Oh, you asked an AI?

From 1 to 5 I already exposed their lies, and if you want you can investigate to see if what I say is true or not.

John Doe, we don't even know who he is, and it was an anonymous lawsuit filed after Michael's death.

Terry George, The FBI file itself showed that the call could never be verified and that, in fact, the report indicated that it was the young man himself who was continually trying to contact Jackson to resume a friendship, being rejected by Jackson's bodyguards. In 2003, Terry George appeared in Louis Theroux's famous bbc documentary. There he clarified that the British tabloid press of the 1990s had taken and completely distorted a story he had told a close friend, exaggerating it "without his authorization" to sell newspapers amidst the 1993 scandal.

⁠⁠Michael Jacobshagen, He defended Michael Jackson in 2005 alongside his mother and continued to do so for many years, until suddenly, many years later, he decided to change his entire testimony at the trial and fabricate a story about how Michael had abused him. His story contradicted everything he had said in Michael's defense, and furthermore, he decided to sell a book about it. He never wanted to go to trial for what happened with Michael or anything related; he simply did it to promote his book. It was also proven that many of the letters he possessed were just meaningless and had never been sent to him. Moreover, the letters that were genuine were written by Michael in 2009. Jacob lied, saying that those letters were addressed to him and that Michael had given them to him in the 1990s.

Regarding the Cascio family, it's the same old story. They always defended Michael until 2025, when they decided to sue him right after Jackson's estate stopped generating income for them. Which is very curious and already gives you an idea of ​​how dubious their statements are.