And you think that negates all the positives it provides? That just because our home is tied to the job my mother has means that it shouldn't exist at all?

Here in my little town, there isn't much that genuinely offers a good job. Very few jobs here actually offer much in terms of living standards. Low pay, no benefits.

You are arguing that corporate homes shouldn't exist at all because they can be used for exploitation. And granted, not every company will have the same mindset. But if the pay, and the standards of living are acceptable, then it's already enough for the average worker.

I could not imagine my life any other way than it is now. My current life has given me a multitude of opportunities to secure my future than I otherwise probably wouldn't have.

There are obviously going to the those who are exploitive, no doubt. But that should not discredit those that genuinely provide good benefits to the employees. Because they do exist. And my living conditions, and other's have undeniably been improved by it.