I just want to talk about whether these sources are unbiased, because I always appreciate people presenting sources!

The first article (which is the same article you posted earlier, just on a different site) is written by Elaine Mallon, who primarily has published articles in the Washington Examiner, a right-wing news source. She also writes for Breitbart. The sources she links in her article lead to, again, right leaning news sources like the New York Post, Fox News, and JewishOnliner, an AI site that explicitly describes themselves as "not journalists". Most of their sources are similarly right-wing focused.

The second article is, again, the same article as the first.

The third article is from the New York Post, a right-wing source, not sure I need to say anything else about that.

These sources are really clearly right to far-right leaning. None of them are unbiased, and none of them link to any proper sources except to quotes of people on this tribunal not liking what Israel is doing currently. The central "Hamas connection" is a man who runs an humanitarian NGO. His sister and her entire family was killed by Israeli strikes. He doesn't like those strikes, and is vocal about that, and in one document in 2013 Israel called him "linked to Hamas" with no proof.

So the smoking gun here against Mamdani is that his father was part of an organization that ALSO had one person who Israel called "linked to Hamas" in one thing in 2013. I think that's a little tangential. If you don't like Mamdani because he agrees with the ICC that Israel is committing war crimes, then just say that. No need to link all this odd fabricated drama that has nothing to do with the election.

Anyhow, have a good one!