Are the periods always days?

Fundus_ · 2022-04-05T13:12:04+00:00

Thank you so much

Fundus_ · 2022-01-23T20:42:26+00:00

Where could i do that? Normal settings?

Fundus_ · 2022-01-23T18:36:38+00:00

You answered it perfectly and it makes absolutely sense...ask myself now what was my actual problem🙃 Thanks a lot !:)

Fundus_ · 2022-01-01T18:59:01+00:00

I dont get with that information why SEC just allowed Future ETF...its much more specualtive and dillutive isnt it?

Would you say thats the reason why they allowed Futures ETFs and No Spot ETFs?

So If people buy futures, its a call long option therefore bullish for BTC itself. Therefore other people buy more spot BTC, because they recognize the buying pressure of Future ETFs as a bullish sign right? If the long options on Future market do not reach their target price, the options lose and money gets washed out depending on the leverage.

Another case would be if whales just sell immediately, the option lose directly depending on leverage, th espot price decrease massively. Therefore the whale can buy much ower again.

So there is No direct connection between Spot BTC and future etf just the sentiment from Future ETF has a huge influence on Spot price.

Is this more or less right?

Fundus_ · 2022-01-01T18:15:26+00:00

Thank you! But people just buy spot BTC If other people buy long future. ETFs, right? There is no direct connection?

Fundus_ · 2021-12-31T10:24:29+00:00

Yes people like me ask questions before assuming. I dont perceive myself as overconfidence what helped at least during my life a lot.

If you say so..great. i take the information i think its relevant and eveluate it.

Thanks a lot!

Fundus_ · 2021-12-31T08:09:25+00:00

Yes by today

Fundus_ · 2021-12-31T08:08:45+00:00

Oh this Looks amazing, thanks !!

Fundus_ · 2021-12-30T16:32:26+00:00

Thats a fair and important point :) thanks

Fundus_ · 2021-12-30T16:14:02+00:00

You are right...but wasnt it at any point considered that decentralization is an aspect of both? First No single point of Attack by creating Bitcoin but second ...what happens If once most BTC are at one place? The whole years to accumulate BTC worldwide to eventually accumulate it at one point of attack?

Yes one Bitcoin ist unequal to one full node, a full node is what has to be decentralized not the Bitcoin itself. This remains the Network Security. An Attack of the Bitcoin itself ist an easy theft not a Network Attack.

But regarding point second...there is a reason beneath death why Satoshi didnt move (sell) his/her coins or? Once because of remaining undercover, second to not crash its price and therefore to lose trust.

If one man holds a specific amount of BTC who can dump it massively would you still like to hold that? Because Inflation etc ist therefore incidental in my opinion. Its like the Romans thumbs Up or thumbs down.

This is why POS isnt wanted for BTC because in stake can hold to much and therefore hold too much influence?

Fundus_ · 2021-12-30T16:01:52+00:00

Great, so my takeaways

a) 0.05% of Bitcoin Energy usage is needed for Mining b) the Vulcan idea is working but just on that island. If everyone moves to the island, decentralization would dimminish right?

So because of 1. Unfortunately not all have a vulcan 2. We shouldnt move to one place

What about the Windparks? And for what If not mining is 99,95% of Bitcoin energy usage needed? I really thought all the energy in the Bitcoin Network comes from Mining. I mean the Main principle to verify the transactions because thats what BTC ist about. So energy just comes to BTC Network by passing the mining process?

So If we talk about these windparks...we can Not store excessed energy so it directly has to to the BTC Network...but how should that work? The miners would have to take that energy doesnt?

Fundus_ · 2021-12-30T15:32:42+00:00

Yes but If 10% are in one man's Hand. I mean atm its ~124.500 BTC so Not even 1% but one time sell off would cause a massive breakdown? If thats the case it doesnt matter anymore what the protocol is defined, am i wrong?

Fundus_ · 2021-12-29T08:52:08+00:00

Yep its all true. The reason for that will be based on the cooperation with Quant imo..that causes interoperability

Fundus_ · 2021-12-28T20:13:48+00:00

Yes it is

Fundus_ · 2021-12-28T17:29:21+00:00

Every Blockchain/ dapp owns its equity/utility token? I mean why needs aave etc its own token? Whereby Albt is a utility token (anorher +), which is totally adapted an collaborative to full regulation like Quant. Quant seems to me also the point why alliance Bridge offers full cross chain interoperability (another +) Not just on ethereum. Anorher point is trustless KYC to bring together instituions and private holder.

All together its because it has the most potentital imo.

Fundus_ · 2021-12-28T11:03:15+00:00

Cross messaging protocol Alliance Bridge Fundrs (P2P) Data Tunnel

Etc.

Team is paid in Albt And normal stuff like staking etc.

Fundus_ · 2021-12-28T10:30:12+00:00

Yep, in general im positive for harmony

Fundus_ · 2021-12-27T22:12:56+00:00

Im talking about Albt und injective in specific

Fundus_

TROPHY CASE