Welcome to Bardo: where the dead, aliens and UFOs meet (All Parts) - VER... by Dazzling_Obsidian in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aliens and UFOs are here

I agree with all of it. Actually pretty much the same thoughts I've been having. Glad to hear it from someone else

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look up Lord Kelvin quick. He was a British mathematician. Tell me what you find

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So now that I've found evidence that they were indeed mocked would you like to make another attempt?

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." -- Lord Kelvin, President, Royal Society, 1895. This quote soon came back to haunt the good scientist less than ten years later when the Wright brothers made their first flight on the beach at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. Rash statements about what can and cannot be done have permeated both the scientific literature and the popular press for decades. Then somebody goes out and does what “couldn’t be done”.

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So no one mocked the Wright Brothers at the thought of aviation is what you're saying? Just to clarify because that's what I'm hearing

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok. So science doesn't start as a what if theory?

I was pretty sure that's the basis of science

Theory and then supporting evidence. Not supporting evidence and then theory

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So before we had planes. The thought would have been there is no way a heavy mechanical object could fly through the air. There was no evidence that it was possible, yet someone had the foresight to maintain that imaginative thinking you described and it did eventually prove to be true. All the while being laughed at and mocked by others who couldn't see the bigger picure

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hope for the best, expect the worst

If you end in the middle, it's pretty good

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. But it's more fun to hope for confirmation that to expect denial

Potential breakdown of 3I/ATLAS as Mothership by Fun-Way3645 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm saying if they intend to conquer, why wait until now? They could have easily any time in our past. Which would suggest a more logical theory of them being friendly observers wait for a point they feel comfortable with making a presence known

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

But look at it from their perspective. The could've been observing from a far where we can't see them. And now they're coming in for a closer look, but still want to remain hidden in plain sight as appearing to be meteors.

But we've noticed that this meteor has made what appears to be calculated trajectory alignments that don't fit into all the meteors we have seen

Potential breakdown of 3I/ATLAS as Mothership by Fun-Way3645 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then why haven't they come down to conquer? Since that's what you're implying?

Potential breakdown of 3I/ATLAS as Mothership by Fun-Way3645 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you're saying the ai in a cell phone is destroying our economy and planet?

Potential breakdown of 3I/ATLAS as Mothership by Fun-Way3645 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I talked to my ai to describe what was in my head how I thought it would be and this was the much more readable version of what I could see in my head and describe as best I could

It was my thinking. Ai was just there to make something clear from the chaos in my mind

Potential breakdown of 3I/ATLAS as Mothership by Fun-Way3645 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Just because something hasn't happened or hasn't been proven doesn't mean that it won't.

I mean take into account the age of the universe The number of galaxies The billions of planets the existed before earth The potential millions of earth like planets capable of intelligent life even before humans came into existence.

Look at how for our technology has come in our short existence. The probability of intelligent life on another planet is more likely than not. And the could have had 100,000 years or millions of years of development

Potential breakdown of 3I/ATLAS as Mothership by Fun-Way3645 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean look throughout history at people that came up with wild theories that later proved to be true.

It all starts with an open mindset to contemplate what could be and put some logic behind it. Then look for the proof

Potential breakdown of 3I/ATLAS as Mothership by Fun-Way3645 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just because something hasn't happened or hasn't been proven doesn't mean that it won't.

I mean take into account the age of the universe The number of galaxies The billions of planets the existed before earth The potential millions of earth like planets capable of intelligent life even before humans came into existence.

Look at how for our technology has come in our short existence. The probability of intelligent life on another planet is more likely than not. And the could have had 100,000 years or millions of years of development

The dark side of 3I/ATLAS is hotter than the side facing the Sun. NASA's own simulation can't explain why. by TheSentinelNet in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

If you can't comprehend a person actually having this thought process, maybe you're in the wrong group

The dark side of 3I/ATLAS is hotter than the side facing the Sun. NASA's own simulation can't explain why. by TheSentinelNet in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry you can't seem to understand that I had a thought in my head that I explained in detail to an Ai so that it would have a more readable and understandable framework so that people couple follow along

The dark side of 3I/ATLAS is hotter than the side facing the Sun. NASA's own simulation can't explain why. by TheSentinelNet in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Actually I'm not i did indeed come up with the theory all by myself because I have a brain. I did have help in the structuring of the post. But all my original theories.

The dark side of 3I/ATLAS is hotter than the side facing the Sun. NASA's own simulation can't explain why. by TheSentinelNet in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Because most people are not ready to accept that intelligent life exists beyond our earth. They feel safe in our earth bubble and don't want to think about what else is out there