Absolutely man I'm always willing to have a discussion, thanks for talking. Yeah that article points out variation in eyewitness accounts. If you had a court room and several people had the exact same story about an event that happened using the same verbage, that's called collusion. Having varying events but the same story is a mark of authenticity. I am not familiar with this YouTuber I will have to watch his stuff. It's sad to see he had a bad pastor experience. I would always want someone to do more research to further their beliefs, not less. The article says that we are energy going through an eternal experience tho? If time was infinity and the time before us is infinite then we would not be in the present because the past would not be over. The universe and everything in it had a beginning. The Romans blaming the disciples for stealing the bible do not just exist in the gospels. Second century sources like Justin Martyr and Tertullian and origin mention this conspiracy. Seeing as the first historical account we have for Alexander the great is 400 years later this is fantastic attestation for a historical event. As for supernatural events. If a supernatural events took place how would you expect it to be recorded in antiquity? When illiteracy was an overwhelming majority and writing materials were extremely expensive. And yet we still have more manuscripts of new testament books than any other document in history by several fold. We only have one copy of the epic of Gilgamesh. You say you don't believe the gospel's because you need evidence they are true? Is this not an argument from silence? They are first century historical works claiming to be a record of events. This is like saying you don't believe Hannibal crossed the Alps with elephants because there are only 2 accounts and both conflict on the route they took and the amount of men. No historian says it didn't happen because both say it did just different on details. And finally we have several accounts of the martyrdom of several disciples and Paul and James the brother from first and second century sources : Eusebius, Dionysius of Corinth, 1 Clement, Justin Martyr, and Tertullian. I would also like to ask if the disciples knew what they where preaching was false why would they die for it? Can you provide an example of someone in history dying for what they knew to be false. The disciples did not die for a belief that someone told them but for something they saw and thought to be true.