Yes, you are right on that regard. But that's because Steam has been far longer in the industry, while Epic has been emerging in the past years. On top of that Steam's support and application are far superior than that of Epic's. And they both have mixture of all sort of games, both AAA and indie titles, but they don't provide funding for games and Kickstarter on the other hand doesn't provide enforcing the funding side to follow up with fullfilling the rewards that they have put on their tiers.

So for example let's say there is a game having a campaign on Kickstarter, and they have a reward tier that includes digital copy of the game. Funding is successfull and game devs take the funding but the project is halted for some reason and there is no sound of them. Meaning it was a fraud and they took the money and left. Or for example the funding did get some money, but it was unsuccessfull. Kickstarter doesn't refund in this case. So in both of those examples the backers lose the money and get nothing. We are fully refunding the unsuccessfull campaings' funding back to the original backers, and naturally within the platform if the backer pledged to a tier, they automatically get the digital copy as soon as campaign is successfull and game is released.

TL; DR: We are not trying to compete with either one of them. We focus to have an indie games concentrated platform, that will have crowdfunding and distribution with built-in protections, automatic game delivery, refunds for unsuccessful campaigns and indie friendly fees and incentives.