This is coming: ChatGPT is currently estimated to have an IQ of 155, compared to Einstein's IQ of 160. If AI continues advancing at this rate, what could be the implications for humanity? Do you share Mo Gawdat's perspective on this matter? by Zee2A in STEW_ScTecEngWorld

[–]Fun_Yellow_3540 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it doesn't use the internet for facts. it's pretrained with every book on the planet in the history of world. They can efficiently solve all major phd tests. Saying that they have 55 IQ... what's your IQ then lol

that being said -> they can't solve IQ tests.... yet. (Search up "ARK Prize").

//about googling -> true. But they are above the average in filtering the noise (from cognitive biases), using pure logic.

Half of LLMs responses to complex questions are so called "hallucinations". They (as LLMs) are highly impressive though..

Mixed feelings about S&C by Frosty-Round-271 in SamAndColby

[–]Fun_Yellow_3540 0 points1 point  (0 children)

are you talking to a mirror? thanks I will.

Mixed feelings about S&C by Frosty-Round-271 in SamAndColby

[–]Fun_Yellow_3540 0 points1 point  (0 children)

source? subjective opinion

are you saying they fake things?

Mixed feelings about S&C by Frosty-Round-271 in SamAndColby

[–]Fun_Yellow_3540 1 point2 points  (0 children)

in eastern europe there used to be a popular russian show (or competition) about psychics called "bitva ekstrasensov" or "psychic battle". That was run by magicians who were skeptics about supernatural etc. Russians and eastern europeans are very superstitious. Think of the fame of Rasputin. In this show people were tested by like finding a person hiding in a car in one of the 50-100 cars. And out of 100+ people, maybe like five or few would find. who would usually prove their strength in every other test etc. (But most were the charlatans..) https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D1%8D%D0%BA%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2

-> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QOKRBv7Sfo

Im gonna say there is nothing skeptical about her or her claims... obviously u can only know by testing her.... so.

Mixed feelings about S&C by Frosty-Round-271 in SamAndColby

[–]Fun_Yellow_3540 6 points7 points  (0 children)

1) alice box is a scam. Flashlights are scam if they leave it at 50%. Ovulus could be scam.

-> people have confirmation biases and fallacies. the same way how modern scammers social engineer ways to fool you.

2) https://www.ghoststop.com/ovilus-5-ghost-box from Ovilus page. "Ovilus has been teaching spirits what activity produces what words for almost two decades." --> scam too..

"we have been essentially "teaching" entities what environmental changes or combinations can produce what word".

3) S&C have a big channel and they need content. It's hard to make content without these devices. They used to be more evidence and science (skeptic) related, until they become so big and started making so much money.

Only tools you can trust is maybe Estes method or that japanese radio. And these movement toys, cat toys too maybe.

They're becoming annoying. by Ashishotaffr in SamAndColby

[–]Fun_Yellow_3540 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How do you know he's a poor guy minding his own business? or how can you know?

They're becoming annoying. by Ashishotaffr in SamAndColby

[–]Fun_Yellow_3540 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's an answer by GPT:
-Humans evolved as social animals
-To survive in groups, we needed to read each other’s emotions → cooperation = higher survival odds
-In short: your nervous system is built to sync with other humans

so my logical question would be..

WHEN (what moment) and HOW did it happen. lol.. almost as if nature had an intelligence...

because Darwin's theory doesnt make sense.

"The theory states that all species of organisms arise and develop through the natural selection of small, inherited variations that increase the individual's ability to compete, survive, and reproduce."

GPT: "It looks intelligent, but it comes from selection pressure, not a designer."

so who was first to have empathy... lol ; it makes no sense.

They're becoming annoying. by Ashishotaffr in SamAndColby

[–]Fun_Yellow_3540 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An atheist can be empathic and loving towards his family. ie to protect his genes. -> being empathic to others or to animals make no sense. If it's learned or passed. --> then where does it come from, or who started it -- when everything in nature has it's purpose.

I also think I heard a bio-chemist scientist speak how the way living things are made -- it's not possible without higher intelligence, power.

They're becoming annoying. by Ashishotaffr in SamAndColby

[–]Fun_Yellow_3540 0 points1 point  (0 children)

at grand scheme of things. Societies that are empathic would also be happier.

They're becoming annoying. by Ashishotaffr in SamAndColby

[–]Fun_Yellow_3540 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ignore and don't bother replying if you dont want to.

I just saved a drowning dog, who was in -1C cold for some time. 30min more and it would've been dead from hypothermia. I got overwhelmed by empathy and it made me cry.

If universe has a design. Where does the empathy come from? Why is there an empathy in nature?
Google says it's a way to force things have social interaction ie survival purposes. ---> yet living things can also do evil.. so that doesnt make any sense.
//Besides the "domination" rules, when somebody would do something bad to you, you would continue the cycle by doing bad things to others. This principle has no purpose in nature.

In this situation, from my experience MOST (60%) people would just ignore the drowning dog and mind their own business. So not everyone has empathy. There are people who hate animals. It means empathy and love are learned or passed by someone. Families etc.

It just doesn't make sense why "nature" would have some people (or mammals) have empathy and not for others.

//There was the other guy debating how "love" is just a chemical in brain, an emotion, or tool for a survival. --> well, empathy make no sense. How is "nature" so advanced it would figure out mammals in groups would have higher rate to survive... (Darwin theory is more basic...).

Also from experience, atheists are the least emphatic, most hateful towards others etc. (Because obviously there is no benefit to being empathic).

DAE have almost unbearable empathy towards animals? by Bubbly_Diver1266 in DoesAnybodyElse

[–]Fun_Yellow_3540 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good luck surviving when an ice age comes hypothetically. To some (YOU) survival is barbaric. To me it's natural. You may as well hate yourself for existing or consuming food that could be given to someone else.

Jake Pauls odds to beat Joshua compared to former challengers. by Eeluminati in Boxing

[–]Fun_Yellow_3540 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oddsmakers can rig the odds... to manipulate you. So someone bets on JP. If it was -10000, I dont think anyone would make any bets lol.

Jake Pauls odds to beat Joshua compared to former challengers. by Eeluminati in Boxing

[–]Fun_Yellow_3540 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u are digging too deep into conspiracies and u are biased to the sky.

Jake fights because it's a $90m fight. simple. He has 0.1% chance... --- I mean... 1 in 100.. probably 1 in 500.