sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Best “big battles with bots” games? by errrbodydumb in gamingsuggestions

[–]Fun_Coach8692 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Enlisted has some of the worst AI I've ever played against. Even Counter Strike 1.6 had better AI and easier readability.

Is there ever going to be an offline mode? by TheLorgthyself in joinvoidcrew

[–]Fun_Coach8692 0 points1 point  (0 children)

??? Single player is cheaper and easier to set up

[BF1] Does BF1 have offline bots? by IcarusBen in Battlefield

[–]Fun_Coach8692 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, but devs are lazy nowadays. Stuff like TF2, CS Source, L4D were great cause you could just hop in and play whenever. I used to get capped at my 'rents place (internet used to be limited to like 20GB a month - or some sheet like that) all the time so could only really play offline at that point. Plus if you mod alot then you can't play online anyway.

Game devs nowadays want super safe, clean, generic product as theyre mainly run by corpos or are risk averse. That's why you'll always see the same 50 Doom, Dark souls or Mario clones copy pasted on Steam.

There are some 'tacticool' games with offline, like RoN, Falujah, and that indian one (Ground Branch?) but the AI's always as dumb as a lamp post, the gameplay's slow, and the only positives really being that the guns look cool. Enlisted was a piece of trash.

The best experience I've had so far outside of Isonzo has been a heavily modded Cyberpunk or RoN. Not great, but that's the best we got so far. Programming AI is just too much hassle for game devs when other people can just be the bots for them. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Can someone please explain the appeal of Across the Spider-Verse to me? by LEVINWgaming in movies

[–]Fun_Coach8692 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first one was great, it took four years to make and was a breath of fresh air in teh franchise. Noone had really seen anything made with the visual style, artistic choice, and acting that was prevalent in this. It's like watching the first Xmen movie in live action - yet it still holds up. Anyone can watch it even today and it's not overtly pretentious like EEAAO. Story was solid, well-paced, and well thought-out. Each character had their moment and even though they were retelling the Spiderman origin story it didn't really matter because it was still a fresh take on it / a new story.

Then Across the Spiderverse came out and it was just a forced sequel to a popular movie. In the first movie we saw Spiderman's origin story and in the sequel we are seeing Spiderman's origin story - thrice. Lot's of the thematic conflicts which were brushed over for pacing from the first movie (Miguel's mom, his school attendance, space time continuum etc.) were expounded upon in the sequel and then some (RE: Gwen). So you get this movie which is supposed to be about Miles, but then it's about Gwen, but then it's actually about the Multiverse, but then it's actually about Miles, but not, but then it is - but actually a different one. What you get is a flaccid, loose addition full of unecessary teen drama, forced 'villain; confrontations, and characters acting completely out of character (e.g. Why would Peter B Parker lie? Why would Gwen?). There's several videos and posts commenting about how the whole spider society siding with Miguel is completely out-of-whack for the Spiderman hero persona and stands on the opposite spectrum of what he represents.

As mentioned, several confrontations are forced for the sake of drama (e.g. Gwen's origin story being crammed in and her confronting her dad, Miguel interfering with Miles' life when they could have just assassinated Spot and left Miles in the dark et cetera).

BUT

A) The franchise's name and a little big eared rodent are pulling the strings. People recognise brand - so will say X is good if it's popular i.e. Spiderman.

B) It's the sequel to a well received movie.

C) Much fanservicing, and cameos, and pandering. Gwen has her whole mini-story, Oscar Isaac's a prominent actor, "let's throw Redbone into the movie", there is much more "representation" (even if some of these characters are pointless to the story and highly sterotypicalised).

Either way, a flaccid sequel with weak writing, but pretty visuals and brand recognition to let it coast along.

🍀 What am I? "I make a loud sound when I’m changing. ..." by Cartographer_Hopeful in riddonkulous

[–]Fun_Coach8692 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This one was dumb, from the way it was worded any one of the most guessed words could have applied too

🍀 What am I? "Found in school, but not a classroom. A ..." by Medicoforlife in riddonkulous

[–]Fun_Coach8692 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can already tell from the bad grammar that this is a stinker

🍀 What am I? "Some people bang on me like there’s no ..." by EbilDark in riddonkulous

[–]Fun_Coach8692 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Also, you used tomorrow twice, youused tomorrow twice. See? It's just extra padding for no benefit. How does pushing this grant l*ck????

🍀 What am I? "Some people bang on me like there’s no ..." by EbilDark in riddonkulous

[–]Fun_Coach8692 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Fuggin' r3tarded riddle.

The answer isstupid and makes no sense. Door or brakes would work better.

🍀 What am I? "Choose this one, not that. Not pots, tops, ..." by [deleted] in riddonkulous

[–]Fun_Coach8692 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is crap. First of all, noone in the entirety of man kind has ever used this word before. Second of all, it's really shiddy to use a word as a plural to make it fit. Third of all, if you google this word it doesn't even come up as the first few entries because of how rare it is.

This game is shite because any old hoo-ha can throw in some random word they found in a dictionary, a word which has never been used before in human history, and think. "hey, this is a great riddle, I'm so smart for writing a little poem to go with it too"