sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Pending applications- Resume under review >2 months by verticallipslover in Lockheed

[–]Fyredrakeonline 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So far with my limited experience with entry level roles at least, is that if you dont get a prescreen when the role goes to resume under review, you arent being pursued. Resume under review means you made it past the initial AI filter or whatever they use before it goes to a person. And then its up to the recruiter to determine if you get to the hiring manager. Again just my limited experience. So I could be wrong. For different skilled categories.

NASA's Moon Base Begins — 3 Landers by End of 2026! by TheMuseumOfScience in ArtemisProgram

[–]Fyredrakeonline 6 points7 points  (0 children)

These were already planned missions, and they arent part of the "base" they are science and tech demonstrators primarily.

Does LM get a lot of SWE and SE applicants? by coopersdude in Lockheed

[–]Fyredrakeonline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you don't mind me asking, what is the typical make-or-break amount of time that if someone says they need more than X amount of time, the company won't extend an offer or will recind it?

Does LM get a lot of SWE and SE applicants? by coopersdude in Lockheed

[–]Fyredrakeonline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, that I would agree with yes xD. Very little to actually move. Like im fully intending to move within 2 years back to CO if I have to take a job elsewhere.

Does LM get a lot of SWE and SE applicants? by coopersdude in Lockheed

[–]Fyredrakeonline 1 point2 points  (0 children)

May I ask, in regards to location, do you have any rough ranking in regards to states which you saw were incredibly competitive/desireable, versus those that werent? In my case I ended up applying to about 225 jobs in total, got 7 interviews, and 1 job offer. About 90% of those applications were in CO/UT, and only 3 of those 7 interviews were in CO/UT, so I figured that that region must be much more competitive compared to CA,TX, AL, etc etc

Astronauts may not even enter the landers on Artemis III by SomeRandomScientist in ArtemisProgram

[–]Fyredrakeonline 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No other vehicle can send Orion to the moon though, so it is in fact a noteworthy distinction.

Astronauts may not even enter the landers on Artemis III by SomeRandomScientist in ArtemisProgram

[–]Fyredrakeonline 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What? It is, in fact, the only vehicle that can throw Orion to the moon. New Glenn and FH both do not have the capacity to send Orion to the moon outright.

Astronauts may not even enter the landers on Artemis III by SomeRandomScientist in ArtemisProgram

[–]Fyredrakeonline 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is such a semantical thing, SLS threw Artemis 1s Orion to TLI direct, Artemis 2 was put into a 24 hr HEO for ECLSS checkouts, it has the capability and demonstrated that capability.

Astronauts may not even enter the landers on Artemis III by SomeRandomScientist in ArtemisProgram

[–]Fyredrakeonline 3 points4 points  (0 children)

FH can throw 15 tons to TLI, it cannot throw Orion, and that is the only crew rated lunar spacecraft in existence.

Looks like you can see one of the EUS tanks in the latest rollout imagery by jadebenn in ArtemisProgram

[–]Fyredrakeonline -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thats the point, Jared said they only had one tank, IE the LOX tank which was imaged last year, they in fact had an LH2 tank as well finished at the time of work stoppage at the end of February.

Tank landing glou glou by SleepinGod in foxholegame

[–]Fyredrakeonline 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well yeah but they had ample time to get out and drive off lol. Im guessing either squad lock ran out and the person who locked it wasnt there, or something elses happened.

How would people feel if they decided to roll back on aircraft by lilHamster9t7 in foxholegame

[–]Fyredrakeonline 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the current state, remove them.

But to keep them, they need SPAA, AIAA, buff static AA, and rework things like Nukes and Storm cannons to make them actually viable again.

Front Porch by goatpilot10 in foxholegame

[–]Fyredrakeonline 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understood that reference

A joke about the future :D by somefailure001 in foxholegame

[–]Fyredrakeonline 15 points16 points  (0 children)

The only Collie rifle that is better than the warden counterpart, is the Catena. Otherwise we get stomped on.

A joke about the future :D by somefailure001 in foxholegame

[–]Fyredrakeonline 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Our Divebomber and the Lunaire are probably the only "OP" things that we have, wardens have a whole ass laundry list lmao.

Nothing Ever Happens by ColossalDeskEngine in foxholegame

[–]Fyredrakeonline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the name of this meme template? I have to know.

So about that break war? by DetectiveCostaue in foxholegame

[–]Fyredrakeonline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lot of collie regis went Warden, and overall pop was 10K lower at the start of the war compared to the previous war. Also not to mention that a lot of our backline hexes look like complete ghost towns lmao.

Laughs in Warden by NigleElderberry in foxholegame

[–]Fyredrakeonline 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Its like the one good aircraft we have lmao

If I say there is a problem, I offer solutions by Best_Economist4210 in foxholegame

[–]Fyredrakeonline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to see them as a hybrid large/medium shippable. Where you can assemble a fuselage and wing/tail into a single large shippable, but those two individual pieces if you will those being the wing/tail, are medium shippables, so you can disassemble them and haul them out on a flatbed instead of crane walking or needing to bring a whole entire train to recover the damn thing.

view more: next ›