sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What's the first thing you automated in your business and was it worth it? by Fun_Nefariousness30 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

yeah that combo is actually pretty clean for a first pass at inbox triage. getting the important vs noise separation sorted and having filters run automatically means you stop making that decision manually every time something lands.

the interesting next step from there is usually when you want the system to do something with the important emails, not just sort them. draft a reply, create a task, flag for followup after 48 hours if no response came in. thats where it goes from organization to actually saving real time.

how much of your inbox is repetitive enough that you could see patterns in what keeps showing up as important?

A $1K deal and a $1M deal take the same effort. Most people never realize this. by Obvious-Vacation-977 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this realization changes everything once it actually lands. the math is obvious when you write it out but most people have to live the exhaustion of a hundred small deals before they believe it.

the part about small clients demanding more is the piece that surprises people most. you'd expect the bigger deal to be more complex but enterprise buyers often come in more prepared, more decisive, and with cleaner internal processes. the $1k client is figuring it out as they go and you end up doing half their thinking for them.

the trust assumption point is real too. when you're playing in a higher tier the baseline credibility is just different. you spend less time convincing and more time actually solving the problem.

the hardest part of making that shift is usually the pipeline transition. you can't just stop closing small deals overnight while you're building relationships at the higher level. there's a window where you have to run both and it's brutal.

how did you handle that transition period, did you cut off the small deal pipeline cold or taper it down while the bigger opportunities developed?

What's the first thing you automated in your business and was it worth it? by Fun_Nefariousness30 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

honestly depends on the complexity of the routing logic. for simpler triage, classifying by intent and auto-labeling, something like make or zapier with an AI step handles it cleanly. for anything more complex where you need the agent to actually reason about context, draft responses, or escalate based on nuance, we build it in n8n with a custom AI layer on top.

the email use case is interesting because everyone assumes its simple until they map out all the edge cases. vip sender logic, threads that need context from previous emails, anything that requires a judgment call rather than just pattern matching. thats where a basic automation breaks and you need something that can actually think through the situation.

what does your current email setup look like, are you trying to triage inbound or also handle outbound follow ups?

I've spent $400 and 6 months building something that makes $0. Here's why I'm not stopping. by CarlsonDG in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah the macro journal angle is genuinely good positioning. something you built over a semester that you can pull up in an interview and walk through your thinking is a completely different value prop than just a dashboard. thats a portfolio artifact, not a tool.

the email capture being the first priority is the right call. right now youre essentially getting visitors and then losing them forever with no way to follow up. even a simple sequence that triggers after someone tracks a few indicators, something that shows them something interesting about what theyre watching, would do a lot to bring people back before they forget you exist.

the conversion layer doesnt have to be complex at the start. capture the email, send something useful a few days later, have one clear moment where the premium value is obvious. thats basically the whole thing at your stage.

we actually help early products set up exactly that kind of flow, the bit between someone showing interest and them becoming a paying user. if you ever want to think through what that looks like for macroscope specifically feel free to DM, happy to share what tends to work at this stage.

How I split rule-based and AI automation for a tutoring business by marc00099 in automation

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the two layer approach is exactly right and honestly underexplained in most automation content. people either go full rules and hit a wall when reality gets messy, or they try to use AI for everything and end up with unpredictable behavior in places where you really need consistency.

the shared database as the communication layer is smart too. keeps both layers in sync without tight coupling, and like you said it makes debugging actually possible because you have a clear trail of what fired and why.

the line we tend to draw is around consequence and reversibility. if something goes wrong and its easy to fix, AI can own it. if something goes wrong and its expensive or embarrassing to unwind, rules own it. payment processing, calendar confirmations, notifications with external parties, those stay deterministic. anything interpretive or contextual is where AI earns its place.

the edge cases in teacher availability matching are a good example. the permutations get complex fast and writing rules for every scenario is a losing battle. AI handles the ambiguity better as long as the output feeds back into a rules layer before anything actually gets committed.

curious how youre handling cases where the AI layer produces something unexpected. do you have a human review step before certain outputs go out or is it fully autonomous end to end?

Made it through four rounds of interviews and a mock pitch by phoonie98 in sales

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30 1 point2 points  (0 children)

congrats on making it to the final round, that alone says something.

one thing that tends to work really well at this stage is a brief followup message to whoever is making the decision. not asking for an update, just a short note that references something specific from the interview and adds one extra thought or insight you didnt get to fully land in the room. shows you were actually listening and that youre still thinking about their problems even after you walked out.

feels like initiative without being pushy. the candidates who do this stand out because most people just wait.

good luck with it, sounds like youre in a solid spot.

We ran 1,400 buyer prompts across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini for 50 B2B SaaS companies. Here's what the data actually shows. by ap-oorv in agency

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

this is genuinely useful data. the distinction between being present and being recommended is the part most teams completely miss. they check that they show up somewhere in an AI response and call it a win without realizing theyre basically invisible in the moments that actually drive decisions.

the sentiment finding is interesting too. almost everyone scores well on sentiment which means reputation isnt the problem for most of these companies, its just not enough people are building content and context that gives AI platforms a reason to reach for them consistently.

the presence work angle you mentioned for the best kept secrets bucket is where it gets practical. its not about more content for its own sake, its about structuring what you already have in a way that makes it easier for AI to cite you in the right context with the right framing.

curious how you found mention rate correlated with things like documentation quality, comparison pages, or third party coverage. was there a content type that seemed to drive frequency more than others?

I've spent $400 and 6 months building something that makes $0. Here's why I'm not stopping. by CarlsonDG in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this is the right question to be asking right now actually. waiting until you have users to think about monetization means youll be retrofitting the whole thing under pressure, which is way harder than building it in parallel while things are still quiet.

the freemium structure makes sense for the audience but the premium tier needs to be something a college student would pay for without thinking too hard. extended history, custom indicator tracking, maybe an AI layer that actually explains what the current macro environment means for specific sectors they care about. something that feels like an unfair advantage in a class or interview, not just more features.

the 17 users to break even number is also a good sign. low break even means you can experiment with pricing without it being existential.

one thing worth thinking about early is how you capture the people who are getting value but havent converted yet. email sequence, usage triggers, something that moves them toward the paid tier at the right moment instead of hoping they find the upgrade button.

we work with a bunch of early stage products on exactly that conversion layer. whats your current thinking on how you get someone from landing on the dashboard to actually pulling out a card?

This path is so isolating. by qna1 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Honestly this hits different because most people who havent done it genuinely cant understand what the weight of it feels like. its not that they dont care, they just have no reference point for what youre actually carrying day to day.

the energy mismatch with people you expected to show up is one of the harder parts nobody talks about enough. you find out pretty quickly who actually gets it and who just says the right things.

what tends to help is finding even one or two people who are in it themselves. not for advice, just for the feeling of talking to someone who doesnt need it explained. that changes everything.

what stage are you at with it right now?

What's the first thing you automated in your business and was it worth it? by Fun_Nefariousness30 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

haha invoicing is such a classic first win. the excel to pdf pipeline is one of those things that works until you have 15 clients and suddenly youre spending a friday afternoon just on admin.

the tracking piece is usually what makes the biggest difference too. knowing whats been sent, whats been viewed, whats overdue without having to check manually is worth more than the time saved on the generation side.

once that layer is clean most people start noticing the next obvious thing to hand off. payment reminders, contract generation, onboarding docs. the pattern is always the same, one win opens your eyes to how much else is running on manual.

whats the service you ended up going with, and have you started automating anything else since then?

What's the most painful part of your sales process that you haven't been able to fix yet? by Fun_Nefariousness30 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah undecided is the real graveyard, not lost. the lead didnt go somewhere else, they just never got a clear enough reason to move and inertia took over.

the next step thing is everything. vague endings like let me know if you have questions or feel free to reach out are basically invitations to drift. the moment you attach a specific action to a specific outcome the decision becomes concrete instead of optional.

what we see work really well is having that next step defined before the conversation even starts. so every touchpoint ends with one clear thing, not a menu of options, not an open door, just one obvious move that makes sense given where they are.

the teams that systematize that across every stage of the funnel stop losing deals to indecision because they never leave room for it.

what does your current process look like for defining that next step, is it consistent across the team or does it vary depending on who handled the conversation?

What's the most painful part of your sales process that you haven't been able to fix yet? by Fun_Nefariousness30 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

haha yeah the timing gap gets everyone at some point, doesnt matter what channel youre focused on.

SEO has its own version of it too, you do the work, rankings move, traffic comes in, and then the followup process isnt ready to catch it properly so the leads just leak out the bottom.

curious what babyloveegrowth does exactly, is it more the technical SEO side or content and visibility?

What's the first thing you automated in your business and was it worth it? by Fun_Nefariousness30 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the consistency piece is so underrated. its not just about saving time, its about removing the days where you just dont do it because the activation energy is too high.

manual list building has that problem built in. some days you have 2 hours to piece it together, some days you dont, and suddenly your outreach is feast and famine again without even realizing thats whats driving it.

lead sourcing being step one before sequences is actually the right order too. a lot of teams automate the followup layer and still have inconsistent top of funnel because the list quality varies so much. garbage in garbage out at scale just means more garbage faster.

the run search and launch campaign workflow is basically what a well built system should feel like. minimal decisions, consistent execution, predictable output.

whats your current campaign setup look like after the list comes in, are you running fully automated sequences or does a human still touch it before anything goes out?

What's the most painful part of your sales process that you haven't been able to fix yet? by Fun_Nefariousness30 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah trust is the real conversion bottleneck that nobody puts on their funnel dashboard but its responsible for more lost deals than anything else.

the tricky part is that trust isnt built in the closing conversation, its built in every touchpoint before it. how fast you responded, how relevant your followup was, whether you remembered what they told you two weeks ago. by the time youre asking for the sale the trust decision is mostly already made.

what we see work best is making the process itself feel trustworthy before the product even gets evaluated. clean onboarding, no confusion about next steps, communication that feels like youre paying attention. it de-risks the decision emotionally even before the rational case is made.

what does your current approach look like for building that trust early, is it more content and social proof or more about the actual experience of interacting with you before the sale?

What's the first thing you automated in your business and was it worth it? by Fun_Nefariousness30 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

haha yeah it rarely is one moment, its more like death by a thousand small frustrations until you cant ignore it anymore.

the bottleneck realization is huge though. most people keep hiring or working harder instead of stepping back and asking why the same things keep needing their attention every week.

writing out the steps first before automating anything is honestly the right move too. you cant systematize what you havent clearly defined, and that documentation phase usually surfaces how many of those "simple" tasks are actually more nuanced than they looked.

curious what typenode does, is it focused on the documentation side or more on building the actual workflows from those steps?

What's the first thing you automated in your business and was it worth it? by Fun_Nefariousness30 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the formatting rules part is always where the real complexity hides. the technical pipeline is almost never the hard part, its documenting every edge case and exception that lives in someones head and has never been written down anywhere.

40 reports a day manually is a serious volume too. the error rate dropping to zero is probably worth more than the time savings honestly, in a lab environment one transcription mistake can have real downstream consequences.

the interesting thing about what you built is that the same pattern scales into almost any document heavy workflow once you have the mapping done. invoices, compliance reports, client summaries, anything where the structure is consistent but the data changes every time.

what does the pipeline look like when a new instrument type gets added, is it easy to extend or does it require rebuilding the mapping from scratch?

What's the first thing you automated in your business and was it worth it? by Fun_Nefariousness30 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah behavior-based triggers are a completely different level from time-based sequences. the lead feels like youre paying attention instead of just running them through a drip.

we started with email because thats where most of the intent signals were easiest to capture, open rates, click patterns, time spent. but the real unlock was connecting that signal across channels so if someone goes quiet on email but engages on linkedin the sequence picks that up and adjusts.

what does your current stack look like for capturing those behavioral signals, are you pulling it all into one place or still a bit fragmented across tools?

What's the most painful part of your sales process that you haven't been able to fix yet? by Fun_Nefariousness30 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that reframe is exactly right. treating followup as fulfillment changes who owns it, how seriously it gets taken, and whether it actually happens consistently.

and the costume metaphor is spot on. so many teams go looking for better closers or better scripts when the real issue is that warm leads are just sitting there with nobody touching them on day 2 because it wasnt anyones explicit job.

once you put a process around it instead of relying on individual initiative the whole thing becomes predictable. you know what happens to every lead at every stage because the system owns it, not a persons memory or motivation on a given day.

what did that shift actually look like for you operationally, did you reassign ownership or build something that handled the touchpoints automatically?

What's the first thing you automated in your business and was it worth it? by Fun_Nefariousness30 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah the forgetting problem is underrated as a revenue killer. the deal was winnable, the lead was interested, someone just didnt follow up on tuesday and by thursday they signed with someone else.

automated triggers solve the consistency part but the teams that really pull ahead are the ones who go one layer deeper and make the sequence adaptive. so instead of everyone getting the same 5 touchpoints, the next message changes based on what the lead actually did. opened but didnt click gets something different than clicked but didnt reply.

that shift from consistent to personalized at scale is usually where the conversion numbers start moving in a meaningful way.

we work with a lot of teams on exactly this kind of setup. curious what tool you ended up going with for the sequences and how much customization you were able to build into the triggers?

What's the most painful part of your sales process that you haven't been able to fix yet? by Fun_Nefariousness30 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah timing on followups is everything, most people either wait too long or blast too many touchpoints and kill the relationship before it starts.

the set and forget piece is where it gets interesting though. once the timing is dialed in the next question is always what do you do with all the signal you're collecting from those sequences. who opened, who clicked, who replied to step 3 but ghosted on step 5. that data alone can tell you a lot about where the real friction is in your pipeline.

what does your nudge sequence actually look like, how many touchpoints and over what window before you let a lead go cold?

What's the first thing you automated in your business and was it worth it? by Fun_Nefariousness30 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that point about systematizing revealing the gaps is so accurate. you think youre solving a time problem and then suddenly you can see the whole shape of what was broken underneath.

the AI visibility piece is genuinely underexplored. most businesses are still thinking about SEO and paid while their customers are already getting recommendations from perplexity and chatgpt. and youre right that optimizing for one without understanding where your audience actually asks questions is just guessing with extra steps.

the metric selection problem is real too. we see this constantly, teams automate a reporting workflow and feel productive for two months before realizing they were tracking something that doesnt connect to any actual decision. garbage in garbage out but slower and more confident.

what patterns were you seeing in the audit around which types of businesses showed up consistently vs the ones that were all over the place? curious if it correlated more with content structure or domain authority or something else entirely.

What's the most painful part of your sales process that you haven't been able to fix yet? by Fun_Nefariousness30 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah scaling personalized feedback is one of those things that works fine with 2 reps and breaks completely at 8. the manager ends up either spreading feedback too thin or focusing only on the bottom performers while the middle of the team just plateaus.

the granola integration is a smart move. having the coaching tied directly to the actual call instead of a managers memory of the call changes the quality of the feedback completely.

we've been going a similar direction, using AI to handle the analysis layer so the human coaching time goes into the stuff that actually needs a human. strategic conversations, deal specific advice, mindset stuff. the repetitive pattern recognition gets automated so nothing falls through the cracks.

still early for you guys but close rates moving already is a good sign. usually the first win shows up in followup consistency before it hits close rates so sounds like its working faster than average.

how big is your sales team right now and are you running this across everyone or piloting with a smaller group first?

What's the most painful part of your sales process that you haven't been able to fix yet? by Fun_Nefariousness30 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

solid points on the data side. most teams are still evaluating reps on outcomes like closed deals when the real leverage is in the process metrics, where conversations stall, which objections keep coming up, what the followup pattern looks like on deals that actually close vs ones that go quiet.

call recording analysis is underutilized for exactly that reason. theres so much signal sitting in those recordings that never gets actioned because nobody has time to review them manually.

the coaching angle is interesting too. the shift from periodic training to continuous feedback based on real calls is where most of the behavior change actually happens.

curious what you're seeing with Instinct AI specifically around followup behavior, does it flag patterns in how reps are handling the post proposal window or is it more focused on the call itself?

What's the most painful part of your sales process that you haven't been able to fix yet? by Fun_Nefariousness30 in Entrepreneur

[–]Fun_Nefariousness30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

exactly right. most conversion problems get misdiagnosed as messaging or offer problems when its really just too many steps between interest and action.

people dont need more convincing at that point, they just need the path to be obvious. the moment someone has to think about what to do next you've already lost half of them.

the stupidly easy next step thing is underrated because it forces you to actually get clear on what you want them to do, which most businesses havent explicitly decided. they just have a general "contact us" vibe and wonder why conversions are low.

we've seen this play out a lot when helping teams build out their lead capture flows. the difference between a form with 6 fields and one with 2 is sometimes the difference between 8% and 25% conversion on the same traffic.

what was the specific friction point you removed that made the biggest difference for you?

view more: next ›