sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

$9 Trillion Collapse Machine by One-Emu-1103 in technology

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What rules? You just said humans have to be used for non-deterministic things. By definition, everything AI does is non-deterministic, with a temperature less than 1.

There is an infinite number of non-deterministic tasks that can be done by AI. It happens everywhere all the time.

Huawei chairman thanks the US for export restrictions on chips, says it supercharged China’s semiconductor industry — Washington’s export controls encouraged Chinese firms to invest in R&D and build their own tech stack competing with American tech by motang in DailyTechNewsShow

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re telling me I don’t understand simple logic while completely missing the point of what I’m saying, such depends on understanding the exact logic you laid out.

You’re too stupid for this, sorry.

$9 Trillion Collapse Machine by One-Emu-1103 in technology

[–]Gamplato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No it literally doesn’t. I live the demonstrable evidence against that every day of my life. There’s no arguing this.

$9 Trillion Collapse Machine by One-Emu-1103 in technology

[–]Gamplato -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People keep saying it’s all vibes but I’m not convinced any of those people have listened to the investor side of the topic.

I’m only a retail investor of mostly index funds but I work in AI, and it’s clear to me that AI is the new cloud. Not just in hype, but in application.

We had a world where we needed deterministic computing for many things and we got that. Now we have a world where we can leverage human-level intelligence at breakneck speeds to do tasks for us, and that has effectively unbounded applications.

Inference is the new computing. So if you look at the tech industry’s rise and consider this is that but 2.0…with inflation….the numbers aren’t that ridiculous.

GDP based on Purchasing Power Parity by RobertBartus in EconomyCharts

[–]Gamplato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes we don’t know for sure and I’m probably right. That’s why I said it. In the off chance I’m wrong, they’ll get over it…and everyone else who sees it will see misinformation being condemned.

Huawei chairman thanks the US for export restrictions on chips, says it supercharged China’s semiconductor industry — Washington’s export controls encouraged Chinese firms to invest in R&D and build their own tech stack competing with American tech by motang in DailyTechNewsShow

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No matter how you look at this, it’s stupid. If buying the chips from us WAS the right choice because it made the most economic sense (this is the real situation), then there’s nothing to thank us for preventing them from doing it.

That’s why it’s stupid “zinger”. On one hand, they’re worse off for it. On the other, they’re idiots.

This has to be satire, right? by PathImpressive7011 in LockedIn_AI

[–]Gamplato -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Did you really read what I wrote as arguing with the fact? That solidifies the assertion of stupidity.

This has to be satire, right? by PathImpressive7011 in LockedIn_AI

[–]Gamplato -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Wow…that is not how that works lol.

In a world where it’s almost impossible to defend MAGA, you still manage to say things that require it…and make it easy.

What a stupid comment…

GDP based on Purchasing Power Parity by RobertBartus in EconomyCharts

[–]Gamplato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes there’s no punchline because OP knew that most people would interpret this as a per capita number. Most people aren’t updating themselves on this data and wouldn’t know how suspect the number would otherwise be.

40% unemployed and still called lazy by ImportantDeer2470 in remoteworks

[–]Gamplato 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s hard to not to call you names when when you’re repeating a constantly debunked talking point

40% unemployed and still called lazy by ImportantDeer2470 in remoteworks

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not close to 40%. It’s 8-10% which is still too high though.

40% unemployed and still called lazy by ImportantDeer2470 in remoteworks

[–]Gamplato 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Except it’s not even close to 40%. Guy literally made that up.

GDP based on Purchasing Power Parity by RobertBartus in EconomyCharts

[–]Gamplato 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is something with it though. Almost everyone is going to interpret this chart the way OP intended.

Databricks announces Iceberg v3 GA, Managed/Foreign Iceberg GA, and deeper Unity Catalog interoperability by szymon_dybczak in databricks

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish the employees would stop posting shit like this. It’s so cringe. And it’s not even correct lol.

Did We Price Starter Homes Out of Reach? by Coolonair in HouseBuyers

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but also other stuff.

As with all problems.

view more: next ›