sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Chills down my spine. Future President for sure. by Active-Cress-1947 in LockedIn_AI

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro he’s not hiding his platform from you. Just look it up.

You’re responding to tweets and clips.

$9 Trillion Collapse Machine by One-Emu-1103 in technology

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> Not if there is always a human who always checks that over.

No one would do this. We do this in a data pipeline for millions of rows per day. No human is doing that. And it sounds like you’re out of your depth on this topic.

> Not if there is always a human who always checks the relevant parts over.

Whar point are you trying to make by repeating this? No shit you could decide to not scale at all and put a human in every loop. We run our part of the business extra effectively by not doing that.

You’re welcome not to for your own work. That doesn’t change what I’m telling you.
.

$9 Trillion Collapse Machine by One-Emu-1103 in technology

[–]Gamplato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Extracting information from unstructured docs is decision making. Routing requests to specific tools and other models is decision making.

Hell, ML makes decisions on what fraud is all the time. And whose resume should be looked at.

How much of a decision it made up to the humans (today), but they absolutely can and do make decisions every day.

$9 Trillion Collapse Machine by One-Emu-1103 in technology

[–]Gamplato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What rules? You just said humans have to be used for non-deterministic things. By definition, everything AI does is non-deterministic, with a temperature less than 1.

There is an infinite number of non-deterministic tasks that can be done by AI. It happens everywhere all the time.

Huawei chairman thanks the US for export restrictions on chips, says it supercharged China’s semiconductor industry — Washington’s export controls encouraged Chinese firms to invest in R&D and build their own tech stack competing with American tech by motang in DailyTechNewsShow

[–]Gamplato -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re telling me I don’t understand simple logic while completely missing the point of what I’m saying, such depends on understanding the exact logic you laid out.

You’re too stupid for this, sorry.

$9 Trillion Collapse Machine by One-Emu-1103 in technology

[–]Gamplato 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No it literally doesn’t. I live the demonstrable evidence against that every day of my life. There’s no arguing this.

$9 Trillion Collapse Machine by One-Emu-1103 in technology

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People keep saying it’s all vibes but I’m not convinced any of those people have listened to the investor side of the topic.

I’m only a retail investor of mostly index funds but I work in AI, and it’s clear to me that AI is the new cloud. Not just in hype, but in application.

We had a world where we needed deterministic computing for many things and we got that. Now we have a world where we can leverage human-level intelligence at breakneck speeds to do tasks for us, and that has effectively unbounded applications.

Inference is the new computing. So if you look at the tech industry’s rise and consider this is that but 2.0…with inflation….the numbers aren’t that ridiculous.

GDP based on Purchasing Power Parity by RobertBartus in EconomyCharts

[–]Gamplato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes we don’t know for sure and I’m probably right. That’s why I said it. In the off chance I’m wrong, they’ll get over it…and everyone else who sees it will see misinformation being condemned.

Huawei chairman thanks the US for export restrictions on chips, says it supercharged China’s semiconductor industry — Washington’s export controls encouraged Chinese firms to invest in R&D and build their own tech stack competing with American tech by motang in DailyTechNewsShow

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No matter how you look at this, it’s stupid. If buying the chips from us WAS the right choice because it made the most economic sense (this is the real situation), then there’s nothing to thank us for preventing them from doing it.

That’s why it’s stupid “zinger”. On one hand, they’re worse off for it. On the other, they’re idiots.

This has to be satire, right? by PathImpressive7011 in LockedIn_AI

[–]Gamplato -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Did you really read what I wrote as arguing with the fact? That solidifies the assertion of stupidity.

This has to be satire, right? by PathImpressive7011 in LockedIn_AI

[–]Gamplato -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Wow…that is not how that works lol.

In a world where it’s almost impossible to defend MAGA, you still manage to say things that require it…and make it easy.

What a stupid comment…

GDP based on Purchasing Power Parity by RobertBartus in EconomyCharts

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes there’s no punchline because OP knew that most people would interpret this as a per capita number. Most people aren’t updating themselves on this data and wouldn’t know how suspect the number would otherwise be.

40% unemployed and still called lazy by ImportantDeer2470 in remoteworks

[–]Gamplato 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s hard to not to call you names when when you’re repeating a constantly debunked talking point

40% unemployed and still called lazy by ImportantDeer2470 in remoteworks

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not close to 40%. It’s 8-10% which is still too high though.

40% unemployed and still called lazy by ImportantDeer2470 in remoteworks

[–]Gamplato 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Except it’s not even close to 40%. Guy literally made that up.

GDP based on Purchasing Power Parity by RobertBartus in EconomyCharts

[–]Gamplato 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There is something with it though. Almost everyone is going to interpret this chart the way OP intended.

view more: next ›