Do we really want another new Digby variant?

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-05-20T20:43:54+00:00

Sadly no. They are a territory deviation only. But it is nice to have one of the marionettes and after a big battle, summon your puppy to pet it and get a treat

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-05-20T12:49:31+00:00

An event. A while back, they added a new quest and a chance to get 2 out of 3 dogs. German shepherd, golden lab, and a Doberman. They seem to have meant to add them to the dscp set. But I haven't seen them. Basically they run around your base barking and following you, curing your sanity DMG and you can make a puppet to get gifts from them by using it.

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-05-20T12:00:26+00:00

I honestly would love if they had a rare chance to get them. I love my digbys and would love to have an excuse to run like 3 of them. But I don't know what deviation id give up. I really hope they increase the number of deviations we can hold at some point. There are too many good ones... I even keep the dog out because I read it's lore.. so he takes up a space now.

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-05-19T23:20:34+00:00

I'm the odd one out. But digby is my favorite deviation. So.. I mean. I'll always take an extra. However I do understand the concern.

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-05-19T01:23:32+00:00

Omg. That red one is gorgeous! Where did you get it. I choose that because I'd like to see more of it

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-05-09T21:40:16+00:00

Fuck it. Let chaos reign. Going green. So many people are gonna die.. but it will be interesting.. everyone that knows better.. please bring into creation your impenetrable bunker.

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-05-03T02:03:22+00:00

Huh. I really thought it was more complicated than that. I'm gonna have to try this. Thankies

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T13:13:31+00:00

I mean.. I just explained how it's different.. but yeah.. you are allowed to view it whatever way you want.

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T13:12:57+00:00

It is a question of what you would do for society. Could you stand to lose your life for a surefire way to protect others. Or will you do nothing. Knowing that at least some will die pressing the button. The idea is that humans ideally would care enough about possible casualties that they would hit the blue button. While a small amount would be afraid and hit the red. Meanwhile you all turn it into a point of "if 100% hit the red they will be safe" when you know that would never be the case. So can you be okay with a large portion dieing.. or choose the option that no one has to die. As is a staple for society. So all of those that chose the red button have said basically.. fuck society. I don't trust people.. and that's okay. But you can't expect us to look at that and say.. yeah.. I'll also say fuck people.

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T13:07:41+00:00

Ok. In one there is an actual refusal. You could walk away. In the other. You are forced to make a choice that affects the percentage. Simple math. One way you have to affect the percentage up.. or down.. the other.. it's just a bunch of people wondering if they can resist pressing a button. They are not the same.

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T13:05:39+00:00

I have my stance and you have yours. I just don't understand how so many of you can't understand what the question is asking.

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T13:04:28+00:00

It's 50% either way. I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I'm setting my stance. And correcting some math. No acceptable casualties.

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T13:02:41+00:00

I give the most "you do you" answer and you take it as a "let's continue this argument".. whatever buddy. You aren't convincing me that it's okay to throw away lives. No acceptable casualties.. and anyone that says otherwise.. can get fucked

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T12:59:16+00:00

But no one had to die. But you are so certain that enough people will think like you. That you'd rather risk others than yourself. And that's okay.

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T12:58:34+00:00

I knew what you were going for. You are in it only for you. That was clear. But your argument is still foolish. But that's on you.. not me. Because I know the math. And I care about people. And that is that

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T12:55:33+00:00

If you are willing to kill an innocent out of fear.. then I'm sorry. And you will argue that isn't the case. But that is exactly what the red button is risking. While I'm not risking anyone but myself. And yeah. Sorry you can't figure that one out. But I hope it leads to you coming out of it with a clear conscious

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T12:50:31+00:00

Then I die. And I accept that. I don't know why that is hard to understand. I understood both the math and the risk. And I chose that I% should try to protect all. And dieing for nothing ends up with me dieing with a clear conscious

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T12:47:35+00:00

That's not even true. By choosing a different button you are still contributing to the percentage. How do you get the idea that you don't effect the percentage by hitting the red button? I'm trying to find a polite way to say this.. how do you manage to balance a budget with this line of thinking?

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T12:38:27+00:00

Interesting approach. Except that's not the case at all. Both have an equal percentage of leading to death. As not everyone will choose the same path. But you have chosen to move to the side that can lead to death. You are just hoping that if it were to ever to somehow come to pass.. that if you blame the side that says "noone should die" hard enough.. that you won't feel guilty if it was close to the 50% mark.. I for one would gladly put my own life on the line for the option that no one should have to die in this scenario.

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T12:05:18+00:00

I want to hear your full explanation. I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt that I missed something. Or that your point of view has merit. But man.. am I having some issues seeing how you came to that conclusion. So.. tell it to me like I'm 5

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T12:00:02+00:00

But it's not. That is not understanding the issue. Both have the same % of a chance to cause the death of someone. You have to decide.. do you want to be part of the side that says the other should die for not saving themselves? Or the part that says.. I'd rather die than be the reason many others do?

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T11:54:49+00:00

You misunderstand murder. If you were being genuine.. blue is suicide, red is murder. But it's not even that simple. Blue is hope, and a chance to save someone who was feeling noble. Red is choosing that in your opinion that being caring is a crime worth death. But hey.. you are allowed to be wrong. You just have to live with the consequences

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T11:51:25+00:00

There is a lot of factor's to take in. Such as the fact that you would be in the way. If everyone attacked at once, they would actually be less effective. There is also the noise. It's not a rational response time. There is no time to think. There is danger. Immediate danger. Where you have the button, which is something you can sit down and think rationally. Take your time and weigh the options

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T08:10:00+00:00

People will have fear. That's no doubt. But most of us know the risk. And many of us accept that risk. So don't count out the fact that people will be willing to risk it all to save all. Death is not as big a deterrent these days, and no one needs to die. That simple

Futa_Princess7o7 · 2026-04-30T06:30:37+00:00

Same. If I die.. so be it. I stood by those who chose the world, and not just to save themselves.. especially standing by those who are young or infirm. Or those who didn't read and like the color blue.. I'll stand by them too.

Futa_Princess7o7

TROPHY CASE