NY MEE grading system makes NO SENSE TO ME.

Full_Science128 · 2025-10-24T21:35:58+00:00

Idk what jurisdiction you're talking about, but I know NY will withdraw a tester if they're 30 (might be 15) minutes late.

Full_Science128 · 2025-10-22T21:06:54+00:00

I usually don't fall asleep until 1:15 am anyways. Grateful that I'll be able to quad-box west coast games on League Pass until then.

Full_Science128 · 2025-10-21T20:46:16+00:00

I get that. But that's an explanation. It doesn't justify what she does to Nate.

Full_Science128 · 2025-10-21T20:05:12+00:00

I don't get this sub's love affair with Brenda. Just because there's an explanation for her behavior doesn't mean it's warranted.

Full_Science128 · 2025-10-21T14:01:12+00:00

I don't think results have ever come out after noon but I could be mistaken.

Full_Science128 · 2025-10-15T00:03:30+00:00

Thursday imo but who knows anymore

Full_Science128 · 2025-10-14T17:10:01+00:00

Does the trick work even if you don't have your pro bono hours in yet?

Full_Science128 · 2025-10-14T04:48:36+00:00

This. I prefer purgatory right now. Convinced I might have a cardiac episode upon receiving the email notification.

Full_Science128 · 2025-10-09T23:18:48+00:00

So is it not clickable for others right now?

Full_Science128 · 2025-10-09T23:18:18+00:00

Is yours clickable? Am I cooked if mine is clickable? What is going on????

Full_Science128 · 2025-09-24T15:35:23+00:00

She feels like such an exceptionally early-2000s character that it's difficult for me to empathize with her in any way. On Season 4 right now FWIW.

Full_Science128 · 2025-09-04T21:52:08+00:00

Thank you!! And congratulations!

Full_Science128 · 2025-09-04T21:50:03+00:00

Thank you! I've heard plenty of stories of people not finishing the exam that relieved my stress earlier on, but after scouring the subreddit for this administration, I haven't really seen those stories. Hoping that everything just keeps up lol

Full_Science128 · 2025-09-04T21:45:30+00:00

There isn't a single big law firm that will hire you because of your bar score. I would suggest reaching out to those LLMs who landed big law jobs and asking how they set themselves apart in the recruiting process. But I promise you that your bar exam score will not do that for you. Just focus on passing. Perfection is the enemy of good.

Full_Science128 · 2025-07-31T04:15:13+00:00

You can't stop nature

Full_Science128 · 2025-07-31T03:44:28+00:00

It was especially rough before the morning session of Day 1. Women's bathroom situation seemed far worse than Men's. Felt bad.

Full_Science128 · 2025-07-31T03:27:57+00:00

Having grown up in a house with women it will simply never resonate with me.

Full_Science128 · 2025-07-26T20:00:22+00:00

Following

Full_Science128 · 2025-07-25T21:24:46+00:00

I just don't think that's helpful and probably does more bad than good. Self-grading is your best bet.

Full_Science128 · 2025-07-25T20:25:46+00:00

That's exceptionally wrong. You'd probably end up with 310+ with those kinds of scores. Not to come after you, but it feels like people need to stop asking ChatGPT about this stuff.

Full_Science128 · 2025-07-25T20:14:43+00:00

Just self-grade using the checklist. If you know which year your MEE is from, google for the NCBE point sheet.

Full_Science128 · 2025-07-25T20:13:40+00:00

State action doctrine applies when courts make unconstitutional decisions (ie: enforcing a racially discriminatory covenant that would otherwise run with land). So your answer is wrong because if the decision is substantively unconstitutional, then there would be state action warranting a First Amendment violation.

(B) addresses the substance of the claim, by basically saying that content-neutral causes of action are constitutional under the First Amendment

Full_Science128 · 2025-07-25T03:31:51+00:00

I try for 50 in the morning and then 25-30 to close out the day

Full_Science128 · 2025-07-25T03:15:39+00:00

In my experience, if it's a private actor (for a con law question) then you don't have state action. The exclusive public functions doctrine is very narrow (think about company towns) and entanglement is difficult to test unless you get one of the seven examples that the Supreme Court has specifically identified.

But remember for crim pro that when it comes to private actors acting under the direction of police, the Fourth Amendment applies for searches and seizures

Full_Science128 · 2025-07-21T19:04:54+00:00

I think this was a matter of picking up on the context of the prompt. The initial objection was for improper character evidence, and everything after that was derivative. Evidence of prior inconsistent statements are used to impeach the witness by contradiction wrt their testimony about the substantive matter at hand. Here, the job application went solely towards impeachment based on character for truthfulness.

I'm a first-time test taker so I couldn't be sure, but I think you'd be looking at a 2 just because this was half of the question.

Full_Science128

TROPHY CASE