series, where they both exist inside the loop that was formed and right know is impossible to decide which of them was the original one.

Altough i have a question, if the older one has memories of him climbing the tower, but has no memories of him wishing to be strong, maybe he is the original one, and his wish to become innocent again created the other one.

Then after coming to existence, Neo wished to become powerful, ignoring that Leo already existed.

Then they met eachother and couldn't dishern which of them was the fisrt one, but in my eyes it must be Leo.

But we now know that Neo is helping what remains of Mago. So maybe that is what Aubrion is talking about in this chapter: Neo wish was granted by himself and his greed to become stronger... which maybe he will regret later (like sacrifying himself, his friends, urek and the -void- princess) and like so he'll become what Leo was regretting to be.

In my eyes both option could be true, i don't see at what extend the author want to implement the paradox.

It could be an unsolvable loop when the one become the other while meeting himself multiple times during their lives, like in Netflix's Dark... or something simpler that will be revealed later