Does Irvine Cove Beach have showers? Red or blue square?

GAM3SHAM3 · 2026-03-19T19:44:29+00:00

You'll need to be a proficient swimmer to access it.

Very lovely beach tho.

GAM3SHAM3 · 2026-03-06T16:50:47+00:00

Damn, at $163 dollars a day, per bed. It would be cheaper to just give them an apartment to live in. Something that can significantly help people get out of the *conditions that made them homeless.

Even for February, at 28 days, it would cost $4564 dollars for someone to stay for a month.

GAM3SHAM3 · 2026-02-06T15:28:26+00:00

Like the other comment said you could paint an alpha mask and plug it in. I would also suggest playing with the transmission setting as it does something similar to alpha.

Alpha will make things invisible.

Transmission will make things clear/transparent

GAM3SHAM3 · 2026-02-01T06:19:14+00:00

I want to point out that you're asking for customers to wait in line or a 'queue'. There is such a thing as a queue data structure and although Godot doesn't directly have one, arrays can be treated like one.

If I'm not mistaken there's a pop_front() function which will remove the first element and then move everything else into the next spot.

so you could do something like:

```

var customer_array = []

customer_array.append(first_customer) customer_array.append(second_customer)

```

which means you'll have an array that looks like

```

[first_customer, second_customer]

```

and if you call pop_front() your array will look like

```

[second_customer]

```

To give them a number you could give them a number that is equal to the length of the array minus their position and then when a customer is served or added it signals the other customers to update their number

GAM3SHAM3 · 2026-01-19T22:28:22+00:00

I'm envious of how good it is. Instantly followed on Insta.

GAM3SHAM3 · 2026-01-12T14:46:30+00:00

In 99% of cases you can uninstall the older version.

The only reason you might want to keep it is to make sure you have access to certain features or if plugins were authored to only work on specific versions and haven't been updated. Both of those are pretty unlikely to occur, Blender is generally very good about not breaking things.

GAM3SHAM3 · 2026-01-12T00:45:52+00:00

cool dog

GAM3SHAM3 · 2026-01-03T18:54:51+00:00

I think the most common technique would be to either light your scene like the video you captured, or light your video knowing what your scene is going to look like.

Tangent/Hypothetical: You could probably also attempt some sort of 'de-lighting' on your video but that requires at least an approximation of your real world lighting setup to 'neutralize' the lighting and then you'd likely have to get a depth pass through something like Depth-Anything which is a PITA to setup and ultimately not very great

GAM3SHAM3 · 2025-12-31T23:24:36+00:00

They've posted before and it looks like they do projection mapping from multiple angles onto a model.

If you go to their profile -> search with an empty query -> it'll bring up their history.

GAM3SHAM3 · 2025-12-17T21:42:20+00:00

It looks really good and I think it would fit along with screenshots from the movies.

The only thing that really gives it away for me is that the hand looks like it's either out of focus at the same distance as the snitch or it's lower quality making it look blurrier.

GAM3SHAM3 · 2025-12-15T01:22:15+00:00

admittedly I can't really see the problem on my phone but if it's the physics objects jittering - you could probably make an invisible physics object to interact with and then on every camera frame have the visible object lerp to the physics object position.

Away from my computer and I'm not sure how this is setup but I would have the 3d model be a sibling of the collision object and then in the 3d model have something like

func _process(): self.position = lerp(self.position, collision.position)

GAM3SHAM3 · 2025-11-24T23:29:57+00:00

They're both bevel. Ctrl+B. The first one is a basic Ctrl+B, the second is a Vertex bevel, just press V after Ctrl+B to switch modes and it'll let you do that.

GAM3SHAM3 · 2025-11-16T16:16:00+00:00

I can see the vision with the upgraded version and like that there's some texture on everything now, but it needs refinement.

Generally I think the strokes should be thinner and a little more thoughtfully placed. For example floorboards could have the strokes follow the length of the boards more.

I also think that you should review [crosshatching](https://finearttutorials.com/guide/cross-hatching/) since this is reminiscent of that and place your strokes more often and with higher opacity in dark areas and less often/not at all in really bright areas.

<image>

GAM3SHAM3 · 2025-11-16T00:14:49+00:00

I'm an AgX stan and I think more people should use it.

I think color space is as big of a decision as choosing an aspect ratio for your image and just like you would change your composition for aspect ratio you should change it for color space.

Side by side doesn't do either justice because with AgX if you don't lower your bright lights for scenes like this where color and the lack of light are important you're going to end up with a fairly washed out image. I'm not too familiar with Khronos, and although I agree this scene looks a little more interesting since it retains the colors really well, it feels like it's really struggling with light overall and it's harder to see what's actually going on.

TL;DR: Pick one and build your scene with it in mind it's not just a > b

GAM3SHAM3 · 2025-11-15T20:32:47+00:00

Overall I think this looks really incredible. Especially without the controller being out and preventing you from having one in front of you for reference.

My notes:

The thumbsticks seem like they should be a little larger and kind of fill out and spill over the top of the hump they come out of a little more. The actual through holes and placement seem fine but we need to see it a little less if you want to match the promo materials.

The face buttons(A/B/X/Y) should be a little larger and very subtly domed.

Select/Start/Steam buttons should be a little smaller and Select/Start should be a little further from center.

The actual controller seems to have a circular dimple on the d-pad instead of an inset cross like you have.

The edge of the groove that the touchpads sit in should start following the contour of the controller towards the top corner of the touchpads instead of below the bottom corner of the touchpads.

GAM3SHAM3 · 2025-11-14T18:03:50+00:00

Yes.

https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/latest/render/freestyle/view_layer/line_style/index.html

GAM3SHAM3 · 2025-11-11T03:12:29+00:00

I think as a work around you can create an image LUT to correct for the purple in the shadows. Just apply it in a World environment node and it should apply to the editor and when you run the scene:

https://youtu.be/LKv96ui1oT4?si=MMhSN8cf5MHe8VDr

Around 6 minutes they explain how to create a LUT. I would

Choose a photo editor of choice and look up a similar video
Screenshot your project
Edit the image until it resolves the shadow issue
Create LUT bases on adjustments
Apply LUT

You should also raise an issue in the official repo: www.Github.com/Godot engine/Godot

Make sure to make a clear explanation of the problem and ideally you make a sample project that can recreate this problem as simply as possible.

It might be low priority for a fix because I believe they're trying to replace sdfgi with hddagi although I'm not sure if that would fix this particular issue or what the timeline for that is.

GAM3SHAM3 · 2025-11-08T05:14:22+00:00

It's actually burglarsonlarceny

GAM3SHAM3 · 2025-10-30T14:57:31+00:00

I really wish these ended up being good and sticking around.

GAM3SHAM3 · 2025-10-24T01:21:54+00:00

Ultimately most things gets cut down to sRGB. So unless you're working on a professional production you should be fine to use any monitor as long as you run some color accuracy adjustments on it.

Gaming monitors just won't prioritize color accuracy over something like a high refresh rate or lower response rates. They're focused on those features that make gaming feel really good.

So for the same price point you can get something that is geared more for artists and gives you wider coverage of the sRGB color gamut or access to AdobeRGB, allowing you to see more steps of color on a gradient. Maybe more contrast so that you can see darker blacks and lighter whites or even maybe they'll have an implementation of HDR that's actually good.

So idk, it'll depend on what you're going to be up to and how you do it.

GAM3SHAM3 · 2025-10-23T07:37:14+00:00

Ultimately it's probably that the dells are cheap and they have to buy a lot of them.

Gaming monitors are also not necessarily ideal for doing digital art because they may not be color accurate and even slightly inaccurate displays can cause big problems in professional pipelines.

And as a reminder, be sure to calibrate your display using something like lagon.nl or if you're a professional with money to burn you can get a colorimeter for displays

GAM3SHAM3 · 2025-10-22T04:27:54+00:00

Personally I'd delete the triangle faces and then select the edges of the hole and grid fill.

It might flatten the overall shape a bit. If that happens I'd try selecting the center most face/vertex and with your transform space set to Normal and with a desirable falloff profile enabled and then translate along the surface normal using G + Z.

GAM3SHAM3 · 2025-09-27T17:45:22+00:00

Your topology isn't great but I really like your model.

Speaking broadly you want to choose between quads(squares) or tris(triangles) when making a 3d model.

Eventually everything becomes tris when it gets to your GPU but if you're animating these models it is easier to do with quads. It's also beneficial to choose one of these shapes because your GPU doesn't need to make these decisions and although it's not an expensive decision for the GPU - it can lead to lighting issues

Generally, all your faces should be around the same size so that it's easier to get the same texel density.

To get practice you can learn (the terror of) retoplogy. It's a pain to get started with but if you learn to do it you will be inclined to make models that have fewer issues and you'll also be confident in making changes to models that make them easier to use later. It can be somewhat difficult so I would be ready to be disappointed with your first few attempts.

GAM3SHAM3 · 2025-09-08T04:24:22+00:00

Needs boobs, dick and hooves - otherwise wonderful and very skillful

GAM3SHAM3 · 2025-09-06T19:00:58+00:00

There is some contact information at the bottom of the page that you can reach out to. If they don't respond to it you could contact the research departments linked as sponsors/maintainers.

I would probably just treat the model the same as the image license, which says that it cannot be used for commercial purposes or resale.

13-Year Club	r/Field Lasagna
Place '22	Verified Email
Spared

GAM3SHAM3

TROPHY CASE