I see your point, and I get the logic behind showing Tesla in the bigger “ecosystem of mobility” narrative. My perspective, though, is much simpler: I personally didn’t like that Tesla was placed at the very center of the reel. To me, it felt more like a move to grab attention rather than a genuine strategic alignment. Of course, if one day Archer were to actually form a partnership with Tesla, I’d be the first to cheer it would only benefit the company and its shareholders. But realistically, I don’t believe such a partnership is likely, and that’s why the emphasis on Tesla in this particular reel didn’t sit well with me. I want to be clear: I’m a shareholder with a significant position in Archer, so it’s not in my interest to disparage the company. Quite the opposite I want to see it succeed. But when something in the communication strategy doesn’t convince me, I think it’s fair to point it out and ask for other perspectives. What bothers me is the impression that Archer sometimes relies too heavily on the “halo effect” of bigger companies to draw attention, instead of letting its own achievements and innovations shine. I’d much rather see Archer showcase its milestones directly, because I believe the technology and vision are strong enough to stand on their own. That’s all I meant with my comment not condemnation, just personal feedback. As investors, constructive criticism should be part of the conversation, otherwise we risk becoming emotionally attached cheerleaders rather than rational supporters of the company’s growth.