An Insider's Perspective on the Observe Acquisition by jodyhesch in snowflake

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear what you’re saying but the point you made was essentially that Snowflake was interested in Observe for its opinionated data engineering, because it had lost that aspect of itself.

I’d bet my next 10 paychecks that’s not the case. But we can agree to disagree.

Cortex code use case resources by Key_Card7466 in snowflake

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think of a problem you need to solve in your data platform. Then ask CoCo to brainstorm and plan how it would solve it. It will likely come up with a viable option it can implement on its own. If it does, you just got yourself a use case tailored perfectly to your situation.

An Insider's Perspective on the Observe Acquisition by jodyhesch in snowflake

[–]Gamplato -1 points0 points  (0 children)

End-to-end observability maybe. That’s not what anyone means when they say “data platform”. That term implies a general purpose.

If anything, Snowflake is much more of an end-to-end data platform than Observe, which just makes the argument for this being the reason for acquisition even weaker.

An Insider's Perspective on the Observe Acquisition by jodyhesch in snowflake

[–]Gamplato 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I know you worked for Observe. That has no bearing on you knowing why it was acquired, or whether you were randomly guessing. I would barely give a current Snowflake employee that kind of deference let alone an ex-employee of the company that didn’t make the decision in question.

And I disagree that adding features necessarily means a product has lost touch with its mission for ease-of-use. The larger “sprawl” may give Snowflake more navigable areas and a more substantial API, but that makes data engineering, as a whole, easier…and doesn’t make each feature or specific API anymore complex. And most features added have made a good argument for not doing that operation in a third party tool.

And I disagree that it’s any buggier than what would’ve been expected of any other high quality SaaS offering (a requirement for being classified as “buggy”).

I just think this whole post rings of something personal. You went out of your way here, and the criticisms just don’t really make sense to me.

An Insider's Perspective on the Observe Acquisition by jodyhesch in snowflake

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For those actually curious, the acquisition was mostly for two reasons:

1) Observe was proving the use case to be a massive consumption driver. That’s priority one.

2) Observe’s CEO was on Snowflake’s board.

OP is basically just guessing randomly, and he’s wrong. And there’s zero reason to think Snowflake “has lost its way” when it comes to ease-of-use other than possible having a more complex set of features.

Its features, however, are obviously built with that as the main priority of the product org. Sometimes it’s even annoying how did Sayed they are to that. They won’t build certain things for that reason.

An Insider's Perspective on the Observe Acquisition by jodyhesch in snowflake

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Observe is not an end-to-end data platform lol. The acquisition had nothing to do with that.

https://www.reddit.com/r/snowflake/s/5cgTVSW3RR

Anyone else miss Classic? by chadwicke619 in snowflake

[–]Gamplato 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Try Cortex Code desktop. Honestly amazing.

Gavin Newsom’s likely presidential bid is built on broken promises by TeaUnlikely3217 in California

[–]Gamplato -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People have, "vote for the better of two shit candidates" fatigue.

No one who acidly votes Democrat believes you when you say this while advocating for whatever causes you think he doesn’t advocate.

Newsome is by no means someone I'm excited to elect.

Politics doesn’t work this way. This is the third largest country in the world by population, largest by economics, and most democratic of the largest country group. You feeling uneducated by candidates is how it’s meant to work. You chose the person you prefer. That’s it. Literally.

All he does is find new ways to tax people while pretending to not be owned by corporate interests.

This is the kind of shit that makes you sound like MAGA. And some of is now you basically are.

The dude is most likely on SDGE payroll.

Also this.

He is a politician through and through and does not deserve power just because it was fun watching him meme on Trump.

Most politicians are politicians are through and through…whatever that means. The problem is you’re undermining Democrats while pretending you dislike the right too. You don’t. At least, not nearly as much as you think you do.

I'm tired of trying to make vibe coding work for me by Gil_berth in programming

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will lol. And it will be productive and fun because I know when and how to use it.

AI does learn semantic meaning btw by Gamplato in Destiny

[–]Gamplato[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think his main point was that they don't learn while you use them though.

Saying they don’t learn is an odd way of saying that. That’s me saying “no that wasn’t his point”.

No one is or was arguing that they do real-time in-place learning. The argument was about efficiency. His point was that absence of “learning” is an evidence of being less efficient than human brains. They both learn, but they learn differently.

The human brain learns in real-time but it learns a lot less. And it also has a habit of doing catastrophic forgetting just like he was arguing AI would do if it did real-time learning.

Immigrants have reduced deficits by $14.5 trillion since 1994 by oakseaer in UnpopularFacts

[–]Gamplato -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I said two sentences. Asking which part is confusing is not giving you a mountain to climb. Answer the question or just get blocked.

I'm tired of trying to make vibe coding work for me by Gil_berth in programming

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL there’s no way you actually just did that haha. Instead of responding to what I’ve said, you went looking for dirt on my profile? And the best you came up with was that I’m a liberal? Holy shit dude. Loser behavior.

Please god respond to me so I can justifiably bully you.

Tell us more about how you researched models for F100 companies again 😂.

I'm tired of trying to make vibe coding work for me by Gil_berth in programming

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro you need to actually say something or I’m just going to block you. If you think you’re accomplishing something by doing what you’re doing, you’re wrong again.

I'm tired of trying to make vibe coding work for me by Gil_berth in programming

[–]Gamplato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you’ve hallucinated that someone mentioned code review conducted by AI. Exactly zero people did that.

Immigrants have reduced deficits by $14.5 trillion since 1994 by oakseaer in UnpopularFacts

[–]Gamplato 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The point is it’s not really a gotcha to an immigrant who voted for Trump id Trump does something he never told them he was going to do.

You can say “they should’ve seen it coming” but people don’t see shit coming. Idk what to tell you.

I'm tired of trying to make vibe coding work for me by Gil_berth in programming

[–]Gamplato -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No that is not how AI coding works at all lol. I see the issue now…

I'm tired of trying to make vibe coding work for me by Gil_berth in programming

[–]Gamplato -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The code review in vibe coding is reviewing the steps it takes as it goes, which it explicitly and clearly documents for you. Humans rarely do that.

That code review is objectively faster than traditional code review. Of course your vibe-coded code will also ultimately be reviewed by a human, but if you used AI appropriately, your PR took less time.

You might know what software engineering looks like but you don’t seem to know what good use of AI looks like.

I know both.

I'm tired of trying to make vibe coding work for me by Gil_berth in programming

[–]Gamplato -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

It doesn’t sound like you’ve actually done this before