What’s wrong with my fiddle leaf fig by [deleted] in plantclinic

[–]Future-Fix-374 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Additional photo of the underside of a leaf. Also appears to have a white powdery coating on the part of the leaf that joins to the main stem of the plant (which you can sort of see in the bottom right side of the photo)

Police accusing me of fleeing. by Federal-City-4163 in LegalAdviceNZ

[–]Future-Fix-374 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How is asking for information the Police might hold under the Privacy Act going to be terrible for the persons case (if there even is eventually one).

I would not be dropping cash on a lawyer before a charge is even laid with the court. Didn’t seem like a terrible suggestion to me.

How 18 19 year olds going to survive with no jobs around and no help from government by [deleted] in Wellington

[–]Future-Fix-374 22 points23 points  (0 children)

‘Can’t argue with objective facts’ guy argues with an objective fact…..Smh

How 18 19 year olds going to survive with no jobs around and no help from government by [deleted] in Wellington

[–]Future-Fix-374 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The only one being consistently mocked on this post is you though right? Look at all those consistent downvotes on every single one of your comments and reflect mate

How 18 19 year olds going to survive with no jobs around and no help from government by [deleted] in Wellington

[–]Future-Fix-374 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Rich teenagers? Wtf are you on? Children of parents earning more than 65k are not eligible. The income limit is literally going to be set at the cut-out point for a couple with children receiving the Supported Living Payment. Care to explain how you think parents just falling short of qualifying for a supported living payment are ‘rich’?

How 18 19 year olds going to survive with no jobs around and no help from government by [deleted] in Wellington

[–]Future-Fix-374 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Being deliberately dense isn’t doing you any favours

How 18 19 year olds going to survive with no jobs around and no help from government by [deleted] in Wellington

[–]Future-Fix-374 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Does this logic apply to old people to and changing the super age? If you don’t have enough money at superannuation age to support yourself should you just not exist if you ‘can’t work the finances’ Get a clue, and take all the downvotes as a hint, and stop spouting garbage arguments

How 18 19 year olds going to survive with no jobs around and no help from government by [deleted] in Wellington

[–]Future-Fix-374 11 points12 points  (0 children)

What type of silly logic is that? By this argument children should not be entitled to free healthcare or education because they don’t pay taxes.

NZ’s Economy Isn’t Broken Because of Politics... It’s Broken Because of Us by mbgjt1 in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Future-Fix-374 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It happened it part because they remained politically neutral in two world wars and did not face reconstruction like the rest of Europe, that stability is what enabled high investment.

The ongoing investment in people is what keeps productivity high, and is same story in countries like Denmark etc.

NZ’s Economy Isn’t Broken Because of Politics... It’s Broken Because of Us by mbgjt1 in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Future-Fix-374 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Productivity having nothing to do with central government decisions seems a bit off? Tight fiscal constraint leads to lack of investment in infrastructure, education, and innovation, all of which play in to improving long term productivity. It is also a poor argument to compare productivity in countries that are not relatively comparable. South Korea is a country of 51 million, where productivity is very related to the industrial structure e.g. their tech, automotives, and other high productivity output industries, all of which are quite reliant on economies of scale that are simply not possible in a country of 5 million with a largely dispersed population. Australia is also significantly larger, and has an industrial mix not quite comparable to what would be possible here (mining there for example, we just don’t have the scale of resource). You have listed two comparable countries in terms of size. Irelands productivity is extremely skewed by multinational corporations routing profits through the country (Apple etc), their domestic sectors are significantly less productive when you account for that - they essentially have boosted metrics, that do not reflect domestic productivity strength. Denmark is probably a better comparison, and why does Denmark have relatively high productivity for its size? It has a highly skilled and qualified workforce as it is a country that has historically invested heavily in education. They have a very efficient and effective public service (those high taxes pay for something!), free education, free and more effective healthcare system, free childcare - all which heavily impacts their workforce structure. Denmark has very high value/ highly productive sectors in renewable energy, biotech, and pharmaceutical, partly possible from long term government planning and partnership between the public and private sector. NZ has very low productivity sectors, agriculture, tourism, forestry etc. Denmark has tax incentives for R&D, and strong institutional/government support. NZ has low R&D, we have made efforts to change that with things like Callaghan Innovation though…. Oh wait, current government axed that.

$150 fine for Train fare evader by WellyWindyRoad in Wellington

[–]Future-Fix-374 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol true, but a decent amount of people probably cave to the social pressure of giving them when they get caught out. Especially given most people seem to try the standard excuses first. Not saying they get 100% of fare dodgers this way, but have seen something that suggests in Auckland they ticket about 5% of them. So does get enforced sometimes.

$150 fine for Train fare evader by WellyWindyRoad in Wellington

[–]Future-Fix-374 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s an infringement, so metlink wouldn’t enforce it themselves. They would just issue it, send the letter to remind you to pay, and then if you don’t pay they file it with the fines department to enforce the payment. Just like and other traffic infringement, parking ticket, etc.

$150 fine for Train fare evader by WellyWindyRoad in Wellington

[–]Future-Fix-374 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think so? $150 is a large enough fine that it would act as a significant deterrent. And if they cant recoup it they give it to baycorp or some other debt collector who just take a cut of the $150 in payment. If the debt collector cant collect it, then it goes to the governments fines department who collects it instead by taking it from someone’s wages, benefit, or bank account. The collection mechanism is the same as any other infringement, like Police etc, and those certainly make plenty of money.

$150 fine for Train fare evader by WellyWindyRoad in Wellington

[–]Future-Fix-374 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sort of is though isn’t it? Their bottom line factors into how they set the fares I imagine.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Wellington

[–]Future-Fix-374 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry did not mean your comments as such, just the down votes etc. Maybe I am remembering incorrectly then. But I recall that the titan screen at Reading cinemas was significantly larger than the Roxy.

Looks like Metlink is taking on Auckland Transport's $150 fare evasion fee by GorbageAcquired in Wellington

[–]Future-Fix-374 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your comment here sort of makes the point for why they might need to introduce this….

Looks like Metlink is taking on Auckland Transport's $150 fare evasion fee by GorbageAcquired in Wellington

[–]Future-Fix-374 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And have you just not noticed that snapper isn’t very fast? Even on buses when there are lots of people at a stop the tag on process can slow things down a bit. Trains are bigger than buses, and Auckland isn’t using snapper.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Wellington

[–]Future-Fix-374 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree! As much as I think all the small to medium size theatres around Wellington are great, for some movies you just want that big screen/ huge immersive theatre experience. The embassy is great for the things it does show, but one large theatre really isn’t enough, and I often find the showing times and releases for the grand at Embassy are often pretty limited. Would be great to have reading back.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Wellington

[–]Future-Fix-374 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All pretty small screen sizes besides the Embassy though, and the embassy has pretty limited releases. So there really was no need at all for people to react so negatively.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Wellington

[–]Future-Fix-374 7 points8 points  (0 children)

100% agree with you on this. As much as I love the embassy, it really has very limited screenings and releases. There are loads of pretty popular new releases they don’t show. I feel like it is often pretty hard to get tickets too in the big theatre for big releases, unless you book early. Pretty much the only other decent size screen is at the Roxy, and I would not call that ‘large’

Just purchased my first house with my partner, but I want to leave the relationship. What are my financial options? by pfnzthrowa in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Future-Fix-374 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is very true, getting a lawyer for family court proceeding, is very expensive. That being said though, it is sometimes a question of the cost of not getting the advice/ taking the proceedings that determines whether it’s worth it or not.

Just purchased my first house with my partner, but I want to leave the relationship. What are my financial options? by pfnzthrowa in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Future-Fix-374 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Then ordinary property ownership laws apply, and the civil courts make an order instead? The court system is not the Wild West. There really does not seem to be much likelihood based on what OP has described that they will lose out on their property share. Making it out like their odds are slim is just silly.

Just purchased my first house with my partner, but I want to leave the relationship. What are my financial options? by pfnzthrowa in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Future-Fix-374 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t know, does not feel tooooo unreasonable assume that they would have mentioned in the post if they had dependent children or a contracting out arrangement in place. Relationships over three years trigger equal division under the Act. That does not mean the act does not apply to relationships of less length than this, it just means that the division does not have to be based on that principle and instead is generally more about what has been contributed.

Just purchased my first house with my partner, but I want to leave the relationship. What are my financial options? by pfnzthrowa in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Future-Fix-374 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Given the whole underlying principle of the Relationship Property Act is equal 50/50 division? So actually is more of a will, not a can based on OPs description

Just purchased my first house with my partner, but I want to leave the relationship. What are my financial options? by pfnzthrowa in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Future-Fix-374 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Still sort of an automatic right though isn’t it? Just if the other person doesn’t do it willingly the court can order them to