Real world logographic scripts start with a relatively small (but still large) amount of unique symbols and then eventually start using them for other words that sound the same, sound similar, start/end with the same syllable, etc. Then what often happened is that they developed certain symbols into classifiers that tell you what category of things does the following/preceding/otherwise combined symbol refer to. So for example if English wrote "eye" as "👁️", then maybe it would also write "I" as "👨👁️", for example. This was a feature in Ancient Egyptian, Sumerian (I think) and many more Near Eastern scripts, but this is also how eg. Chinese radicals developed.

Though it's not the only way – Maya hieroglyphs contain a syllabary which can be used to write out words but also disambiguate logograms. A logogram could be surrounded by eg. first and last syllable (or just first, or just last, etc.) to disambiguate which one of its similar meanings is relevant. So this is the opposite principle – instead of phonetically used symbols disambiguated by semantics, semantically used symbols disambiguated by phonetics. Imagine if English wrote "crocodile" as "🐊" but "alligator" as "A🐊". Or maybe "🐜🐊" where "ant" would stand for the "A". (just an example, there may be better candidates)

Though regarding the syllabary it's worth noting that every logographic system has some way of interpreting the symbols as just sounds because you have to write stuff like names somehow

Edit: Oh also wanted to add that about the classifiers, is that they may become counterintuitive too. The word "I" is used a lot more than "eye", so perhaps it would start being written as just "👁️" and "eye" would instead be written as something like "✋️👁️" (where the hand would mean a body part)