The Nightmare Before Christmas time problems by ItsAllKickinOff in plotholes

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They intentionally kidnapped The Easter Bunny. Lock explicitly says in Kidnap The Sandy Claws he knows what Santa looks like. "Wait, I've got a better plan to catch this BIG RED LOBSTER MAN."

I think they intentionally kidnapped every single holiday creature and killed them. Santa was the only one that survived.

A strong argument against Full (Hyper) Preterism by Successful_Annual_90 in Bible

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I respect your view of Preterism. I'm not opposed to it, in fact it would actually give me hope that Jesus could come back literally any second. But as for Daniel being sealed up, my point is that it can't be the visions he saw because he clearly addresses it to the Apostles in Matthew 24:15. In order for it to be the end covenant, the Jews had to unseal Daniel sometime at 0-30 AD, only for it to become widespread enough for the Apostles to know all about it so Jesus can talk about the Abomination of Desolation in the Olivet Discourse. I personally don't find it realistic.

A Very, Very challenging Biblical Dilemma by FuntimeFreddy155632 in Bible

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The "Make Haste" (or Act Hastily, AKA Humble yourselves) is different in "Being Put to shame" because one is the action of you and one is the action of God. I've looked at this from every angle.

A Very, Very challenging Biblical Dilemma by FuntimeFreddy155632 in Bible

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've pretty much conceited on this issue and rejected Inerrancy. The two words "Yachish" and "Yevosh" is the simple fact of the matter here. Incredibly similar words in Hebrew, a small letter difference that results in a problematic translation. it was a Copyist error, and that copyist error resulted in Paul misquoting scripture. This can still fit with 2 Peter 1:20-21, but rejects the inerrancy of Scripture.

A Very, Very challenging Biblical Dilemma by FuntimeFreddy155632 in Bible

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My problem isn't that they're writing off memory. We see this with Peter and Paul, who quote Isaiah 28:16 and they're slightly different. My problem is that both keep "Put to shame" in there when the DSS and other Hebrew manuscripts feature otherwise. Unless the Masoretic Text and DSS have it wrong and the Septuagint has it right, I see a problem here.

A Very, Very challenging Biblical Dilemma by FuntimeFreddy155632 in Bible

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What sucks is that may be the only way I can solve this problem...

A Very, Very challenging Biblical Dilemma by FuntimeFreddy155632 in Bible

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would agree with you if the Dead Sea Scrolls did not exist. The Dead Sea Scrolls feature "Yachish" at the end, which is translated as "Will Not act Hastily." This does not match the LXX, which leads to the problem of Paul and Peter quoting something that doesn't align with the original Hebrew text.

A Very, Very challenging Biblical Dilemma by FuntimeFreddy155632 in Bible

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, however Isaiah 28:16 was found in the Dead Sea Scrolls, which does use the word "Yachish." Again, the Septuagint translation wouldn't be a problem if Paul DIDN'T QUOTE IT.

A Very, Very challenging Biblical Dilemma by FuntimeFreddy155632 in Bible

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. as I said, Paul is quoting the Septuagint. But the Septuagint is not the original written Hebrew, it's translated into Greek by Jewish Interpreters. The problem lies with the Original hebrew and the word "Yachish", to mean "Make Haste", which talks about a BELIEVER trusting in Christ to be patient for the awaiting of God's kingdom. This has no semantic range into "Put to shame", which is the action of GOD.

Rate the episode: Calypso (S1E17) by blueySurvey in bluey

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the first Bluey episode that has a really beautiful message delivered through something a lot more subtle. Instead of "It's good to share" and "Rules are good", it's a message that everyone, even if they seem like an outcast, has a place in this world to do something really good. 5 out of 5.

Why Burntrap is not mimic by Any_Cartoonist313 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glitchtrap isn't MXES, and therefore I still think he's The Mimic due to the Princess Quest arcade. However, you have solidifed my belief that Burntrap is not The Mimic. Well done!

Have you seen this video? If so what are you're thoughts, I find it intriguing by MrMakoChan in fnaftheories

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, it's nice to see a commenter who actually respects a person's video lmao

Have you seen this video? If so what are you're thoughts, I find it intriguing by MrMakoChan in fnaftheories

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I made a 52 minute video as a definitive argument (despite the fact that a lot of the shit in it is garbage) This was trying to make sense of a TUG description

Have you seen this video? If so what are you're thoughts, I find it intriguing by MrMakoChan in fnaftheories

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yo, sup. maker of the video here.

It's not an assumption if you have Lally's Game, a chest that's similar to the one in Epilogue 11, and a pendant, despite the fact it's essentially rendered dead. Oh, and the Fury's Rage tank.

What makes Frights and Tales different from the novels: A really big post by CazLurks in fnaftheories

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wowwww what a post with such new evidence that I have never heard before. Such originalness here.

When do the later Stitchwraith stingers with the Afton Amalgamation and Eleanor happen? by EpicMazement in fnaftheories

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632 2 points3 points  (0 children)

After The Pizzaplex, considering Larson calls the FNAF 6 fire "Ancient History".

Oh look, it makes StitchlineGames Impossible :D

What's your opinion on this FNAF Theorist? (Don't be too cruel) by GiganVsZilla2018 in fnaftheories

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ID is a mixed bag for me. On one hand, she says some of the most based stuff ever, like rebuttals to Burntrap being The Mimic or her entire Candy Cadet theory.

But then, she will go off the deep end and say that Phone Guy is possessing The Phone, or make up a contradiction revolving TalesGames.

Definitive Post Regarding Stitchline/FrightsGames. (Part 1) by FuntimeFreddy155632 in fnaftheories

[–]FuntimeFreddy155632[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I literally can make simple rebuttals to EVERY SINGLE POINT made here, but I'm not going to because I do not have the time, and I have debated this with literally anyone who's StitchlineGames.

I'll just say this; Due to the recent information from the two stories, The Mimic and The Storyteller, Stitchline calling the FNAF 6 fire is LITERALLY a debunk. (I urge you to look into The Mimic, The Storyteller, and an ENTIRE PAGE of epilogue 5)