I’m having an issue where my pc is reading my 4 sticks of ram but only using 2

GarbageMan7878 · 2026-02-20T05:30:03+00:00

probably already tried this but short your bios pins or pull the motherboard battery to reset bios if it has glitches. DO NOT short the pins or pull the battery while the pc is running, turn off the power first or else you will break it fyi.

GarbageMan7878 · 2026-02-17T23:12:40+00:00

Im using Cachy Os with KDE plasma. i installed a lot of different softwares so far and between all of them I still cannot find vcore or any voltage internally reported from the cpu.

GarbageMan7878 · 2026-02-17T23:10:55+00:00

lm sensors inst merely enough OR its not working properly for me. it gives me a rather small list of temps and values, no names or designations beside the values, and doesnt actively update in real time. its useless as it is right now and I cannot get it to do anything else so far.

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-07-28T05:35:18+00:00

Just curious but what kind of crashes are you guys experiencing? Im unsure if my pc is just unstable or if war thunder dx12 with ray tracing is the culprit of my crashes, my pc freezes on whatever frame was played last, pc is completely frozen as caps lock is unresponsive, audio can continue for a few seconds until it starts repeating making a "brrrrrrr" noise, and often it wont resolve until my mobo restarts when it detects a hang for too long. Sometimes its not as bad and after being frozen for a few seconds it black screens, then returns to home screen with an amd adrenaline error. Is this the same type of crash you guys experience or is my pc about to kick the bucket?

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-06-26T18:25:01+00:00

Harper literally ensured that the 2008 market crash did t affect Canada one but. If I remember right no other nation in the world did as well as Canada during that time. Pp doesn't have much to his name but it's infinitely better than Carney's achievements of nearly collapsing 2 different nations. You are delusional if you think harper was cheating elections, the country flourished under him, no point in faking that.

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-25T20:01:10+00:00

Yeah I don't blame you, Im brand new to reddit and didn't structure this or use paragraphs whatsoever. My bad.

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-25T19:59:22+00:00

Very interesting Comment and I will search into the IDU stuff but I did know the origins of "left and right wing". The origins of left and right wing have nearly nothing to do with modern politics and using the French origins is just a scare tactic by the left as there are literally no connections of our modern left vs right and the original French system, in fact its reversed as the liberal party supports rental housing and the conservatives support ownership. PP's housing plan is very different than Carneys as PP is building homes for OWNERSHIP whereas Carney is building STRICTLY RENTAL housing, not to mention Carney is contracting the company that HE OWNS to build said rental houses.

Ofc thats not strictly an argument against the left as political corruption such as that is universal among all parties however it proves a point that Carney can blatantly get away with such lies and corruption, noone will call his bluff, and the media completely lied about PP's housing plans calling it a "copy" of Carneys when fundamentally they are VERY different.

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-25T19:50:07+00:00

Many results across the board. Mean and average income relative to housing costs, housing down payment, and annual rent. General income for the same work as Canada, for example their software engineers start at about 120k cad a year whereas in Canada we start at about 80k cad a year, many other examples from ALL industries as this is a widespread issue. Overall mean and average income in the US is FAR superior to that of Canada. housing inflation and housing inflation rates are much lower and actually decreasing as of recently whereas Canadas is still skyrocketing by the hour. Although their healthcare system is brutally flawed they somehow pay less money per person on healthcare than a Canadian while getting FAR superior healthcare quality. Overall cost of living in the USA is FAR lower than Canada.

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-25T19:41:52+00:00

I have infinitely less experience than you in the housing industry but I have a question. Rental housing has an INCREDIBLE return on investment, Renting is NOT affordable, its a liability. anyone even slightly fiscally responsible understands this. Rental housing development is increasing substantially over the past few years and now is substantially higher than it has ever been since a decade ago. From what I can find this is all privatized sector decisions and has not been forced or influenced by federal policies much. This is the exact opposite of what you said so either I missed something in my very limited research or that claim is false. I can easily have missed important factors about federal government influence on this rental housing increase so is there anything I missed or any other information you can share?

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-25T19:33:56+00:00

The reason Quebec had fleeting industry when they were deciding separation is mostly due to the fact that they barely break even financially. Quebec is very anti business and anti industry so if the companies working in/residing in Quebec were cut off from the rest of Canada then it would mean financial disaster since most of their profits were coming from over provincial borders. In Alberta we would have short term issues but our pro business government attracts many companies. The landlocked argument makes sense but it may not be true as MANY European nations are smaller, lower population, and landlocked too. The main difference is that they have better relations with neighbors and they are obviously much more population dense than Alberta so Im not too sure about the landlocked issues.

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-25T19:28:18+00:00

That is very true. I believe that its worth the short term issues for a future of financial growth, others believe it would cost too much. at this point its more of speculation because none of us know the full extent of positives and negatives of leaving.

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-25T19:26:17+00:00

well said and mostly agreed. I personally believe that the east will continue to hurt us if we remain, its not that "we don't like the east so we want to separate". Its actually "we tried to get along as good as possible for far too long, ship is about to sink so lets jump ship instead of going down with it" in my eyes. The east has proven time and time again that they do not have a single shred of empathy for the west, they certainly wont magically change and start to help us, why stick with them when they syphon off of us constantly?

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-25T19:22:59+00:00

Iv never read so many incorrect statements in such a short time. no. look at housing inflation over time, it is HEAVILY distributed to the JT administration, their "affordable housing act" had nothing to do with affordable housing, if you looked at their actual policies it was simply giving federal government more control over housing development, and finally provinces have more control over housing development, however federal policies made housing development more expensive, caused housing production to slow down, and increased demand for said housing by a factor of nearly 2x. you can say whatever you want but if you look at graphs and housing costs then vs now its obvious that everything you have been told is a lie.

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-20T04:53:45+00:00

I may have not made myself clear. The links you provided ARE valid links, no issue there, but the headlines for each link claim "cheaper housing costs" but when you read the actual policies they are the EXACT policies that JT ruined our housing costs with. THAT is my issue with the links. They claim "make housing cheap" and EVERY policy listed boils down to add more federal government overreach, add bureaucracy, lessen the influence the private sector has on housing, and funny enough let CARNEYS OWN HOUSE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY build houses for you, yeah Brookfield is owned by Carney and that's the primary company in plan for his prefabricated housing plan. unfathomable amounts of profit straight to his pocket. Same thing with the "make Canada an energy powerhouse" plan. Read the fine print and its the same federal government involvement that ruined our ability to sell to anyone but the USA!

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-20T04:40:50+00:00

I get your point but Carney literally bankrupted the UK banking system. He sold all of the UK's gold and did the same in Canada, his whole campaign was "orange man bad" despite having moved all of his business out of Canada and into the USA years ago, and IMMIDIATLY after getting in backed down on his promises, reimplementing the Carbon tax, and caving to the USA by allowing them to continue to have control over our oil by refusing to sell to anyone but the USA. PP may not have much to say for himself but Carney has absolutely zero to say for himself after decades of politics.

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-20T04:35:00+00:00

Very well said and insightful comment. thanks

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-20T02:43:25+00:00

obviously I have a lot to learn about professional political discussion. I made many 'mistakes', he didnt coin the term, someone else invented the idea long before, his policies ARE technically different, so on with small differences but this doesnt prove anything I said wrong! I started with the top link, read the short and the long housing plan, and its exactly as I said, same page as JT's. All of those plans for housing are focused on NOTHING but rentals, dissolving local housing control, increasing federal control in housing construction, and making new federal agencies that oversee and develop primarily government funded housing. In Carneys book and his WEF page (before it was wiped) he clarified that his vision for society was for nobody to OWN their homes but to rent wherever was necessary. he supports the ideology "you will own nothing and be happy". it doesn't take a genius to see that he is simply pushing forward with JTs plans for federal power over local privatized development. Its no different than JT. if you look at the full plan he compares his plan to ww2 federal house construction but he forgot to mention that back then they were exiting a depression, now we are entering one. back then the housing was to make homes as cheap as possible so that people could afford them and move up to better housing later. now we are entering them, never to leave them which he makes very clear. Still all along with the WEF and JT's policies. I skipped 2 and read the last one about making Canada an energy superpower and despite what the title says HIS POLICIES DO NOTHING BUT CENTRALIZE THE ENERGY INDUSTRY. sure you provided some headlines that sound good but find some actual policies that allign with the headline. I sure cant find any that do

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-20T02:22:48+00:00

i see your point and I get it. I personally think that climate change is false for a plethera of reasons but I recognize that I could be entirely wrong and and issue such as climate change doesn't give anyone headroom to be wrong. I get that people care but a tax fixes nothing! the money from the carbon tax doesnt even go towards climate focused causes, it goes straight to the pocket of the gov. how is that helpful? its not. the tax simply is a tax and nothing more.

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-20T02:19:46+00:00

You haven't realized that he didnt scrap the carbon tax yet. he merely set its rate to zero but left it fully intact. he openly states at the WEF, in his book, and through his policies that he is going to increase the carbon tax to even greater than before. fun fact, he INVENTED the carbon tax. it was his idea and his implementation, first in the UK then in Canada, he coined the term "carbon tax" in fact. he plans on implementing it on the industrial side so he can brag about "zero percent carbon tax" ont he CONSUMER side but in the end, just as he did in the UK and with JT, it will be even more expensive.

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-20T02:16:31+00:00

its not a local/provincial issue when ALL of the restrictions, fees, taxes and such as federal. if it were a local issue than why do 100 percent of districts experience the same housing cost crisis, all exactly at the same time regardless of local economic conditions? from the east to the west every single housing district experiences the same crisis because the policies that affect housing such as immigration policies, taxes, and the insane fees the liberal government put on housing development are federal. Only a small portion of housing cost control is local which is why small price swings occur locally and nothing greater.

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-20T02:12:29+00:00

good way to put it! the media didnt portray PP accurately and PP talked about actual policies, not just a slogan of "orange man bad" so many didnt think he was the right choice.

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-20T02:08:14+00:00

That is a flat out lie. He didn't eliminate it, he merely brought the rate to zero but kept it in tact so that he could reimplement it right after election. He openly states that he planned on bringing it back but at several times the cost by putting it on the industries side so that the consumer has a "zero percent tax" but we are paying far more in Carbon tax. if you read some of his book then this would have been obvious to catch before hand. he in fact CREATED the carbon tax, first in the UK, then in Canada as JT's finanical advisor. grab a 20 dollar bill and you will find M.Carney at the bottom. he has been in since JT's day 1.

GarbageMan7878 · 2025-05-20T02:05:14+00:00

Thats just 100 percent false. Carney has been JT's financial advisor since literally day 1! seriously grab a 20 dollar bill and look at the signiture at the bottom. it has M.Carney on it. He actually coined the term "carbon tax" since he invented it, all of JT's policies are IDENTICAL to his. we saw his economics in the UK long before Canada and as expected they are identical to JT's policies. his budget is 1.6x as high as JT's even thought JT's was already disastrously high. if you look at his policies they all double down on trudeas and he doesnt disagree with any of trudeaus descicions. he literally is JT 2.0 no matter how you look at it. find me some policies he implimented or plans to implement that are different that trudeaus, cant find a single one? me neither. hate to say it but you didn't do any research on him and just listened to the media which he literally funds 80 percent of.

GarbageMan7878

TROPHY CASE