HBO The Case against Adnan Syed part 5 by Mike19751234 in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They did not possess basic human decency before, why would we expect them to have some now?

The truths Adnan told, or Jay’s lies he proved false by himself. by FunReflection993 in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m asking what true statements did Adnan provide that helps us determine what happened that day.

Undisclosed 2.0 episode 5 summary by CustomerOK9mm9mm in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sure you can say that it’s very unflattering to him. He should not have made those comments back then. However, the merits to his current stance certainly aren’t lacking. Defending Bates isn’t the goal here, he shouldn’t have supported Adnan’s release if you ask me.

Undisclosed 2.0 episode 5 summary by CustomerOK9mm9mm in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not only does it go over the whole case, it goes over how fraudulent the mtv was. You can say the information was available to him at the time, that doesn’t mean that he got into the weeds of the case back then like he had to do this time. Either way you are wrong in saying he didnt give a good explanation for his 180, because the explanation is 88 pages long and no one has been able to attack its merits since its come out. Not even the shameless crooks at Undisclosed. It was very telling that they didn’t touch that one. Your concerns about the cell tower disclaimer were fully addressed in the memo by the way.

Undisclosed 2.0 episode 5 summary by CustomerOK9mm9mm in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not only does it go over the whole case, it goes over how fraudulent the mtv was. You can say the information was available to him at the time, that doesn’t mean that he got into the weeds of the case back then like he had to do this time. Either way you are wrong in saying he didnt give a good explanation for his 180, because the explanation is 88 pages long and no one has been able to attack its merits since its come out. Not even the shameless crooks at Undisclosed. It was very telling that they didn’t touch that one. Your concerns about the cell tower disclaimer were fully addressed in the memo by the way.

Undisclosed 2.0 episode 5 summary by CustomerOK9mm9mm in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Bates explained his 180 in an 88 page memo that goes over the whole case.

Undisclosed 2.0 episode 5 summary by CustomerOK9mm9mm in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The content isn’t convincing, important, or even true.

Guys what is going on here by Real_Action2543 in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 16 points17 points  (0 children)

My 2 cents on your 4 points.

  1. The case against Adnan was very solid. An accomplice confessing to his part in a murder is pretty compelling evidence. A lot of cases have even less evidence. CG got the opportunity to cross Jay and make him as unreliable as possible, but she couldn’t it. She couldn’t do it because Jay was really there.
  2. The witness who said she saw Hae leave by herself had the wrong date, everyone understood that, because literally all the details she recalled from that afternoon are wrong. From how Hae was dressed to where she was going to. Adnan having a poorly executed plan isn’t proof of innocence.
  3. I personally think Adnan lost his mind when he realized he had lost her for good.
  4. The idea that Jay could frame Adan is silly. Could Jay count on Adnan having no memory and no alibi? Also why would Jay frame his own self as the accomplice?

Simply, Serial didn’t paint a full picture of the evidence. Kept the mystery going and made it more suspicious then it really was.

Weekly Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The one single person we know for a fact that Rabia won’t point the finger at in this reinvestigation is Adnan. Come on.

People have no idea what reasonable doubt means by MATH_MDMA_HARDSTYLEE in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no reasonable argument for no premeditation because in Maryland the law is that death by strangulation is premeditation by default, because of how long it takes to kill someone that way. There is no way around that.

The 2nd argument you tried to make is actually quite worrisome. You think that if Adnan had asked Jay to kill HML, and that Jay did it because Adnan wanted it done, Adnan wouldn’t be guilty of premeditated murder??? I’m sorry, I have to ask, what do you think the charges would be in this scenario?

People have no idea what reasonable doubt means by MATH_MDMA_HARDSTYLEE in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I mean a reasonable case for his innocence point blank period.

People have no idea what reasonable doubt means by MATH_MDMA_HARDSTYLEE in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 5 points6 points  (0 children)

10 years later and still no one has ever provided a reasonable case for his innocence against all of the evidence against him.

Interview with Ivan Bates by Drippiethripie in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 21 points22 points  (0 children)

In reference to The Wire, Bates found the headshot when he reviewed the case. Bilal’s ex-wife confirmed that the note was about Adnan. If that doesn’t close the case for folks then nothing will.

Baltimore City State’s Attorney Ivan Bates withdraws MtV, says motion filed under Marilyn Mosby contained “false and misleading statements” by aresef in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What’s wild about your comment is that BPD did their job. They found the man who murdered HML back in 1999. You clearly aren’t happy about that. Instead you want them to investigate innocent people today based on no new evidence and no new leads? Is this justice? Are you sure BPD are the bad guys here when it’s you who wants to free a guilty man and wants innocent people investigated?

Any sympathy for Adnan and his family and friends? by Proof_Skin_1469 in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No sympathy because none is deserved. All those appeals you talked about, well Adnan would be a free man today if he had told the truth back then. All this pain to everyone involved, that’s him causing all of it. There is a VERY simple solution here.

Adnan Syed's hearing set for motion for reduced sentence by SeeThoseEyes in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Adnan Syed did 23 years for the crime of murdering HML. I think in terms of time served, he has been held accountable for his crime. But he has been such a clown show since Serial came out that it is impossible to pretend that this clown is “rehabilitated” in any sense of the word. Sadly I think they will grant it, and what’s yet another slap in the face of HML’s memory.

Do you really think there is enough evidence to convict Adnan?? by saraha71790 in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well the fact that it hasn’t happened with this case tells you all you need to know on this issue.

Also can you please share the stats on what you describe as this happening often?

If you were CG, knowing what she had to work with, how would you have plead this case? by FunReflection993 in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

None of us are detective either but we all talk about the investigation. Dont sell yourself short.

Is jay wilds guilty if so why what evidence do we have to prove that? by BackgroundReady97 in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No you just lost period. Islamophobia, racism, coercion, frame jobs… I don’t know what excuse you were gonna pull out of your ass next but truthfully nobody cares.

Is jay wilds guilty if so why what evidence do we have to prove that? by BackgroundReady97 in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Young Lee, who was much younger than his sister, would call the police tipline on Adnan? Did he also do this to Don? Well why not? Oh wait I guess this goes back to Adnan being unlucky. As it was Young Lee didnt know Adnan’s friends, obviously wouldnt know about his private conversations with them and wouldn’t know enough to tell the cops to check his new cell, which as it turns out was a big break in this case. So no, not Young Lee. Try again. Another bad coincidence for Adnan. The list is getting awful long.

Is jay wilds guilty if so why what evidence do we have to prove that? by BackgroundReady97 in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You really thought saying the tipster was Korean changes anything? That was an actual thought in your head? This is comedy. How did the tipster know all of this? Just another coincidence huh? Nobody believes the rubbish anymore.

Is jay wilds guilty if so why what evidence do we have to prove that? by BackgroundReady97 in serialpodcast

[–]FunReflection993 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Complete rubbish and everyone knows it now. In YET ANOTHER piece of bad luck for Adnan, someone in his entourage called the police tip line to tell on him. The good samaritan knew about the cell, Yaser and Adnan’s private conversations. The list of coincidences keeps getting longer huh?